List Mgmt. 2016 Delisted Free Agents

[BRL121]

Yeah, pre Eddie, we would have fallen over ourselves trying to sign him up. Really surprised that Brisbane let him go, given their attack wouldn't strike fear in an under 13s country boys side

He used to terrorise us when we played Brisbane, but he is nowhere near that player now: no thanks.

 

[Lawrst]

All junk or finished

No, no, no

Wait wait wait....

You're telling me you don't want Tom Lee?

 

[Captain Furious]

Saints delisted Templeton? Surprised by that, would definitely look at him.

In a team where poor kicking is a major issue, why pick up a guy who would automatically become the worst kick in the team. Massive no to Barlow.

 

[Firewalker]

I see the Hawks cut Angus Litherland, he's someone I always thought wasn't a bad defender on either talls or smalls and has a booming leg on him, he's someone we should look at especially with the uncertainty around Shaw's future.

Templeton has some really good qualities about him as well, Henry Schade was a pick 24 for GC back in 2011, 197cm key defender who has been stuck behind May and Thompson most of his career, could do worse than to look at them.

Something the whole industry could get better at is not discarding delisted players so easily from the system without looking at throwing them a lifeline.

 

[Danger Zone]

I see the Hawks cut Angus Litherland, he's someone I always thought wasn't a bad defender on either talls or smalls and has a booming leg on him, he's someone we should look at especially with the uncertainty around Shaw's future.

Templeton has some really good qualities about him as well, Henry Schade was a pick 24 for GC back in 2011, 197cm key defender who has been stuck behind May and Thompson most of his career, could do worse than to look at them.

Something the whole industry could get better at is not discarding delisted players so easily from the system without looking at throwing them a lifeline.

Schade is actually the one I was most interested in. Is a real KPD and that is something we have next to no depth in. I believe we were interested in his draft year.

 

[Thetrader15]

Would you put a hack that no one really wanted because they weren't up to it, in your first 22

Why change our approach now? #400k

 

[passmark]

Morning!

Any chance Grigg will be delisted?

I haven't seen him play much, what's good and bad about him?

 

[marty36]

Why change our approach now? #400k

He was never delisted

Out of the hundreds of players that have been delisted (not traded) how many have achieved anything at another club and there have been hundreds delisted

 

[Ramify]

1st quarter v Syd. Which of either Barlow or Dal might have got their hands on the ball?

Good question. Lyons probably.

Is Dal slower than Barlow?
Does he have a better leg than Barlow?
Are we after accumulators or speed and precision ball movement?

In all honesty, I dont want either of them, but if we are going to go by what the club says it needs then Dalsanto is closer to the mark than Barlow.
If we are after someone to simply rack up disposals then we should have made a play for Rockliff.

 

[1990crow]

Morning!

Any chance Grigg will be delisted?

I haven't seen him play much, what's good and bad about him?

I'd say highly likely he gets delisted.
Good: foot skills and high volume stats.
Bad: Slow. Plays low to the ground. Stuck between AFL and SANFL standard player.

 

[Tex200]

Morning!

Any chance Grigg will be delisted?

I haven't seen him play much, what's good and bad about him?

Will be announced next week that he's been delisted

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

FTR, there's a few DFA's I'd take. Barlow, Templeton, XR, maybe Tape too if Shaw retires.

I would prefer to upgrade keath for Shaw.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

I thought everyone wanted to give the likes if Wigg, CEY, Menzel, Hampton a crack or are they list cloggers by bringing in a player that one of the bottom teams couldn't find a spot for probably so they can promote youth like we want to do!

I think most do.

Bringing in Barlow would be as experienced depth to our midfield at the expense of a grigg or hendo - not playing ahead of youngsters.

Consider Thommo won't play many games, neither will mackay, doubt over Douglas recapturing form... leaves us potentially inexperienced in the midfield. Need some experience around the younger guys.

 

[passmark]

I'd say highly likely he gets delisted.
Good: foot skills and high volume stats.
Bad: Slow. Plays low to the ground. Stuck between AFL and SANFL standard player.

Thanks, 1990.

Sounds just like the kind of player we scoop up unfortunately .

 

[Bicks]

Saints delisted Templeton? Surprised by that, would definitely look at him.

In a team where poor kicking is a major issue, why pick up a guy who would automatically become the worst kick in the team. Massive no to Barlow.

At least we agree on that one, like you I'm certain Eli would be a good addition to list our with his electric pace, run and carry and nice skill set. The bonus is he's very dangerous around goals. Handy back up as he's capable of outside mid/wing/small forward roles.

 

[marty36]

I think most do.

Bringing in Barlow would be as experienced depth to our midfield at the expense of a grigg or hendo - not playing ahead of youngsters.

Consider Thommo won't play many games, neither will mackay, doubt over Douglas recapturing form... leaves us potentially inexperienced in the midfield. Need some experience around the younger guys.

By giving Thommo a contract I think that is the spot in the list that would suit Barlow do we need two of them?

 

[Pugsley]

Wait wait wait....

You're telling me you don't want Tom Lee?

Spike Lee got game not Tom Lee.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

By giving Thommo a contract I think that is the spot in the list that would suit Barlow do we need two of them?

Thommo is only going to play a handful or so games. imo, we need at least 1 experienced player in the side around the younger guys.

 

[fabs33]

At least we agree on that one, like you I'm certain Eli would be a good addition to list our with his electric pace, run and carry and nice skill set. The bonus is he's very dangerous around goals. Handy back up as he's capable of outside mid/wing/small forward roles.

Why was he delisted?

 

[Bicks]

Why was he delisted?

Well according to Saints supporters they have too many like him.....we certainly don't...his speed and run and carry is very tantalising.

 

[Pugsley]

Well according to Saints supporters they have too many like him.....we certainly don't...his speed and run and carry is very tantalising.

Like a zinger burger

 

[Ramify]

Thanks, 1990.

Sounds just like the kind of player we scoop up unfortunately .

I rate him higher than both of Kedge and Wright if that is any consolation .

 

[crows dude]

Morning!

Any chance Grigg will be delisted?

I haven't seen him play much, what's good and bad about him?

Elite leg but has no pace. I'm hoping he stays and proves people wrong

 

[Tex200]

Elite leg but has no pace. I'm hoping he stays and proves people wrong

He's gone

 

[Scorpus]

Grigg is the definition of "not AFL standard".

Good at SANFL level, one of the better midfielders there, but he just isn't good enough at AFL level