There is a concept in finance called risk adjusted return; really basic, you calibrate the risk + price you are willing to take on against the potential returns.
And you balance that across a portfolio to work towards the result you are after.
Freeman and JOM are like speculative mining stocks, big risks with high potential rewards.
If the price meets the risk adjusted return goals and the potential loss is covered somewhere else then we should go for them (freeman done, JOM a maybe).
A draft pick has a different set of risk adjusted returns, so the list managers will just have to weigh up what the price is at which below JOM is the better bet or a draft pick is a better bet.
Personally I think the risk is too high with JOM unless the price is a pick around 15+
And you balance that across a portfolio to work towards the result you are after.
Freeman and JOM are like speculative mining stocks, big risks with high potential rewards.
If the price meets the risk adjusted return goals and the potential loss is covered somewhere else then we should go for them (freeman done, JOM a maybe).
A draft pick has a different set of risk adjusted returns, so the list managers will just have to weigh up what the price is at which below JOM is the better bet or a draft pick is a better bet.
Personally I think the risk is too high with JOM unless the price is a pick around 15+
I agree on JOM. We really have to start going back to the draft and finding our own. If we get Stringer or Bontempelli with that first pick we don't need to keep buying up guys who might not play.
