So pick 20 on its own would have been a fair deal, right? Because they could have drafted Fyfe with that pick.
Maybe in 2010, you should have traded out one of your better players for pick 40. Because you could still have drafted Luke Parker. That would have made it a good deal, right?
Maybe in 2001, you should have traded out one of your better players for pick 58. Because you could still have drafted Dane Swan. That would have been a good deal, right?
Or maybe in 2000, you should have traded out one of your better players for the 28th pick in the rookie draft. Because you could still have drafted Dean Cox. So that would have been a good deal, right?
Bearing all that in mind, how about trading Jack Gunston for pick 20 this year? You never know. You might be able to draft the next Nat Fyfe. And that would make it a fair deal, right?
Sometimes there are good players available later in the draft. That's a fact. It doesn't turn a shitty deal into a good one.