NFL 2016 NFL - Week 11

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Cooper sighting, * that man is good after the catch, not many wideouts can gain what he can consistently on screen passes.

 

[juice t]

Now I'm not sure if it's Frank Caliendo or the real Jon Gruden

 

[Kram]

72 million.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

How low have all our snaps been.

Amari. Not bad. But still not giving the D much of a breather.

Centre adjusting how high he snap's it cause of the high altitude?

 

[manureid]

2 clean interceptions dropped in this game. Cannot afford this.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

lolweiller, 3rd and long and throws short of the sticks. ******* clown.

 

[LicoriceAllsorts]

That's game

 

[sblack]

 

[Kram]

And the Raiders roll on!

 

[sblack]

Also, BoB decision to punt on 4th and 3 was so ******* dumb.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Oaklando winning ugly, its what good teams do. Booking wins like that is huge.

 

[TheGreatBarryB]

Felt sorry for the refs having those lasers shone in their eyes. How else do you explain the call of oob on Hopkins and those ridiculous spots. Didn't think Brock was too bad, yeah the INT was a shocker and should have had another, had some nice tight passes and good call at the line to get Miller in.

How bad was our call on 1st & goal on the 1 and we call a play action pass to LT Brown!! **** me!! Then Brock catches his own pass and costs us 6 yards....got the TD anyway but still.

A prediction for the future....Clowney > Mack.

 

[Chewy316]

Raider pass rush has been shite tonight.

Ostweiler was pressured on over 50% of his drop backs. It was the highest rate this week according to Pro Football Focus. Not sure how much more you can expect Mack and Irvin (and co) to do when the QB is throwing off 3 steps (at most) 90+ % of the time.

 

[Muffed Punt]

Oaklando winning ugly, its what good teams do. Booking wins like that is huge.

Totally agree, except the "good teams" word

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Ostweiler was pressured on over 50% of his drop backs. It was the highest rate this week according to Pro Football Focus. Not sure how much more you can expect Mack and Irvin (and co) to do when the QB is throwing off 3 steps (at most) 90+ % of the time.

Just because youre content with pro football focus ratings doesnt mean i have to be, Chewy.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

A prediction for the future....Clowney > Mack.

 

[manureid]

Clowney was pick 1... mack pick 5. He is supposed to be better.


Still would not swap.

 

[Blacky]

Clowney was pick 1... mack pick 5. He is supposed to be better.


Still would not swap.

Bortles > Carr then

 

[Chewy316]

Just because youre content with pro football focus ratings doesnt mean i have to be, Chewy.

The stats that I brought up aren't PFF ratings. I'm merely pointing to the raw statistical data numbers that show Oakland's pass rush this week put the most pressure on any QB (as a percentage of drop backs) this week.

 

[manureid]

Bortles > Carr then

Yep.


Would not swap those either.

 

[larkis]

Clowney was pick 1... mack pick 5. He is supposed to be better.


Still would not swap.

Before the draft people were saying Mack was the best prospect available.

So everyone let him drop to the Raiders.
Should of been the easiest #2 pick in the draft for the Rams.

 

[ChockNurris]

Before the draft people were saying Mack was the best prospect available.

So everyone let him drop to the Raiders.
Should of been the easiest #2 pick in the draft for the Rams.

This is not true, Clowney's atheletic ability made him the best defensive prospect. Injuries have been the only thing holding him back.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Considering Mack is already a top 3 OLB/DE i struggle to see how Clowney will be better than him in the future. Mack would have to go backwards significantly.

Miller, JJ, Mack. Not much room at the top for Clowney. Would have to come on huge from here on in.

 

[manureid]

Clowney still improving. Just needs to stay healthy. Played pretty well against us.

 

[rumply]

I'm watching the last quarter of yesterday's game & have just seen the Texans 4th down run being marked short & just assumed the spot challenge would just reverse the obvious officials * up...but no...so the fix was in eh...


& as the commentators mentioned, it was a play that resulted in a change of possession so should have automatically been reviewed anyway...so why the need for a challenge?