Eaglespur
Premiership Player
firstwhy is Gaff on a bench he's our third most dangerous mid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
firstwhy is Gaff on a bench he's our third most dangerous mid.
That was Freo close to full strength only missing Neale, Sandi and Bennel who has yet to play a game for them. I think Freo are bottom 4 material but their midfield is usually their strength.showed great poise against a weak freo and used the ball very well
good signs
That was Freo close to full strength only missing Neale, Sandi and Bennel who has yet to play a game for them. I think Freo are bottom 4 material but their midfield is usually their strength.
Haha yeah heard that excuse used a bit also apparently it was our grand final lol Freo are irrelevant they will be down the bottom of the ladder.B b b b but remember that was their first game of the year..................just like it was the first game for 12 of our best 22 players who didn't travel 9,000 km last week.
Hurn, Le cras, McGovern, Darling, Sheppard, Butler, Gaff, Mitchell, Shuey, Hill, Kennedy and Priddis didn't play last week.
It would be interesting to see what difference Sandilands would have made at the centre bounces.
Redden no where near the side?Best 22 for round 1.
Shep Gov Barras
Hurn Schoey Wellingham
Gaff Priddis Sheed
Darling Petrie Cripps
Hill JK Lecra
Ruck: Vardy, Shuey, Mitchell
Bench: Jetta, Yeo, Hutchings,Nelson
Emergencies Duggan Masten Emac
Noticeable Absent . Nic Nat , Slyce
Masten put up a fair case to be included in the 22 in jlt 2 . In which case Nelson or Hutchings will be emergencies
Would be form dependant - I can see Vardy keeping his spot ahead of Giles
I agree- although I think the buzzword we are using for our rucks is "contest" so it's almost as if we are conceding the hit out and just to make sure the opposition ruckman doesn't have an easy hit out the other way.If Lycett is out I think Giles is a better first ruck option than Vardy, because your first ruck actually does need to be able to consistently win hitouts.
Conversely if Lycett is available, Vardy is probably a better backup ruck option than Giles. He's more versatile and will add more around the ground when Lycett is resting, which is what you want if you're going to name a second big man on the bench.
The ache inside when I think how much I miss nicnat is real and not at all homo.
Masten Nelson and EMac ahead of him .Redden no where near the side?
Wanting a double helping of Nelson is only natural!Yeah that's it. Switched Nelson off the bench and forgot to change Vardy after I took him out of the pocket.
It would be very disappointing if we never get to see Naitanui and Mitchell on field at the same time.There is one major reason why I'd love to see Mitchell play on next year. How awesome would it be to see a fit NN palming it down to Mitchell in space! That may happen this year, granted, but I think it will be next year when we see him at his explosive best.
Shep, Mitchell and NN all in the same teamIt would be very disappointing if we never get to see Naitanui and Mitchell on field at the same time.
Would be an epic case of blue balls knowing what could have been
Best 22 for round 1.
Shep Gov Barras
Hurn Schoey Wellingham
Gaff Priddis Sheed
Darling Petrie Cripps
Hill JK Lecra
Ruck: Vardy, Shuey, Mitchell
Bench: Jetta, Yeo, Hutchings,Butler
Emergencies Nelson Masten Emac
Noticeable Absent . Nic Nat , Slyce
Masten put up a fair case to be included in the 22 in jlt 2 In which case Hutchings will be emergency. Nelson almost ready to squeeze out Butler.
Players also close for consideration.
Redden and Cole to push up for a spot playing WAFL . Also Duggan Giles and Slyce get some fitness in WAFL.
FB: Sheppard Barrass Wellingham
HB: Yeo McGovern Hurn
M: Jetta Priddis Gaff
HF: LeCras Darling Hill
FF:Cripps Kennedy Petrie
R: Vardy Mitchell Shuey
B: Redden Sheed Masten Butler
E: Hutchings Schofield Nelson
I'm in the 2 talls in defence and 6 talls overall camp. That will probably mean that Yeo or Sheppard have to play on a tall again but I still like those match ups.
I'm also in favour of swinging McGovern forward throughout the game but that might only be possible if we play one of MacKenzie or Schofield as well.
Otherwise it's a pretty standard team. Petrie is only in there for balance and it's hard to leave out better footballers for him but you can't ruck Vardy all day.
Likewise, I wonder why we haven't tried Schofield in the ruck. It would allow us to play 2.5 tall defenders, which balances more nicely, and, if we're playing ruckmen who don't win taps but compete around the ground (Petrie), I don't see why Will couldn't pull that off.
I, errr...I think you made your point.FB: Sheppard Barrass Wellingham
HB: Yeo McGovern Hurn
M: Jetta Priddis Gaff
HF: LeCras Darling Hill
FF:Cripps Kennedy Petrie
R: Vardy Mitchell Shuey
B: Redden Sheed Masten Butler
E: Hutchings Schofield Nelson
I'm in the 2 talls in defence and 6 talls overall camp. That will probably mean that Yeo or Sheppard have to play on a tall again but I still like those match ups.
I'm also in favour of swinging McGovern forward throughout the game but that might only be possible if we play one of MacKenzie or Schofield as well.
Otherwise it's a pretty standard team. Petrie is only in there for balance and it's hard to leave out better footballers for him but you can't ruck Vardy all day.
Likewise, I wonder why we haven't tried Schofield in the ruck. It would allow us to play 2.5 tall defenders, which balances more nicely, and, if we're playing ruckmen who don't win taps but compete around the ground (Petrie), I don't see why Will couldn't pull that off.
I, errr...I think you made your point.
Chrome crashed for one of you, didn't it?
Ah, I had issues and double posted but I have no idea why Dan had the same post.
Maybe he was trying to quote it and it died for him.
Explain yourself, Dan.
Once you posted it twice I thought it would become a cool trend. That's now ruined. Thanks a lot.
It would be interesting to see what difference Sandilands would have made at the centre bounces.
There's hitouts and there's hitouts. Sandi is pretty good with hitouts 2 advantage nowadaysFreo actually won the hitouts so I am not sure that it would of made that big of a difference.