Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2017 Draft Prospects

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Fogarty I was told we were keen on was Darcy. Are there two of them? That's super confusing. Maybe he got his wires crossed, but def said D. Fogarty.
 
Can someone talk to me about Fogarty? I’ve just been told we’re scouting him pretty hard.

From what I’ve been told, he has a Patty Cripps ceiling? Bit slow though. Is that a fair summation?
So the list grows. So far it looks like we're keen on Coffield, Constable, Murphy, Fogarty, Brander, Allen and even Naughton.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Thanks for the discussion over the past 24 hours, gents. I now feel that there is real quality available at 9 & 16 (as there should be). I wouldn't rule out going for a tall at either pick (but not both) with Brander and Balta looking very impressive as I think we are short a good, tall, mobile KPF still. There could be a Stringer replacement available in Bonar or Fogarty. There are some excellent pick 9 mids/versatiles possibilities in Coffield, Stephenson, Cerra, Murphy (gotta say, looks like a bolter) or even Brayshaw, mids like Clark, O'Brien and Richards could be available at 16. There are promising forwards like Higgins and Houlahan too.

Let's put away the negativity, it is a smorgasbord when you have two high picks like we do.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the discussion over the past 24 hours, gents. I now feel that there is real quality available at 9 & 16 (as there should be). I wouldn't rule out going for a tall at either pick (but not both) with Brander and Balta looking very impressive as I think we are short a good, tall, mobile KPF still. There could be a Stringer replacement available in Bonar or Fogarty. There are some excellent pick 9 mids/versatiles possibilities in Coffield, Stephenson, Cerra, Murphy (gotta say, looks like a bolter) or even Brayshaw, mids like Clark, O'Brien and Richards could be available at 16. There are promising forwards like Higgins and Houlahan too.

Let's put away the negativity, it is a smorgasbord when you have two high picks like we do.
Well said and I agree totally, I wouldn't be surprised if Dal pulls a smokey at 16 and picks someone from left field...
 
The Fogarty I was told we were keen on was Darcy. Are there two of them? That's super confusing. Maybe he got his wires crossed, but def said D. Fogarty.
Now watch us take BOTH Fogartys, just to see the heads of all the commentators explode. Will Zac Bailey last to 82? Because we do need to add to our Baileys...
 
Well said and I agree totally, I wouldn't be surprised if Dal pulls a smokey at 16 and picks someone from left field...

Lochie O'Brien at 16 would do it for me. Murphy at 9 - let's do the Bont with him.
 
Now watch us take BOTH Fogartys, just to see the heads of all the commentators explode. Will Zac Bailey last to 82? Because we do need to add to our Baileys...
I want to get Zac Bailey and someone called Morris something so we can have Zac Bailey Dale Morris something
 
Lochie O'Brien at 16 would do it for me. Murphy at 9 - let's do the Bont with him.

Murphy is growing on me and hopefully still there at 16.

Can Gollo or Wizard tell us if he has potential to become a mid as I see a lot of David Mundy in him.
 
When you consider the pure leg speed in our team you think of
Johannisen, Dahlhaus and Jong funny enough all rookie picks
so maybe that is a big clue to this years likely selections with
picks 9 & 16, maybe. You could have picks 25, 35, 45, 55, 65
and even 75 in this draft and there is no way you could say
which number would produce the best player i think the mock
draft shows that.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

So which is the good Fogarty and which is the bad? Based on this boards opinion?
 
So which is the good Fogarty and which is the bad? Based on this boards opinion?
They are both good, Darcy Fogarty is seen as having more potential whereas Lachie Fogarty had a very good year . Darcy top 5 on potential, Lackie is more of a late first-mid second round pick.

On a side note, Gary Ablett filled in for my basketball team tonight. I haven't been able to play a lot lately due to uni commitments though so I missed out. This isn't a joke though, he scored 18 points but none were from three pointers so I have Ablett covered in a statistical category. I still have hope for my sporting career.
 
Up until now I've been avoiding the coffield highlights... Looks clearly above most others discussed in our range (constable, fogarties, murphy, clark, bailey, etc) and a steal at 9 if he slides. Can't see why saints would pass on him if he makes it that far.

RE Allen. Don't see how he fits now we have schache. Given we'll probably also have a resting ruck forward. Much prefer speed and skills with our picks to complement our young spine.
 
Thanks for the discussion over the past 24 hours, gents. I now feel that there is real quality available at 9 & 16 (as there should be). I wouldn't rule out going for a tall at either pick (but not both) with Brander and Balta looking very impressive as I think we are short a good, tall, mobile KPF still. There could be a Stringer replacement available in Bonar or Fogarty. There are some excellent pick 9 mids/versatiles possibilities in Coffield, Stephenson, Cerra, Murphy (gotta say, looks like a bolter) or even Brayshaw, mids like Clark, O'Brien and Richards could be available at 16. There are promising forwards like Higgins and Houlahan too.

Let's put away the negativity, it is a smorgasbord when you have two high picks like we do.
I'll second that. This is one of the better threads imo thanks to the handful of regular posters who obviously put in the time, know their footy, happy to share their knowledge and opinions, and leave the ego and personal stuff alone. Much appreciated.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Just checked out Joel Garner... wouldnt be disappointed if he ends up being our p.16 either.. looks to be one of those types who plays better at higher levels of standard.. and a neat left foot...

On SM-G950F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
When you consider the pure leg speed in our team you think of
Johannisen, Dahlhaus and Jong funny enough all rookie picks
so maybe that is a big clue to this years likely selections with
picks 9 & 16, maybe. You could have picks 25, 35, 45, 55, 65
and even 75 in this draft and there is no way you could say
which number would produce the best player i think the mock
draft shows that.
So what you are saying is our top two picks are a toss up between
Charlie Constable, Hunter Clark and Nathan Murphy and that after
the mid twenties the draft is very even. Maybe even mid teens.
 
Thanks for the discussion over the past 24 hours, gents. I now feel that there is real quality available at 9 & 16 (as there should be). I wouldn't rule out going for a tall at either pick (but not both) with Brander and Balta looking very impressive as I think we are short a good, tall, mobile KPF still. There could be a Stringer replacement available in Bonar or Fogarty. There are some excellent pick 9 mids/versatiles possibilities in Coffield, Stephenson, Cerra, Murphy (gotta say, looks like a bolter) or even Brayshaw, mids like Clark, O'Brien and Richards could be available at 16. There are promising forwards like Higgins and Houlahan too.

Let's put away the negativity, it is a smorgasbord when you have two high picks like we do.
Agree, they say it's not the best draft, but seems to me there is plenty of good talent available. Perhaps it's more even than usual, seems to me you could throw a blanket over about 12 players. We should get a couple, of good ones here, I'm trying not to get too biased in my hopes and focus on one or 2. That said of the ones most likely to be around at our pick I do like Coffield and Constable. Murphy is similar to them also. Zac Bailey is the one who stands out for breakaway speed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom