List Mgmt. 2016 Trade Thread

[Klyntonius]

You can go your own way pal, it's because I want to be with them everywhere.

I just keep thinking about tomorrow and hoping it'll be better than before.

 

[CWaffles]

Ben Long, kicked 5 already for doggies in the VFL nephew of Michael....I like what i see.

 

[00Stinger]

http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/whi...d/news-story/16dae5f6abd75c2431cfa3fa4b689fbc

This article thinks we should go after Boomer ... I'd be for it personally.

Also suggested Hamish Hartlett (yes if the price is right, always like a talented 23 year old ) and Daniel Wells (Pass, far too injury prone. Albeit seriously talented)

I would be spewing if we picked up Boomer, i hate that cocky little midget

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

 

[Crusty Demon]

I would be spewing if we picked up Boomer, i hate that cocky little midget

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

Absolutely do not need! We have Kent, Garlett and Kennedy playing a similar role. I'd be very disappointed if we trade in a 38 year old into a position we have covered! FFS!

Wells and Hartlett on the other hand although injury prone, are exactly the type of player we need. Outside class with experience. Would be happy to take a punt on either tbh.

 

[booshboy]

Apparently Sicily is being talked about as being tradeable for the Hawks to get their deals done. Potential Hogan replacement? What would he be worth?

 

[Klyntonius]

Apparently Sicily is being talked about as being tradeable for the Hawks to get their deals done. Potential Hogan replacement? What would he be worth?

Dean Terlich.

Don't want Sicily and definitely don't want to help Hawthorn get O'Meara.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

Apparently Sicily is being talked about as being tradeable for the Hawks to get their deals done. Potential Hogan replacement? What would he be worth?

Mid sized forward who's best skill is ducking his head. Pass.

 

[Russian Demon]

Apparently Sicily is being talked about as being tradeable for the Hawks to get their deals done. Potential Hogan replacement? What would he be worth?

Absolutely NO on Sicily. A mid sized piss-weak forward who has only achieved any success on the back of getting sterling service from an elite midfield. Will be an absolute potato when he actually has to do the work to get it inside 50 (ala Hogan). In addition, he's got massive stocks on himself.

 

[PerfectFooty]

Dean Terlich.

Don't want Sicily and definitely don't want to help Hawthorn get O'Meara.

You jinxed it. Now it's bound to happen

 

[Proper Gander]

I hope you all realise that Sicily is dangerously punchable so can't come to Melbourne - also I think it was established that we can't take Boomer because we will have to shoot his dick off. At least I think that's what was agreed.

 

[Russian Demon]

I hope you all realise that Sicily is dangerously punchable so can't come to Melbourne - also I think it was established that we can't take Boomer because we will have to shoot his dick off. At least I think that's what was agreed.

As pointed out, unless we have an elite set shot, shooting Boomer's dick off may be problematic

 

[Gysberts2Bate]

Sicily is shithouse and if he ends up getting Hawthorn the currency they need to get O'Meara or Mitchell the trade manager responsible should be shot.

 

[Sando22]

Please please please let us not end up with Sicily.

 

[efcboy]

Sorry for the intrusion - thoughts on a possible 3 way deal with Hogan involved.

WC - gain Hogan - lose Darling and pick 12.
Ess - gain Darling - lose Hibberd and pick 19.
Mel - gain Hibberd, pick 12, pick 19 - lose Hogan.

 

[Sando22]

Sorry for the intrusion - thoughts on a possible 3 way deal with Hogan involved.

WC - gain Hogan - lose Darling and pick 12.
Ess - gain Darling - lose Hibberd and pick 19.
Mel - gain Hibberd, pick 12, pick 19 - lose Hogan.

We would most certainly take that although we know we're a lock to get Hibberd anyway so unsure whether we'd need to include him in the deal.

 

[efcboy]

We would most certainly take that although we know we're a lock to get Hibberd anyway so unsure whether we'd need to include him in the deal.

Well you save pick 26 by doing that deal with Hibberd included.

Ideally you'd want Hogan to stay but if he's going to leave you may as well get it done now and pick up a guy like battle or Marshall with that pick 12 - and pick 19 is likely to be pretty handy.

 

[Sando22]

Well you save pick 26 by doing that deal with Hibberd included.

Ideally you'd want Hogan to stay but if he's going to leave you may as well get it done now and pick up a guy like battle or Marshall with that pick 12 - and pick 19 is likely to be pretty handy.

Yeah I suppose.
I just feel like if we're losing Hogan we'd want a player in return as we're happy to do 26 for Hibberd.
Unsure if the club would want 3 early picks this year, we have kids. Need players.

 

[Sir Hugh Percy]

Well you save pick 26 by doing that deal with Hibberd included.

Ideally you'd want Hogan to stay but if he's going to leave you may as well get it done now and pick up a guy like battle or Marshall with that pick 12 - and pick 19 is likely to be pretty handy.

I'd think we could get more for Hogan than essentially a late first and two second rounds. Besides, we don't need picks to get more kids to spend another couple of years developing them before we're a shot.

 

[TheCount]

Well you save pick 26 by doing that deal with Hibberd included.

Ideally you'd want Hogan to stay but if he's going to leave you may as well get it done now and pick up a guy like battle or Marshall with that pick 12 - and pick 19 is likely to be pretty handy.

But we'd want a ready made replacement for Hogan, which Darling would be, so we'd be better off with just taking Darling and 12, rather than no Darling, but having 19 and 26

Works in theory, but not so much in practice

 

[Marc_Remillard]

We would most certainly take that although we know we're a lock to get Hibberd anyway so unsure whether we'd need to include him in the deal.

I would hate that trade, Hibberd is a so-so player in his late 20's and pick 12 and 19 most likely won't get an elite kid.

 

[Marc_Remillard]

Well you save pick 26 by doing that deal with Hibberd included.

Ideally you'd want Hogan to stay but if he's going to leave you may as well get it done now and pick up a guy like battle or Marshall with that pick 12 - and pick 19 is likely to be pretty handy.

Lose Hogan and save pick 26.

Wow...

 

[Sando22]

I would hate that trade, Hibberd is a so-so player in his late 20's and pick 12 and 19 most likely won't get an elite kid.

Hate is a bit strong. It's not far off

 

[Marc_Remillard]

Hate is a bit strong. It's not far off

C'mon, compare that to what we used to get Hogan in the first place.

 

[Sando22]

C'mon, compare that to what we used to get Hogan in the first place.

What we used to get Hoges counts for f*** all if he wants to leave mate

 

[Marc_Remillard]

What we used to get Hoges counts for f*** all if he wants to leave mate

It's a much closer representation of his value than that suggestion. That would be disastrous for us if we lost a contracted young elite key forward for that trade. We might as well put up the 'free to good home' sign if we roll over that easily this year.

Edit: I forgot that we get to keep pick 26