Mega Thread 2014 Free Agency and Trade discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Gysberts2Bate

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Posts
14,481
Likes
16,732
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
Yeah but all 3 of those guys would kill to get that amount of footy just once in there AFL career
He butchers it for sure but he is lucky that his competition is the outstanding junior talents of Blease, Strauss and Tappy
Tapscott and Blease have both played outstanding games at AFL level. Their problem isn't a low ceiling, it's a great proclivity towards turning in trash-like performances as well.
 

Darksidepoints

Premiership Player
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Posts
4,540
Likes
3,519
AFL Club
Melbourne
I dont understand this club at all.

How the hell are they anything but fringe/depth players at best. They wouldnt get a sniff at ANY other AFL list, yet they play week in and out for Melbourne.

Okay maybe Riley deserves another year, but Jesus Christ on a bike, Bail and Terlich?

Disappointing is the nicest way of putting it. This list needs to be swept clean and we retain two bit players.

/golfclap
 

Topkent

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
32,308
Likes
38,949
Location
Canada
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Winnipeg Jets
I dont understand this club at all.

How the hell are they anything but fringe/depth players at best. They wouldnt get a sniff at ANY other AFL list, yet they play week in and out for Melbourne.

Okay maybe Riley deserves another year, but Jesus Christ on a bike, Bail and Terlich?

Disappointing is the nicest way of putting it. This list needs to be swept clean and we retain two bit players.

/golfclap
Roos doesn't build teams by playing 14 teenagers , he needs a culture where draftees have reach a level of defensive out put before they can get a game

Until watts toumpas Tyson viney etc can set that benchmark then bail and terlich an co will continue to set that benchmark

These guys were not retained for there skill
They were retained because the minimum output of the majority is still horrible
 

Tulip

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
31,615
Likes
25,154
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Tottenham
Six other Melbourne clubs have had a word.

**** off you filthy, insensitive campaigners.

And I mean that. It would be an absolute farce if he returned to anywhere but Melbourne, especially if he's living here.

It shouldn't even be an option, and I'd hope those other clubs had a bit more class than that.
 

CWaffles

Premiership Player
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Posts
3,920
Likes
3,998
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Ferrari, Chicago Bulls, NY Giants
Six other Melbourne clubs have had a word.

**** off you filthy, insensitive campaigners.

And I mean that. It would be an absolute farce if he returned to anywhere but Melbourne, especially if he's living here.

It shouldn't even be an option, and I'd hope those other clubs had a bit more class than that.
Where did you read this?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Gysberts2Bate

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Posts
14,481
Likes
16,732
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
Alot of people keep blaming the bottom 6 of the team as if that is our problem when its not, its the 6 behind Jones, Tyson and Vince
This is pretty much spot on. If Watts, Trengove, Grimes, Howe, Frawley, Dawes, Garland and McDonald play to potential and do so consistently every week it a) helps out the more talented players already doing it like Jones, Tyson, Vince, Dunn, Cross and Jetta and b) means that less talented players like Pedersen and Bail and even the Tapscotts and Bleases of the world (talented but poorly developed) need only play their role to be effective. Then you can add young guys like Toumpas, Salem, Viney, Gawn, Kent, Michie, Fitzpatrick, JKH and allow them to develop properly while demonstrating some readymade ability to influence AFL contests. Like you said it's that core group at the moment who should be the best players at the club who are letting everyone else down through combination of injury, skill deficiency and lack of effort.
 

Topkent

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
32,308
Likes
38,949
Location
Canada
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Winnipeg Jets
This is pretty much spot on. If Watts, Trengove, Grimes, Howe, Frawley, Dawes, Garland and McDonald play to potential and do so consistently every week it a) helps out the more talented players already doing it like Jones, Tyson, Vince, Dunn, Cross and Jetta and b) means that less talented players like Pedersen and Bail and even the Tapscotts and Bleases of the world (talented but poorly developed) need only play their role to be effective. Then you can add young guys like Toumpas, Salem, Viney, Gawn, Kent, Michie, Fitzpatrick, JKH and allow them to develop properly while demonstrating some readymade ability to influence AFL contests. Like you said it's that core group at the moment who should be the best players at the club who are letting everyone else down through combination of injury, skill deficiency and lack of effort.
I couldnt have said that any better, Too many of our senior players have failed to reach a high level of AFL football consistently
Nathan Jones is the only player on our list who has played to his ability game after game season after season ( new recruits exempt )
 
Joined
May 4, 2010
Posts
19,737
Likes
7,289
Location
Under the Bridge Downtown
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Houston Texans
Yeah but all 3 of those guys would kill to get that amount of footy just once in there AFL career
He butchers it for sure but he is lucky that his competition is the outstanding junior talents of Blease, Strauss and Tappy
I wasn't talking about any of those three - just pointing out that Terlich really is quite average.
 

