2016 FEDERAL ELECTION GUIDE – who are you voting for?

Remove this Banner Ad

88% Greens, 87% Labor, 65% Liberal, 51% Family First

This quiz is a deadset joke as I'd rather go to hell at this present moment than vote for the first 2.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

My grandchildren will thank me when I am dead.

True, but probably for that sole reason.;)
We'll mourn you here too.
No doubt the Tax department will mourn your huge contribution, being Australia's richest internet forum contributor.
 
Parties you side with...

95% Labor on economic, social, domestic policy, foreign policy, environmental, healthcare, immigration, and education issues.

94% Greens on economic, foreign policy, domestic policy, social, healthcare, and education issues.

80% Democratic Labour on economic, environmental, healthcare, and education issues.

68% Katter's Australian on economic, environmental, and healthcare issues.

65% Liberals on domestic policy, social, and healthcare issues.

62% Palmer United on healthcare issues.

60% Liberal Democrats on social and criminal issues.

54% Family First no major issues.

Your ideology...

Left-Wing - Your political beliefs would be considered moderately Left-Wing on an ideological scale, meaning you tend to support policies that promote social and economic equality.


http://australia.isidewith.com/results/2392597259
 
I'll probably end up voting greens as their balance of power in the senate is likely to be important under a reelected government.

I think jobs are important. Starting wars on centrelink customers, cutting funding to education and research and making it easier for 457s to be hired has the opposite effect to job creation and making locals employable.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hey Ratts of Tobruk. Can you tell me how I should be voting tomorrow? I have no idea what to do below the line, I was thinking of voting for a shitload of independants or whatever will hinder the liberals most in passing their zombie cuts next term. Cheers.
Interesting. This bit in particular:
The one principle of tactical voting I recommend to those who really want to do it is do not vote 1 for any candidate who you know will get elected more or less straightaway. Generally a strategic voter would therefore avoid a 1 vote for the first four major party candidates in a state, and in most states they'd avoid voting 1 for the top Greens candidate. Voting below the line and starting at the bottom of your preferred party ticket - if you're a major party voter - is a common trick... (The possible downside of this method is that your originally preferred party misses out on a few dollars of public funding. For people who think no parties should be funded, that's a benefit.)...If you vote 1 for someone who is going to be elected right off the bat, you are giving them a vote they do not need. A portion of your vote is in effect left behind with them when their surplus is passed on, and your ballot paper in effect carries on to other candidates at a reduced value.
Given the above, Benny, I will go below-the-line, even though you can now vote preferentially above the line.

As I said in the OP I'm looking at Labor, Xenaphon, centrist and progressive parties, plus that idea of rewarding the Senators from the term just gone for actually doing a good job and not deserving to be kicked out. Plus Derryn Hinch, because I want prison/sentencing reform. There isn't any individual in particular I'd look to avoid below-the-line but the IPA are pretty extreme and James Paterson got the much-sought-after #4 spot on the Liberal ticket even though the Liberals had claimed they were going to get a woman in (they have no female Senators in Victoria). Conroy for Labor is a factional heavy-hitter so he could be avoided too if you don't like that sort of out-sized influence. Hinch is in the #1 spot on the ballot itself, so is probably the best bet for getting a different person in, but I would say he will certainly work with either party so won't discourage the Liberals like you would like to do. Muir similarly I think would look to be more cooperative than last time, when he seemed to fall under the sway of Xenaphon.

For you, I am guessing a bit, I assume you're in Vic? I'd recommend Green then maybe some single issue/progressive parties that aren't Liberals-associated: Marriage Equality, Arts Party, Drug Law Reform, Secular Party, Pirate Party, Science/Cyclists, Voluntary Euthanasia, Renewables, Aus Progressives, Animal Justice. If you really feel that hard about it chuck the two Socialist parties in here. The Sex Party is progressive in many ways, but are also a lot about freedom, so would potentially side with those libertarian aspects of the Liberals. I would say you'd prefer Labor, Xenaphon and even the Democrats (Group B) before them. And Hinch. If Sustainable Australia are people like Dick Smith (who is also worried about natural resources and population) then they'd be relatively left-wing anti-immigration types. Then Ricky Muir in the Motoring Party and Sex Party next. Then DLP and MFP and Jackie Lambie. Health Australia are anti-vaccination crazies, so their 'natural medicine' claims I guess might make them anti-Liberal, but they probably would have no problem with health cuts as they don't like the professional health world. I wouldn't vote for them (nor the other Crazy guys - Citizens Electorate Council). Then you are pretty much stuck with people who are bound to pick Liberals, but Clive Palmer might still be so annoyed by the Libs that he's worth first spot on your 'lesser of evils' section and VoteFlux is hard to predict, because it depends on who their members. Social conservatives may assocaite charity with their Christianity and not want to cut Govt. Maybe. Anti-Islam types similarly can be religious themselves. Then the country parties, and finally Liberal Democrats because they are all about cutting Government. I may have got some wrong, but that's the impression I've got.
 
True, but probably for that sole reason.;)
We'll mourn you here too.
No doubt the Tax department will mourn your huge contribution, being Australia's richest internet forum contributor.
I have to say, at the very least you have a sense of humour unlike some who ply their banter in this threads.:thumbsu:
 
Patting yourself on the back for taking your own joke well?

Who do the mid twenties lady homeowners with a nurse girlfriend and steady job around vote for?
Liberal. Because you can afford to just stick it out and wait a while.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top