Remove this Banner Ad

2017 Draft rumours

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Didn't realize Zorko had played for Collingwood
Mate if you think Zorko is better than Beams then more power to you, but on the same note, what position did Zorko start his career playing?
 
Who cares what he will be in his first season. Stop extrapolating.

Also LDU, Dow and Brayshaw have been talked about at #1 in recent days. Many have talked about how amazing it is there is no stand out number 1.

You're obviously a guru though so anybody who has a their own concerns or preferences is automatically wrong.

Love the fact you bake me for my concerns about Rayner and follow it up by attributing comments to me that I never made as if he is the one I really want after all. Having an each way bet.

It's okay though. Your special brand of angry saw you go too hard, too early and now you have no choice but to save face by continuing along the same path. Could be entertaining.
you're the one that cares about what he will be in his first season, his lack of tank is about the least concerning aspect of a footballer in the first season. Tank is the easiest aspect of AFL to increase, the only reason it gets talked about ad nauseum is because he's the top prospect and the media need to fill 2 months of air time on the draft.

Others being talked about as pick 1 is completely irrelevant to who is rated the footballer, McCluggage was similarly the best rated and he went third. Those other players are talked about because, once again there is literally nothing else to talk about and 'Brisbane need to consider the homesickness factor'. I'm definitely not disagreeing that they do need to consider the 'go home factor'

It's not you it's the Carlton supporters in general, the number who are either overtly hoping Rayner tanks or masking their hope with a thin veil. You could probably forgive me for interpreting 'Wouldn't it suck if the best player tanked and ended up at my club' as one of those thinly veiled comments.

To be honest, it would suck if he intentionally tanked because it would be a continuation of the escalation of 'homesickness' is absolutely creating imbalance an already fairly unbalanced 'national' competition. But the imbalance is an unsolvable overarching issue of the AFL's fairly unique situation being a traditional competition in a relatively small capitalist society spread over an enormous country.

I hope I'm entertaining enough for our conversation to continue. As for your 'You can't tell me how I think and feel, but you're clearly mad lol' hypocrisy, I'd rather that didn't continue. ;)
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

It's not you it's the Carlton supporters in general, the number who are either overtly hoping Rayner tanks or masking their hope with a thin veil. You could probably forgive me for interpreting 'Wouldn't it suck if the best player tanked and ended up at my club' as one of those thinly veiled comments.

I've seen about two comments max from Carlton supporters.

'Masking their hope with a thin veil' - ****ing lol - what a lot of pedantry.

Have a look at the Carlton board if you want to get a real gauge on who Carlton supporters want at 3. At this stage, most are leaning towards Paddy Dow, then LDU, and then Rayner.

Our biggest area of need is midfielders - and by some distance - which is why Rayner isn't as highly regarded (at least in the context of what we need) as others. It's mostly opposition supporters who are linking Rayner with Carlton due to us being a Victorian club with the highest draft selection and Rayner being commonly viewed as the most talented player in the draft.

I personally don't think his ceiling is that much higher than Dow's, LDU's or Cerra's, who all have elite traits to be developed.
 
Bombers added Smith/Saad/Stringer. To go with Merrett/Daniher/Hurley/Parish/
Tippa etc

I know where I’d want to be.
Wouldn't that be even more reason to move clubs, as there is likely to be even less opportunities for him at senior level with the new trio joining the Bombers...?
 
Wouldn't that be even more reason to move clubs, as there is likely to be even less opportunities for him at senior level with the new trio joining the Bombers...?
Possibly.

Figjams normally back themselves in though.
 
You would imagine so.

I doubt they would appreciate the kid flapping his gums about that in the paper though.

The league should issue a very firm warning - I would suggest publicly announce that should a similar situation arise in the future that the player in question would be ruled out of the draft that year and the club in question would forfeit the pick under question.

Pretty big penalty but kids ‘nominating’ their ‘club of choice’ before the draft is ridiculous - next it’ll be refusing to sign their rookie contracts and demanding a trade before they step on the field.
I agree on the penalty on a player but a bit harsh blaming a club for a youngster shooting his mouth off.

If they brought that in then I'll be nominating for next year's draft and talking up West Coast using their first pick on me (how ever late it will be).
 
Probably from the same sources that told you Jed Anderson was worth a first round pick.... oh wait...

easy fodder

Mate saints are a decade into a rebuild and still finishing 11th even after all these top picks.

