Remove this Banner Ad

2015; Player X or Player Y or Player Z

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Whooooooosh ;)

I was saying "none of those options" :)
What about Sloane or Hanley SES SA
What he means is JPK & Watson have the bye and Selwoods is R13, so look elsewhere. If you are planning on getting one after their bye I'd go JPK.


Yep, wasn't following at all :D.

I am pretty screwed for this round of the bye, so that's not a concern. Pretty set on bringing in Danger and Sloane for Rich and CEY (whenever). That leaves one spot that I am unsure about, and those 3 guys are the easiest fit. Thompson was another, but that seems like a lot of crows. I could probably down/upgrade to Priddis, if I pushed it, but I was hoping to do that with Tarrant in the forward-line. Possibly Delidio or Goddard.
 
Simpson, Picken or Houli

Pick 1

Thinking the same 3 except with Laird instead of Simpson. Was leaving towards picken because of how consistent he's been since he starting tonning up. Any doggies fans have any insight as to whether they think he'll continue playing the same role?
 
Any reason why? Other than price?

Like I said purely based on opinion and I think Hodges average in inflated by his 177, without that they are alot more even, and Simpson has a better price tag.
 
Like I said purely based on opinion and I think Hodges average in inflated by his 177, without that they are alot more even, and Simpson has a better price tag.
Simpsons average inflated by his 149. take that out and Hodge looks a lot better...plus he has a higher ceiling
 
Simpsons average inflated by his 149. take that out and Hodge looks a lot better...plus he has a higher ceiling

149 is a much more reasonable task for Simpson than 177 is for Hodge.

The point is that whilst Simpson is more than capable of going 140 again, I could say with the upmost confidence that Hodge isnt going to get anything close to 170 again.
 
Hodge > KSimpson everyday of the week...but I wouldn't say no to both.

Hodge playing more midfield minutes and should continue to avg 100 from here. Simpson is likely to have bigger scores but also has plenty games where he does nothing for 3qtrs and seagulls his way to a respectable 90.
 
Hodge > KSimpson everyday of the week...but I wouldn't say no to both.

Hodge playing more midfield minutes and should continue to avg 100 from here. Simpson is likely to have bigger scores but also has plenty games where he does nothing for 3qtrs and seagulls his way to a respectable 90.

Not really to fazed how guys score their points, as long as they are respectable by games end. kind of wish a few more of my players would take advantage of junk time.
 
149 is a much more reasonable task for Simpson than 177 is for Hodge.

The point is that whilst Simpson is more than capable of going 140 again, I could say with the upmost confidence that Hodge isnt going to get anything close to 170 again.
its still 40 points more than his next highest score.
Hodge has got much closer to going 140 again than Simpson
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Dusty v Zorko + 160k

Or put another way,

Dusty v Zorko + a trade
average of 109 with 7 tons v's an average of 84 with 2 tons.
you pay a premo price you get premo scores, pay midprice and get midprice scores.

unless you're in some sort of desperate situation get Dusty
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Which option pls guys:

1) Mckenzie, saad and Tarrant for
Hamling, laird and Lewis (taz via Bont) or;

2) lonie, saad and Tarrant for
Hodge, Shiel and lambert (cop the 0 and play one short, hoping like hell he gets a game soon)

Option 2 leaves me a fwd line after byes of Gray, Martin, Goddard, Swan, Bont, Steele (lambert & lamb)

I know option 1 is safer, but the upside to option 2 in getting hodge and Shiel is appealing
 
Which option pls guys:

1) Mckenzie, saad and Tarrant for
Hamling, laird and Lewis (taz via Bont) or;

2) lonie, saad and Tarrant for
Hodge, Shiel and lambert (cop the 0 and play one short, hoping like hell he gets a game soon)

Option 2 leaves me a fwd line after byes of Gray, Martin, Goddard, Swan, Bont, Steele (lambert & lamb)

I know option 1 is safer, but the upside to option 2 in getting hodge and Shiel is appealing
Personally I would go option 1 but only because I don't like the look of your forward line (Steele at F6 and no cover) if you go option 2. If you can get another forward premo or at least reliable bench cover in next week I would do option 2 but otherwise option 1.
 
Which option pls guys:

1) Mckenzie, saad and Tarrant for
Hamling, laird and Lewis (taz via Bont) or;

2) lonie, saad and Tarrant for
Hodge, Shiel and lambert (cop the 0 and play one short, hoping like hell he gets a game soon)

Option 2 leaves me a fwd line after byes of Gray, Martin, Goddard, Swan, Bont, Steele (lambert & lamb)

I know option 1 is safer, but the upside to option 2 in getting hodge and Shiel is appealing

Can u afford steele instead of lambert
 
Can u afford steele instead of lambert

Already have him. Hoping he plays this week

Option 3 would be newnes, Mckenzie and taz to hodge, Lewis and hamling but I am $100 short. Fancy giving me a loan? Good for it! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top