Strategy 2015; Player X or Player Y or Player Z

Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

karaoke

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Posts
6,524
Likes
7,993
AFL Club
St Kilda
Interesting,

2014
Shaw - 1667 pts - 18 games
Houli - 1831 pts - 22 games

Bews - 38 pt ave in 2014 (who else did we have on the bench last year to cover Shaw's outs? NBrown this year?)

Shaw + Bews = 1667 + 4*38 = 1819

Then, $50k / $5,375 (~magic number) = 9 SC pts extra you should be able to 'buy' with the extra funds.

22 rounds x 9 SC pts = 198 total sc pts

-

So, for 2014;

Shaw & Bews = 1,819

vs.

Houli + 50k = 2,029

-

Possibly, for 2015;

Shaw & NBrown = (18^ x 97.7*) + (4 x 50) = 1,759 +200 = 1,959

vs.

Houli + 50k = (22 x 84.7*) + 198 = 2,061

-

Food for thought, :confused:

^ seems to be BF consensus of what Shaw will play this year.
* 4 yr SC ave


FWIW
Anyone choose Houli?

Off to a flyer.

Early days I know.

FWIW, I went with Shaw (& Adcock).
 

Asho81

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Posts
1,458
Likes
639
AFL Club
Adelaide
Trading Ollie Wines out..... for a straight swap, whom would be the best option at a similar price?

A. Scotty Thompson
B. David Mundy
C. Pavlich
D. Franklin
E. Ebert

Or should I skip the semi-premium upgrade, burn 2 trades, do a Goodes downgrade, and add one of the following Premiums:
F. Pendles
G. Lewis
H. JSelwood
I. JPK
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2012
Posts
1,625
Likes
2,370
Location
3rd spooky castle on left
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Pittsburgh Steelers Perth Scorchers
Trading Ollie Wines out..... for a straight swap, whom would be the best option at a similar price?

A. Scotty Thompson
B. David Mundy
C. Pavlich
D. Franklin
E. Ebert

Or should I skip the semi-premium upgrade, burn 2 trades, do a Goodes downgrade, and add one of the following Premiums:
F. Pendles
G. Lewis
H. JSelwood
I. JPK
Buddy from the top group. If you were interested in getting rid of Goodes(which I would), I'd suggest Pendles
 

stevebbb

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 21, 2013
Posts
11,936
Likes
22,006
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Arsenal, Fluminense; Blue Jays
I don't get the love for Lewis. Before last years 109 average he had never averaged better than 96 in his previous 9 seasons. And even last year he was averaging only 94 after 11 games. Yes he had an awesome 2nd half to the season & a super 1st 2 games so far this year, but for 588k I'd be wanting someone who has a ultra-premium scoring history of more than a dozen games.
he plays for Hawthorn and racks them up for fun
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Lums23

Club Legend
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Posts
2,791
Likes
3,095
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Manchester United
Krakhead or Tarrant?
Krak by a long way
Trading Ollie Wines out..... for a straight swap, whom would be the best option at a similar price?

A. Scotty Thompson
B. David Mundy
C. Pavlich
D. Franklin
E. Ebert

Or should I skip the semi-premium upgrade, burn 2 trades, do a Goodes downgrade, and add one of the following Premiums:
F. Pendles
G. Lewis
H. JSelwood
I. JPK
I'd be going either Mundy from the top group or Pendles. Probably Pendles from those two as I feel like Goodes has to be traded this week, unless he gets dropped
 

Lums23

Club Legend
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Posts
2,791
Likes
3,095
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Manchester United
What about lachie Neale? Throw him in the mix with pendles, Selwood, JPK
Personally, I started with Neale as my only speculative pick in that 450-550k range. He did only score 90odd and 100odd in the first two weeks, so don't go trying to chase last weeks points. I'm generally more inclined to go with the proven guys like the ones you mentioned if you can afford them. Last week it sounds like you went a proven premo (Sloane?) over Shiel. Just look at how well that worked out for you
 
Last edited:

rocker_oz33

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 15, 2007
Posts
35,119
Likes
24,824
Location
Rockin in a free world.
AFL Club
Geelong
Personally, I started with Neale as my only speculative pick in that 450-550k range. He did only score 90odd and 100odd in the first two weeks, so don't go trying to chase last weeks points. I'm generally more inclined to go with the proven guys like the ones you mentioned if you can afford them. Last week it sounds like you went a proven premo (Sloane?) over Shiel. Just look at how well that worked out for you
Neale was a good choice freo mids bat deep neale can go huge and pretty soild most other weeks.
 

