Remove this Banner Ad

2016 Forwards

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

You played 15/22 from last years best.

They played 11/22.
You mised the point. It's NAB.

We moved the ball like a bunch of Aus Kickers.
Not exactly showing our gameplan or trying to exectue anything over the top.
 
"Young slow WC boys" is the quote, you're missing the point.
So the point is Hall tackled a lot because we had a higher percentage of "young slow WC boys" out there?

What the hell that has to do with us playing 15/22 to their 11/22 has got we stumped.
It's NAB. We could have played the GF 22 minus Rosa and Simclair, replaced them with Jetta and Lycett, added Duggan, Redden and still sucked.

The ground, conditions, effort, rotations are all aimed without 4 points in mind.
 
The issue I see with Hall is what happens when O'Meara and Swallow come back. Do you really want someone to average 100+ for the first half of the season and 70 for the rest of it?

They won't be back

And if his scores consistently drop you trade him.out
 

Remove this Banner Ad

So the point is Hall tackled a lot because we had a higher percentage of "young slow WC boys" out there?

What the hell that has to do with us playing 15/22 to their 11/22 has got we stumped.
It's NAB. We could have played the GF 22 minus Rosa and Simclair, replaced them with Jetta and Lycett, added Duggan, Redden and still sucked.

The ground, conditions, effort, rotations are all aimed without 4 points in mind.
Correct, I don't understand the quote provided by Double The Fist, as it's just not true and it's irrelevant to Halls score.
 
Correct, I don't understand the quote provided by Double The Fist, as it's just not true and it's irrelevant to Halls score.
SC. Everything's irrelevant except your weekly score. :rainbow::D
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Zorko, nobody seems to have him in their sides, not much talk about him. Is he non relevant anymore? Personally, I think he may be okay to average 100. Missed four games since his debut. Strong consideration.
He's very expensive. He has a history of starting slow. He scored big last year when Beams was out.
I reckon he's a big risk, because he could easily give you an ~80 average.
 
He's very expensive. He has a history of starting slow. He scored big last year when Beams was out.
I reckon he's a big risk, because he could easily give you an ~80 average.

I'm not starting with him either, but even if he plays permanent half forward I can still see him getting 22 plus touches / 1goal / 6 tackles / 90+ points a game.

He isn't too disimiliar to Dahlhaus and he is a potential upgrade for me, especially if he drops to the low $400k range.
 
Yep he's in for me.

The fact he's also a DPP means he could end up F6/M8-9 and provide very decent cover across 2 lines. I'll pay 428k for that.
Agree. With GC's injuries he's more appealing to me atm than Stringer, who until a few minutes ago was my speculative F4. DPP pretty much seals the deal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top