The Old Dark Navy's
Moderator
- Moderator
- #576
You would take a Rayner because he's exciting but you'd prefer LDU? It's pretty short sighted to view him as only an exciting player, the kid averaged a couple possessions less than LDU at champs level even with his 'poor tank'. He genuinely has the scope to be a top player in the AFL and the biggest thing holding him back is just about the easiest aspect of football to improve. The reason people think his tank is a genuine issue is because it's one of only thing that has been talked about for past 2 months. It really is a non issue as many of the people who have actually dealt with him have said on numerous occasions.
When people talk about the draft for 2+ months they get in feedback loops and vastly complex human beings are generalised to nth degree and they become 'x-factor with no tank' 'explosive but needs years to add mass' 'immediate impact but lower ceiling' 'best kick but injury prone' 'x-factor but can't kick'. Everyone loses all perspective.
I didn't say I viewed him as only being exciting. I'm clearly preferring LDU because he is a pure midfielder. I would be fine with Rayner being a part time midfielder initially because of the x factor up forward we also need.
Preferring someone else is not an insult to Rayner. It's not like I've said anything nobody else has said.