Asho81

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Posts
1,458
Likes
639
AFL Club
Adelaide
Personally, I started with Neale as my only speculative pick in that 450-550k range. He did only score 90odd and 100odd in the first two weeks, so don't go trying to chase last weeks points. I'm generally more inclined to go with the proven guys like the ones you mentioned if you can afford them. Last week it sounds like you went a proven premo (Sloane?) over Shiel. Just look at how well that worked out for you
Good advice putting it into perspective..... I did get Sloane and he killed it. I think Neale is solid, but his overinflated score Today coincided with Fyfe having a down day (by our expectations). Scotty T had a blinder too FWIW.

I have 4 issues that I feel need addressing if I'm continuing for overall;
1. Ollie Wines
2. Goodes (not major IMO as he warms the bench each week).
3. Harley Bennell (no idea why I chose him)
4. Bellchambers.
I need to decide what level mid I want to replace Wines (ie Neale, thommo, pendles, Selwood..... Krak??). Pendles and Selwood are the obvious adds right?

Also, do I keep Harley or Upgrade him to buddy/Roughy; this seems ridiculously sideways and a waste of a trade.

1. Wines + Goodes for Selwood/pendles/Neale + def rookie
2. Wines + Bennell for Thommo/Neale + buddy/roughy/pav
3. Wines for krak (could he average 80/game??), then have $450k to play with
 

rocker_oz33

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 15, 2007
Posts
35,119
Likes
24,824
Location
Rockin in a free world.
AFL Club
Geelong
Going to bring a premo mid will have enough for anyone bar Pendles.
JPK V Beams V Watson V Lewis v prestia v ward last 2 Pods.

Already have parker (but jpk at 590k) also eyeing off rocky unsure if i want beams and rocky also yet to see him play together.
Leaning towards Watson eve tho had him 2 years before bloody feller gets freak injurys.
 

rocker_oz33

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 15, 2007
Posts
35,119
Likes
24,824
Location
Rockin in a free world.
AFL Club
Geelong
Good advice putting it into perspective..... I did get Sloane and he killed it. I think Neale is solid, but his overinflated score Today coincided with Fyfe having a down day (by our expectations). Scotty T had a blinder too FWIW.

I have 4 issues that I feel need addressing if I'm continuing for overall;
1. Ollie Wines
2. Goodes (not major IMO as he warms the bench each week).
3. Harley Bennell (no idea why I chose him)
4. Bellchambers.
I need to decide what level mid I want to replace Wines (ie Neale, thommo, pendles, Selwood..... Krak??). Pendles and Selwood are the obvious adds right?

Also, do I keep Harley or Upgrade him to buddy/Roughy; this seems ridiculously sideways and a waste of a trade.

1. Wines + Goodes for Selwood/pendles/Neale + def rookie
2. Wines + Bennell for Thommo/Neale + buddy/roughy/pav
3. Wines for krak (could he average 80/game??), then have $450k to play with
Unsure if Goodes stays in that side but Webb looked ok dispite hes shit score WB have Morris injuied so Hamling prob just hes chance.
Pendles/Sel and rookie.
get krack the week after.
Bennell will do better once the black hole suns get there sh!te together soild enough atm.
least you dont have jimmy/lids types.
 

Asho81

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Posts
1,458
Likes
639
AFL Club
Adelaide
Unsure if Goodes stays in that side but Webb looked ok dispite hes shit score WB have Morris injuied so Hamling prob just hes chance.
Pendles/Sel and rookie.
get krack the week after.
Bennell will do better once the black hole suns get there sh!te together soild enough atm.
least you dont have jimmy/lids types.
Thinking of;
Wines to Joel Selwood
Goodes to Jake Kelly (crows)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom