- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #2,651
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think themed games for a cause (in this case lbgtq recognition) actually might be a reason for the good crowd. Maddies match is another example.35,773 at the SCG is a pretty good crowd.
You have had a few more low crowds of recent times, and I get the feeling that the fan level of disenchantment with the club is higher now than it would have been in 2005.
I reckon at the MCG with the poor weather it would have got mid - high 20s.
I think themed games for a cause (in this case lbgtq recognition) actually might be a reason for the good crowd. Maddies match is another example.
The parramatta Vs Wests NRL match yesterday had a cause theme for the Kelly family due to one son dying to a coward punch and another son losing their life to suicide. The match got 30k which is a rarity for a Sydney NRL fixture.
Im in a regional NSW town so Im not sure of the promotion in Sydney, but I do know there was alot of chatter about it on RL forums which I summise may have added to the awareness.I don't know about that. Dropping from 2nd in 2003 to bottom 4 in 2004 and then opening 1-8 in 2005 was *ahem* not very popular at the time.
Interesting. I wasn't yet aware of that NRL crowd, which is indeed a rare thing. Was there much promotion/hype around the Pride Game concept up there?
The parramatta Vs Wests NRL match yesterday had a cause theme for the Kelly family due to one son dying to a coward punch and another son losing their life to suicide.
.
Very interesting.Something you don't see very often.....
http://www.gwsgiants.com.au/news/2017-07-24/two-games-one-ticket
Should happen a bit more TBH.
I think the Storm did it for their Anzac day games a few years ago?Very interesting.
Has such an arrangement ever happened before in Aust. with 2 different football codes?
I am a bit surprised that the NRL are agreeing to this. The NRL is, by far, the dominant code in GWS -AF only has a very small (but growing) following in GWS. Why would the NRL want to provide an advantage to its "upstart"competitor - a competitor that, in a few decades, MIGHT be a genuine competitor?
The NRL was deliberately scheduling local NRL games concurrently against GWS & GC home games. This was assumed to be a policy to diminish the local AFL's game media coverage/crowd/ratings etc. Recently, RL officials have stated publicly that they regard the AFL as a competitor.
I think the Storm did it for their Anzac day games a few years ago?
I am a bit surprised that the NRL are agreeing to this. The NRL is, by far, the dominant code in GWS -AF only has a very small (but growing) following in GWS. Why would the NRL want to provide an advantage to its "upstart"competitor - a competitor that, in a few decades, MIGHT be a genuine competitor?
I think Brisbane Roar and Brisbane Lions did something like this at some point last yearVery interesting.
Has such an arrangement ever happened before in Aust. with 2 different football codes?
Very interesting.
Has such an arrangement ever happened before in Aust. with 2 different football codes?
I am a bit surprised that the NRL are agreeing to this. The NRL is, by far, the dominant code in GWS -AF only has a very small (but growing) following in GWS. Why would the NRL want to provide an advantage to its "upstart"competitor - a competitor that, in a few decades, MIGHT be a genuine competitor?
The NRL was deliberately scheduling local NRL games concurrently against GWS & GC home games. This was assumed to be a policy to diminish the local AFL's game media coverage/crowd/ratings etc. Recently, RL officials have stated publicly that they regard the AFL as a competitor.
I think Brisbane Roar and Brisbane Lions did something like this at some point last year
I think it's great and can only be beneficial for both clubs who take part
I have always wondered if it would be possible for Melbourne City in the A-League to somehow become affiliated with one of the larger AFL clubs in Melbourne.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Being only one of two teams in a city, it wouldn't make sense to align yourself with only 10% of the footy fans in the same city.
Given the feral hatred of AFL in the more hard core of the soccer community, this is highly unlikely to ever happen.Probably more for a thread about City, but after 6-7 years of existence and still only getting about a 9k average to their home games, creating an affiliation with a club like the pies, tigers or Hawks with 70000 members that instantly will feel somewhat of a connection to a team that plays during the 6 months of a year they crave sporting action can only help in my opinion.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Would've thought the Swans-Hawks would be bigger. Friday night, both teams in good form. Considering they got 70,000 two years ago, I would've thought they'd get close to that...MCG predicting 53k for Hawthorn/Sydney and 36k for Collingwood/Adelaide.
I'm hoping they're at least a couple under for the Pies. Hawks one sounds about right.
Would've thought the Swans-Hawks would be bigger. Friday night, both teams in good form. Considering they got 70,000 two years ago, I would've thought they'd get close to that...
Given the feral hatred of AFL in the more hard core of the soccer community, this is highly unlikely to ever happen.
Home Crowds estimates by end of the season
1. Richmond 608,198 (55,291) Hawthorn 67,488 St.Kilda 52,663
2. Essendon 559,555 (50,869) Carlton 63,521 Adelaide 41,525 Fremantle 35,288
3. Collingwood 524,988 (47,727) Adelaide 37,559 Geelong 51,232 Melbourne 53,625
4. Adelaide 519,479 (47,225) Port Power 52,611 Sydney 50,211