still unsure why so many here feel as though Clark will be a welcomed inclusion and we can effectively brush off either Simpson or McIntosh.
He's been so injury-prone, 97 games in 8 seasons and this is the bloke we are entrusting to take over ruck/key forward duties?
At least Menzel and Vardy have youth on their side given they're both 4 years younger. I was extremely critical we went after McIntosh at the time, just too much of a gamble on these big blokes.
Do others agree?
In light of what's just happened with Christensen, it's a gamble we simply can't afford now.
As a
forward Mitch is definitely a welcome inclusion, on Walkins last couple of games we now have more than 1 option there in case of injury. Still not sure if he (Clark) is actually expected to take a prominent ruck role as opposed to 'as needed hitouts etc'.
We cannot effectively brush off either Simpson or McIntosh! However if injury was to preclude either playing we are slightly more viable, would like to know whether Clark is willing/capable of playing as #1 ruck because that is a major need IMO.
Menzel was never in question as a ruck, just a min, how tall is he..?

If he makes it back as a key forward, that has definitely gotta b a bonus, hopeful that NV also can get in a good preseason and put some of his skills on display..
Edit - Just a note on the use of "Walkins", always going to b Josh I'm talking about