Roos are one year in and wouldn't surprise me If we are better than you next year.

Oh and btw we still got our first rounder and change during that Anderson trade period.

Effectively Anderson for Bastianc.

Not great but no big loss

Cheers
 
you're the one that cares about what he will be in his first season, his lack of tank is about the least concerning aspect of a footballer in the first season. Tank is the easiest aspect of AFL to increase, the only reason it gets talked about ad nauseum is because he's the top prospect and the media need to fill 2 months of air time on the draft.

Others being talked about as pick 1 is completely irrelevant to who is rated the footballer, McCluggage was similarly the best rated and he went third. Those other players are talked about because, once again there is literally nothing else to talk about and 'Brisbane need to consider the homesickness factor'. I'm definitely not disagreeing that they do need to consider the 'go home factor'

It's not you it's the Carlton supporters in general, the number who are either overtly hoping Rayner tanks or masking their hope with a thin veil. You could probably forgive me for interpreting 'Wouldn't it suck if the best player tanked and ended up at my club' as one of those thinly veiled comments.

To be honest, it would suck if he intentionally tanked because it would be a continuation of the escalation of 'homesickness' is absolutely creating imbalance an already fairly unbalanced 'national' competition. But the imbalance is an unsolvable overarching issue of the AFL's fairly unique situation being a traditional competition in a relatively small capitalist society spread over an enormous country.

I hope I'm entertaining enough for our conversation to continue. As for your 'You can't tell me how I think and feel, but you're clearly mad lol' hypocrisy, I'd rather that didn't continue. ;)

My only issue with Rayner has been the lack of endurance that some rated phantom drafts have talked about. I know the tank can be improved but I don't know much about his dedication to improve it.

Carlton have obviously been burnt by the likes of Troy Menzel and Kristian Jaksch as far as working to overcome this issue so it's a concern for some of us.

However I recognise he has the best upside and x factor of the top picks. I would take him over all but LDU for the excitement level alone.

I guess the idea of a pure mid and the chance of Fogarty at #10 appeals. Failing that Rayner and Clark/Constable. Rayner and Fogarty is The ultimate risk vs reward scenario and does not guarantee our midfield issues get addressed long term.

In a funny way, I hope we don't have to make a choice to pass up Rayner for anyone else. I'm worried we could go the wrong way and the choice being out of our hands would be easier to deal with.
 
you're the one that cares about what he will be in his first season, his lack of tank is about the least concerning aspect of a footballer in the first season. Tank is the easiest aspect of AFL to increase, the only reason it gets talked about ad nauseum is because he's the top prospect and the media need to fill 2 months of air time on the draft.

Others being talked about as pick 1 is completely irrelevant to who is rated the footballer, McCluggage was similarly the best rated and he went third. Those other players are talked about because, once again there is literally nothing else to talk about and 'Brisbane need to consider the homesickness factor'. I'm definitely not disagreeing that they do need to consider the 'go home factor'

It's not you it's the Carlton supporters in general, the number who are either overtly hoping Rayner tanks or masking their hope with a thin veil. You could probably forgive me for interpreting 'Wouldn't it suck if the best player tanked and ended up at my club' as one of those thinly veiled comments.

To be honest, it would suck if he intentionally tanked because it would be a continuation of the escalation of 'homesickness' is absolutely creating imbalance an already fairly unbalanced 'national' competition. But the imbalance is an unsolvable overarching issue of the AFL's fairly unique situation being a traditional competition in a relatively small capitalist society spread over an enormous country.

I hope I'm entertaining enough for our conversation to continue. As for your 'You can't tell me how I think and feel, but you're clearly mad lol' hypocrisy, I'd rather that didn't continue. ;)

It really does stink that if Raynar is showing signs he would be a flight risk that means the Brisbane Lions, a team who really needs pick 1 are essentially unable to go after the best player in the draft. Does not seem entirely fair.
 
easy fodder

Mate saints are a decade into a rebuild and still finishing 11th even after all these top picks.

Roos are one year in and wouldn't surprise me If we are better than you next year.

Oh and btw we still got our first rounder and change during that Anderson trade period.

Effectively Anderson for Bastianc.

Not great but no big loss

Cheers
You’re a bit uneducated aren’t you?

We’ve been rebuilding since 2014. Steady progress every year, taking in draw difficulty this year.

