Remove this Banner Ad

Analysis 2016 Draft...

  • Thread starter Thread starter FAITH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Who do you realistically want @13?


  • Total voters
    330
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Matt Balmer has us taking Cumming, Begley, Lipinski and Ratugolea.

https://afl draft central.com.au/2016/11/24/matt-balmers-2016-phantom-draft/ (take the spaces out between afl, draft and central)

Feel like our interest in Ratugolea is there, Balmer and Twomey have linked us to him now...
I think that looks almost possible
 
Matt Balmer has us taking Cumming, Begley, Lipinski and Ratugolea.

https://afl draft central.com.au/2016/11/24/matt-balmers-2016-phantom-draft/ (take the spaces out between afl, draft and central)

Feel like our interest in Ratugolea is there, Balmer and Twomey have linked us to him now...


This is ridiculous

I know two SA boys whom spoke with every AFL club that obviously means every club has interest in them on this theory
 
Out of the poll who is the best outside inside mid?
Venables has potential to be , SPP or Galluci prob at this stage though

The thing with pick 13 is everyone has weakness or potentially more upside to what they've shown

In the top 5 or so they're more proven
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Huh

That we reportedly have interest I have no doubt the crows spoke to 60 lads they don't have interest in all, do they?
Wtf

I'm asking if the two SA boys that all clubs have apparently shown interest in are not in the phantom? It sounded that way.
 
I feel the leaks are on purpose to influence other teams to get them off the scent..
Reading into what Hamish said the player we pick at 13 will be mentally strong as well as being talented.. just saying
 
We've been linked with so many players. Who knows what the hell will happen. Not keen on Gallucci. Looked at Cumming's highlight reel and he's actually a pretty good mover. Good speed and skills. Would be ok with Berry/Hayward.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

He may have even nailed
He may have even nailed it, going off who we're apparently keen on. That is, unless GWS matches for Cumming, of course. In that case, we'll probably go Hayward, Gallucci or even C Cox.
landsberger reckons they will

I think we will then go cox Galluci or Hayward

It just seems we are looking at some zip despite what Hamish said about ' not hell bent '
 
Okay, question for you all - who would you prefer out of Cumming and Gallucci?
Galluci

Reckon Cumming has higher potential but far higher risk . Had one game all year over 20 possessions at that was in maccas cup in sanfl

He's not competitive enough for my liking , ticks boxes otherwise
 
Galluci

Reckon Cumming has higher potential but far higher risk . Had one game all year over 20 possessions at that was in maccas cup in sanfl

He's not competitive enough for my liking , ticks boxes otherwise
Yeah same. Cumming's ceiling is higher, but Gallucci has a lot of zip about him too. His kicking is actually very good when he doesn't rush his decision making. Like his balance of inside and outside. Got him ranked at about 20.
landsberger reckons they will

I think we will then go cox Galluci or Hayward

It just seems we are looking at some zip despite what Hamish said about ' not hell bent '
Seems like Cox is a little off the radar now

Toss a coin between Gallucci and Hayward, I reckon
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yeah same. Cumming's ceiling is higher, but Gallucci has a lot of zip about him too. His kicking is actually very good when he doesn't rush his decision making. Like his balance of inside and outside. Got him ranked at about 20.

Seems like Cox is a little off the radar now

Toss a coin between Gallucci and Hayward, I reckon
Not so sure re Cox - these journos don't know for sure

Think we will definitely bid on Cumming but Sydney might before us , 2 clubs not afraid to go against the grain

Hayward is the smoky but Galluci more likely IMO
 
Not so sure re Cox - these journos don't know for sure

Think we will definitely bid on Cumming but Sydney might before us , 2 clubs not afraid to go against the grain

Hayward is the smoky but Galluci more likely IMO
Yeah could be right, it does seem like we prefer others though, no-one has us going for Cox. Can never say for sure.

Yeah that could be why he was invited, Twomey did say that Syd have interest in Cumming. Could happen, they need zip badly.

Honestly can not pick it at this stage, but if I had to say one, I'd say Gallucci. If Berry got past WCE, I'd say him.
 
Yeah I'd prefer others too, for sure, but it doesn't look like it'll be that way.
Twomey I'd hold some stock in what he's across with the clubs on the U18's, Sam Landsberger not so much and from the sound of it Emma Quayle has stepped back a fair bit too this season so I reckon it's still very open.
 
Twomey I'd hold some stock in what he's across with the clubs on the U18's, Sam Landsberger not so much and from the sound of it Emma Quayle has stepped back a fair bit too this season so I reckon it's still very open.
Reckon he's clutching at straws a bit too this time !!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom