Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
What about lewis Jetta then? I rate him more highly then the low working jetta
What about lewis Jetta then? I rate him more highly then the low working jetta
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
We get more for anderson than jetta? Swans want a first for him....surely you would rather Anderson?We'll give you brant collegde and a third rounder.
We get more for anderson than jetta? Swans want a first for him....surely you would rather Anderson?
We get more for anderson than jetta? Swans want a first for him....surely you would rather Anderson?
In: Anderson Out: HillAnderson looks a decent talent, but what runs does he have on the board? What role does he play for us next year?
Jetta clearly takes Rosas role next year and makes us a better team running on the wing opposite gaff. That being said, a trade for Jetta hasn't been done yet, so how do you know what we're giving up for him?
All teams overrate their young talent, I like Anderson, but he's not a must get for us. You hold the cards because he's contracted. But if he wants to leave and he nominates us a second rounder and steak knives if we're feeling generous will get it done.
We get more for anderson than jetta? Swans want a first for him....surely you would rather Anderson?
In: Anderson Out: Hill
Pretty easy
We wouldn't be giving up our first rounder for 2016, I can tell you that much. The draft is expected to be stacked with talent - we'd be crazy to part with such a pick. Lycett alone would have greater trade value than Anderson anyway so I think you're dreaming with this one. Maybe Anderson for 2016 second round pick or something - that'd be more reasonable.Jed Anderson has asked if a trade was able to done he would like it done, Eagles are interest.
Heres what id like: 2016 first round and Lycett for Jed and our 3rd pick 2015
What are your thoughts and what would you give.
We wouldn't be giving up our first rounder for 2016, I can tell you that much. The draft is expected to be stacked with talent - we'd be crazy to part with such a pick. Lycett alone would have greater trade value than Anderson anyway so I think you're dreaming with this one. Maybe Anderson for 2016 second round pick or something - that'd be more reasonable.
gotta start high value then work down to the right trade...agree?
Well of course, but keep in mind we're not the recruiting staff of our clubs, so there's really no need for us to barter in this discussion. We can be realistic and say that you would be bending us over and stuffing us from behind with that trade. We'd be expecting a first rounder if we traded Lycett (and with Sinclair looking like he may leave, there's no way we'd be trading Lycett anyway), so that means he'd have higher trade value than Anderson alone.gotta start high value then work down to the right trade...agree?
Hahaha I laughed a fair bit at this oneYou started with the nuclear option though.
Jed Anderson has asked if a trade was able to done he would like it done, Eagles are interest.
Heres what id like: 2016 first round and Lycett for Jed and our 3rd pick 2015
What are your thoughts and what would you give.
Not my fault, I said I wanted to trade him for someone good :/If we lose Sinclair in a straight swap for Jetta, I am blaming Godfather cause he started this s@&t
Well if you start at his actual value after hagling you loose outYou started with the nuclear option though.
This is not the outcome I wanted though....Yep kudos to Godfather32 he was all over it weeks ago.
Here realistic!Well of course, but keep in mind we're not the recruiting staff of our clubs, so there's really no need for us to barter in this discussion. We can be realistic and say that you would be bending us over and stuffing us from behind with that trade. We'd be expecting a first rounder if we traded Lycett (and with Sinclair looking like he may leave, there's no way we'd be trading Lycett anyway), so that means he'd have higher trade value than Anderson alone.
I doubt we'd be prepared to part with more than a second round pick for Anderson, and as others have mentioned already, you guys probably rate Anderson higher internally than we or other clubs would, so you'd probably not accept that offer for him. Could be difficult to get a deal done TBH.