I’d take Billings over everyone on Norths list. Deadset.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I've seen about two comments max from Carlton supporters.

'Masking their hope with a thin veil' - ******* lol - what a lot of pedantry.

Have a look at the Carlton board if you want to get a real gauge on who Carlton supporters want at 3. At this stage, most are leaning towards Paddy Dow, then LDU, and then Rayner.

Our biggest area of need is midfielders - and by some distance - which is why Rayner isn't as highly regarded (at least in the context of what we need) as others. It's mostly opposition supporters who are linking Rayner with Carlton due to us being a Victorian club with the highest draft selection and Rayner being commonly viewed as the most talented player in the draft.

I personally don't think his ceiling is that much higher than Dow's, LDU's or Cerra's, who all have elite traits to be developed.
two? haven't been looking very attentively then.
Rayner isn't highly regarded by a fan base on a forum? someone better call SOS to let him know how upset you'll all be if you pick him!

If Carlton had pick one they'd pick Rayner under the guise that in 3-4 years have the best midfielder from the draft pool, conveniently when they are playing finals again. SOS isn't as short sighted as a bigfooty club draft thread with it's perpetuated group think. There wouldn't be a single recruiter in the competition that wouldn't take Rayner at 1 on talent, potential and likelihood to reach said potential alone, unfortunately other aspects do exist and so there is a real, but small, chance Brisbane pass on him.

Belittling the way I express my views on an internet forum? I hope you get satisfaction through other aspect of life as well.
 
Last edited:
You’re a bit uneducated aren’t you?

We’ve been rebuilding since 2014. Steady progress every year, taking in draw difficulty this year.

I’d take Billings over everyone on Norths list. Deadset.

Billings..... The top 5 pick who plays half forward flank. Ahhh yep

9th in 2016 to 11th 2017 with less wins

Steady improvement
 
Billings..... The top 5 pick who plays half forward flank. Ahhh yep

9th in 2016 to 11th 2017 with less wins

Steady improvement
And who have you got? Ryan Clarke? Spare me.

Ummmm that’s why I said draw difficulty. You really are stupid :)
 
You’re a bit uneducated aren’t you?

We’ve been rebuilding since 2014. Steady progress every year, taking in draw difficulty this year.

I’d take Billings over everyone on Norths list. Deadset.

I wouldn't. jack steven is your best player by a mile. after him id take jy simpkin.
 
I wouldn't. jack steven is your best player by a mile. after him id take jy simpkin.
How was prep today?

I’ll give you Stuv but get back to me when Simpkin gets 30 & 5 in one match. I rate Jy highly fwiw.
 
My only issue with Rayner has been the lack of endurance that some rated phantom drafts have talked about. I know the tank can be improved but I don't know much about his dedication to improve it.

Carlton have obviously been burnt by the likes of Troy Menzel and Kristian Jaksch as far as working to overcome this issue so it's a concern for some of us.

However I recognise he has the best upside and x factor of the top picks. I would take him over all but LDU for the excitement level alone.

I guess the idea of a pure mid and the chance of Fogarty at #10 appeals. Failing that Rayner and Clark/Constable. Rayner and Fogarty is The ultimate risk vs reward scenario and does not guarantee our midfield issues get addressed long term.

In a funny way, I hope we don't have to make a choice to pass up Rayner for anyone else. I'm worried we could go the wrong way and the choice being out of our hands would be easier to deal with.
You would take a Rayner because he's exciting but you'd prefer LDU? It's pretty short sighted to view him as only an exciting player, the kid averaged a couple possessions less than LDU at champs level even with his 'poor tank'. He genuinely has the scope to be a top player in the AFL and the biggest thing holding him back is just about the easiest aspect of football to improve. The reason people think his tank is a genuine issue is because it's one of only thing that has been talked about for past 2 months. It really is a non issue as many of the people who have actually dealt with him have said on numerous occasions.

When people talk about the draft for 2+ months they get in feedback loops and vastly complex human beings are generalised to nth degree and they become 'x-factor with no tank' 'explosive but needs years to add mass' 'immediate impact but lower ceiling' 'best kick but injury prone' 'x-factor but can't kick'. Everyone loses all perspective.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Dra


Draw difficulty haha hell. Not sure that excuse plays too well. But go with it if you like.

Oh personal Insults... You win. That's below my level
LOL and what was your excuse after going 10-0 in 2016?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top