Topkent

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
32,308
Likes
38,949
Location
Canada
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Winnipeg Jets
I wasn't talking about any of those three - just pointing out that Terlich really is quite average.
Oh yeah Terlich is trash, I just dont understand some of the people here who think that delisting 12 players will automatically = 12 better players
 

Cannon82

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Posts
14,090
Likes
18,835
AFL Club
Melbourne
Oh yeah Terlich is trash, I just dont understand some of the people here who think that delisting 12 players will automatically = 12 better players
No one does, but drafting someone with pick 70 seems more likely to be successful than hoping a lemon turns into a star (or even a decent footballer). Oddly enough, when you're at the bottom of the table with a shit list, sacking people and bringing in new players might help. If it's a top 4 side - yeah, more likely than not those late picks aren't going to improve on what you have.

No one has seriously suggested shooting 12 of these lame ducks either, but mediocre players getting contract extensions is nothing to get excited about.
 

Theseventhhamster

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Posts
12,674
Likes
8,274
Location
Hell
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Milwaukee Bucks
Bail's good to keep until his spot and a backup or two have gone past him. Terlich already has met that criteria so it sucks he's still around. Riley is worth another look at after a preseason as he looked good when he wasn't tired.
 

CWaffles

Premiership Player
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Posts
3,920
Likes
3,998
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Ferrari, Chicago Bulls, NY Giants
Rumour of an offer from GC for Frawley worth $800,000 a year over 6 years.

This is from a Facebook page so take it with a grain of salt, but would give us pick 3 if it were to happen and would be a great move by chip.
 

Topkent

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
32,308
Likes
38,949
Location
Canada
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Winnipeg Jets
No one does, but drafting someone with pick 70 seems more likely to be successful than hoping a lemon turns into a star (or even a decent footballer). Oddly enough, when you're at the bottom of the table with a shit list, sacking people and bringing in new players might help. If it's a top 4 side - yeah, more likely than not those late picks aren't going to improve on what you have.

No one has seriously suggested shooting 12 of these lame ducks either, but mediocre players getting contract extensions is nothing to get excited about.
Matt Jones Pick 53
Dean Terlich Pick 68
James Sellar Pick 54
Rohan Bail Pick 64
Isaac Weetra Pick 62
Josh Tynan Pick 52

Couch, Williams, Magner, Stark, Clisby, Sheahan, Nicholson, Evans, Johnston, Lawrence, Campbell, Mcnamara
There is our list of Rookie stars in the last 3 years

There aint alot of talent around after the first few picks

2,3,20,38,56,74,92,110,128
Thats 9 Picks


Your welcome to tell me who out of that list of amazing late talent will get the job done, because thats who we will get with pick 110

The only way that we will use more than about 5-6 picks at the Draft is if we Trade out talent for it

No one will offer us ANYTHING for Bail,Terlich, Riley, Mckenzie etc



If we somehow end up with 7 picks in the top 40 then by all means delist away
 

Topkent

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
32,308
Likes
38,949
Location
Canada
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Winnipeg Jets
Rumour of an offer from GC for Frawley worth $800,000 a year over 6 years.

This is from a Facebook page so take it with a grain of salt, but would give us pick 3 if it were to happen and would be a great move by chip.
Stupid amount of money for him if true, but if there was one place you could go for a guaranteed premiership it would be there
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Posts
2,941
Likes
2,369
Location
Ferntree Gully
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Leeds United
Rumour of an offer from GC for Frawley worth $800,000 a year over 6 years.

This is from a Facebook page so take it with a grain of salt, but would give us pick 3 if it were to happen and would be a great move by chip.
GC is exactly the place I would go if I were Chip. And if he gets anywhere near that salary, it would be idiotic of him not to leave. GC will win a flag in the next 3 years and are all but assured of an annual finals place from next season on.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Posts
2,941
Likes
2,369
Location
Ferntree Gully
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Leeds United
Matt Jones Pick 53
Dean Terlich Pick 68
James Sellar Pick 54
Rohan Bail Pick 64
Isaac Weetra Pick 62
Josh Tynan Pick 52

Couch, Williams, Magner, Stark, Clisby, Sheahan, Nicholson, Evans, Johnston, Lawrence, Campbell, Mcnamara
There is our list of Rookie stars in the last 3 years

There aint alot of talent around after the first few picks

2,3,20,38,56,74,92,110,128
Thats 9 Picks


Your welcome to tell me who out of that list of amazing late talent will get the job done, because thats who we will get with pick 110

The only way that we will use more than about 5-6 picks at the Draft is if we Trade out talent for it

No one will offer us ANYTHING for Bail,Terlich, Riley, Mckenzie etc



If we somehow end up with 7 picks in the top 40 then by all means delist away
You're giving us examples of players who the MFC have chosen with late picks. What about Dan Hannebry or Robbie Gray(55)? Westhoff(71) Sam Fisher(55). Dane Swan went in the 70's. Andrew Swallow went 43. Even Brent Harvey back in the day went late 40's. James Hird went 79 didn't he? Taylor Walker went in the 70's! Our own Stephen Tingay, Russell Robertson and Cam Bruce all were after pick 50. Daniel Cross was in the 50's and I could mention dozens and dozens of rookie listed players who went on to become stars.

Yes, lots of duds with picks after 2nd round, however, we have lots of duds that have been number 1 pick as well. I'd prefer the club got rid of the likes of Bail and Terlich who clearly aren't up to this level, and try our luck at the draft or trade table. Cross, Vince and Tyson have proven you can get players from other clubs in who can have impact right away! I don't mind Bail, but surely after the coach comes out and says we need more talent, you don't go signing on two players who have none. I understand we can't turn over 12+ players in one off season. We need fodder to scrap at the end of next season as well. However, my personal opinion is, I'd rather us look to the draft or trade table in place of Terlich, Spencer and Bail etc.
 

hulkhogan1

Team Captain
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Posts
530
Likes
380
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Man U, PSG, Victory, Real Madrid,
No one does, but drafting someone with pick 70 seems more likely to be successful than hoping a lemon turns into a star (or even a decent footballer). Oddly enough, when you're at the bottom of the table with a shit list, sacking people and bringing in new players might help. If it's a top 4 side - yeah, more likely than not those late picks aren't going to improve on what you have.

No one has seriously suggested shooting 12 of these lame ducks either, but mediocre players getting contract extensions is nothing to get excited about.
Jetta turned from being a lemon, into one of our best, but I do agree though. Terlich is at the age where you'd think he can't really improve much, especially with the kicking skills that he possesses.
 

Topkent

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
32,308
Likes
38,949
Location
Canada
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Winnipeg Jets
You're giving us examples of players who the MFC have chosen with late picks. What about Dan Hannebry or Robbie Gray(55)? Westhoff(71) Sam Fisher(55). Dane Swan went in the 70's. Andrew Swallow went 43. Even Brent Harvey back in the day went late 40's. James Hird went 79 didn't he? Taylor Walker went in the 70's! Our own Stephen Tingay, Russell Robertson and Cam Bruce all were after pick 50. Daniel Cross was in the 50's and I could mention dozens and dozens of rookie listed players who went on to become stars.

Yes, lots of duds with picks after 2nd round, however, we have lots of duds that have been number 1 pick as well. I'd prefer the club got rid of the likes of Bail and Terlich who clearly aren't up to this level, and try our luck at the draft or trade table. Cross, Vince and Tyson have proven you can get players from other clubs in who can have impact right away! I don't mind Bail, but surely after the coach comes out and says we need more talent, you don't go signing on two players who have none. I understand we can't turn over 12+ players in one off season. We need fodder to scrap at the end of next season as well. However, my personal opinion is, I'd rather us look to the draft or trade table in place of Terlich, Spencer and Bail etc.
Yep all those mentioned went between 50 and 80?

So pick 2,3,20,38,56,74,92 110,128

Lets say we use those 7 picks at the draft then and bring in the magic at 74 and 92

Strauss, Blease, Tapscott, Frawley, Clark, Byrnes and Jetta Upgraded ... Thats 7 players already!
If you Delist Terlich and Riley that means we are using 110 and 128 ... Id rather keep guys who have already played AFL

Cross was a delisted FA, And Vince and Tyson cost us draft picks

Im sick of explaining this to people, your solutions aren't practical this season unless we fill the list with delisted players from other clubs which is just replacing one spud with another or not filling the primary list

NEXT season when we can play in FA you will see the back of as many spuds as we can possibly get rid of, but our hands are tied this season

There is a very real chance that Bail, Terlich and Riley will be at Casey all season, but he obviously prefers that trio to Strauss, Tappy and Blease
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom