List Mgmt. 2016 Draft - It was on last Friday.

Remove this Banner Ad

Next year is supposed to be high on good talls. Two firsts should allow us to draft in the next generation of talls. Or trade in a superstar. Great trading this year to create the opportunity.

Anyway at 27 we will have the choice of about 5 or so good players by the sound of it. Bishop would know more. But the draft 'experts' are saying that the top 30-35 are good (top 8 outstanding), then it drops off. So a nice pick. I would go a low risk good reward medium of smaller player.

Next year is load up on talls time.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Next year is supposed to be high on good talls. Two firsts should allow us to draft in the next generation of talls. Or trade in a superstar. Great trading this year to create the opportunity.

Anyway at 27 we will have the choice of about 5 or so good players by the sound of it. Bishop would know more. But the draft 'experts' are saying that the top 30-35 are good (top 8 outstanding), then it drops off. So a nice pick. I would go a low risk good reward medium of smaller player.

Next year is load up on talls time.

The best of the talls are aligned to Acadamies apparently....
 
The best of the talls are aligned to Acadamies apparently....
Bugger. Still a good one or two might slip to us.

We need one of them academies. Maybe northern Victoria might have some decent indigenous/non-traditional talent.
 
Is it worth selecting Cedric cox with pick 27 and do you think that Joshua rotham could slide to our pick 27
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Exactly, not big but huge. Sorry for the confusion, tigs2010 has ADD and never completes posts. Its common for girls under 12
What's that saying about those that have don't brag and those that don't brag
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top