A little haha but I do like POD's and I would consider Jack if I had to pick out of the 3 at this very stage. And I would choose Smith.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
2015; Player X or Player Y or Player Z
- Thread starter Ashton Agar
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Man really tough ones, of the first group I would go Ward, Wines, Jack..
Can we also through McGovern into the second group?
D Smith VS Higgins Vs McGovern..
I would not touch Bont for at least 2 more weeks, you could be trading yourself into donuts.
I have Bont.... contemplating whether he's worth holding or not.
So what if we make it D Smith VS Higgins Vs McGovern Vs Bont....
Wait until next week for Bont at the bare minimum.. I wouldn't be moving him if I was you either, waste of a trade.
My feeling is the following: D Smith, Bont, McGov, Higgins.. But McGov and Higgins DPP could be useful if Goddard is named and starts getting games!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
NinjaSwan
Brownlow Medallist
Who would you trade out 1st out of these 4? Need to get rid of 1 of them next week.
Newnes, Hibberd, Oxley, Saad
Newnes, Hibberd, Oxley, Saad
Kardinial
Debutant
- Mar 6, 2015
- 145
- 107
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Saad, just
toxic
Hall of Famer
Base it on b/e between ox and saad
MightyMark
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 18, 2010
- 5,742
- 3,088
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors, NE Patriots
Ox, at least Saad is consistent.
Buddy - but maybe cause i dislike Wingards mug.... I think Bud will have a big, and more consistent second half.
How about Ward vs Wines vs Parker?
- Jun 18, 2013
- 4,884
- 4,852
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
I reckon Ward will have a big back half. I just traded him in and already have Parker.
For me Ward > Parker > Wines but many will say they would have Wines first.
All good choices really, whatever suits byes
Fair Call
I'm not sold one way or the other, but probably have Wines=Ward>Parker at the moment. Wines and Ward have the same byes too, so can't even split them on that!
toxic
Hall of Famer
Did u go the chad?
- Sep 9, 2012
- 15,600
- 22,655
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- EAD Jiska
- Banned
- #4,917
I have to thank you for this post toxic I was all set to upgrade Newnes to Selwood for an extra 55k the other day, but your post made me question that trade, so I did some rookie trading instead and will upgrade 1 of Newnes/Oxley/Saad > Sloane next round instead. The worst performer, with the highest B/E after this round will be the one to be traded out.
Unfortunately no. Went Buddy. Chad has let me down at the best of times before, whereas Buddy seems to go big when I need him too. I think they'll average around the same for the rest of the year though.
MightyMark
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 18, 2010
- 5,742
- 3,088
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors, NE Patriots
Gotta go Ward out of them, agree with FAILTOSUCCEED he looks set to finish big, him and Treloar are looking the goods.
Ward > Parker only just
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Apr 5, 2014
- 13,966
- 26,210
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- My SuperCoach team
Shaw or McGovern to be traded in for MJ?
Shaw an extra $100,000 for an extra 10 points per week
Shaw an extra $100,000 for an extra 10 points per week
rocker_oz33
Make me an Admin!
I'd say more than 10 ppg more gov is getting around 85 a week last few weeks.
Shaw is around 110 av last 5 weeks.
Simpson or Docherty Houli or Rance,Birchall if you can wait a week after there bye.
MightyMark
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 18, 2010
- 5,742
- 3,088
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors, NE Patriots
Shaw is worth the extra cash
- Apr 5, 2014
- 13,966
- 26,210
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- My SuperCoach team
Cheers guys went Shaw 
Thanks dude. Went Ward, avoided wines thankfully (short term at least!)
Houli v Laird
- Status