Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
So Vardy and McInnes then?
If Eric lines up rnd 1 and make no mistake he will cost us the game v Norf with a number if his clangers.
Beggars belief that we seem to be going down this path again. Speechless.
Let's get around Mackenzie if he is selected, send him all of our positive energy and support.I think i'd still prefer Schofield over Mackenzie.
Personally i think he's still a liability. Just not playing with confidence and his disposal certainly isn't convincing.
* off.Let's get around Mackenzie if he is selected, send him all of our positive energy and support.
* offLet's get around Mackenzie if he is selected, send him all of our positive energy and support.
If Eric lines up rnd 1 and make no mistake he will cost us the game v Norf with a number if his clangers.
Beggars belief that we seem to be going down this path again. Speechless.
**** off.
**** off
s**t campaigners**** off
* offs**t campaigners
Not following?
That's ridiculous. If he's not good enough to make the team now who gives a * if he leaves.Emac would leave at the end of this year if he end up playing WAFL. Think they want to keep him beyond this year (we would not get much in return anyway) and thats probably why he might be getting a game ahead of Barass. Same reason why we played Cox, Naitanui and Lycett in the same team in 2014 when Lycett of out of contract at the end of that year.
Doesn't seem that way does it.Surely Barrass will be selected ahead of Mackenzie if it's 1 or the other????
He's younger, almost as good 1 on 1 defending, better intercept mark and much better disposer of the ball and decision maker
No brainier I would've thought
It is a no brainer but we've made plenty of really f****** stupid team selections over the last few years so picking McKenzie over Barrass wouldn't really be a massive surpriseSurely Barrass will be selected ahead of Mackenzie if it's 1 or the other????
He's younger, almost as good 1 on 1 defending, better intercept mark and much better disposer of the ball and decision maker
No brainier I would've thought
I would be surprised if Venables plays AFL this year. Think the Club is taking it slowly as not much point in getting re-injured. Also seeing as he hasn't had much of a pre-season, would his fitness levels be up to speed for AFL?You're projecting a lot of major injuries there - Hurn, Emac, Masten, Butler, Hill.
Still it would be awesome if one of Venables or Rioli forced their way in by then.
That's ridiculous. If he's not good enough to make the team now who gives a **** if he leaves.
Yeah he's not worth much but so what he'll get his chance(s) throughout the season when injuries inevitably occur and then if he still doesn't perform he is no loss anyway
Simpson has nominated Venables along with Rioli as draftees that could play this yearI would be surprised if Venables plays AFL this year. Think the Club is taking it slowly as not much point in getting re-injured. Also seeing as he hasn't had much of a pre-season, would his fitness levels be up to speed for AFL?
I would have no problems in lining up with Yeo on Waite so happy to stay with Gov and one of eMac or Barrass.Think it's more likely that they might play both Mckenzie and Barrass than one or the other
A forward line of Waite, Brown and a resting ruckman (Daw or Goldstein) may tempt the match committee to go with three talls with an underdone Schofield being left out