- Dec 1, 2013
- 9,590
- 7,835
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Yeah we pretty much know it is out of those 2Can confirm 100% you're taking Brayshaw or Rayner at 1.
Focusing on mids with 15 and 18 too..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah we pretty much know it is out of those 2Can confirm 100% you're taking Brayshaw or Rayner at 1.
Focusing on mids with 15 and 18 too..
Dow is the other one who impresses and competes and uses his speed. I don't get why there's a go home issue when he's from Swan Hill.
He doesn't have the agility of the top mids. Doesn't have the projected ceiling of the "known" quantities, and doesn't have the perceived potential of some of the bolters. He's much more developed and ready to go, so had an advantage over many of the undeveloped bodies running around the TAC cup and U18 Champs.Yeah, I think you had him at 18 (from memory) in your top 20. I think he would be a good selection at 18, a competitive beast who is a potential upgrade on Matho, especially if we take Brayshaw at one. He has grunt and admittedly Berry has that, but we could have two of them. I really don't understand why he has slipped so much... the standout midfielder in an elite group in that game.
Dow is the other one who impresses and competes and uses his speed. I don't get why there's a go home issue when he's from Swan Hill.
Ed Richards is very impressive and would be a good choice at 15 or 18, especially if long term we have plans to send Witho into the midfield. He has the pace off half back we could use and will be a very good AFL player imo. Ling seems much too set on Geelong from his video, hope we don’t take him.If still available, would be happy to put money on one of Richards or Ling being a Lion next year.
I reckon he has go home written all over him. Dogs are keen on him apparently, but after gazing into the crystal ball I think GWS will take the risk at 11.Ed Richards is very impressive and would be a good choice at 15 or 18, especially if long term we have plans to send Witho into the midfield. He has the pace off half back we could use and will be a very good AFL player imo. Ling seems much too set on Geelong from his video, hope we don’t take him.
If still available, would be happy to put money on one of Richards or Ling being a Lion next year.
You could be right, just looking at the range of players who could be around at 15 and 18. If GWS take him then someone else will slide, which is great for us.I reckon he has go home written all over him. Dogs are keen on him apparently, but after gazing into the crystal ball I think GWS will take the risk at 11.
Ed Richards is very impressive and would be a good choice at 15 or 18, especially if long term we have plans to send Witho into the midfield. He has the pace off half back we could use and will be a very good AFL player imo. Ling seems much too set on Geelong from his video, hope we don’t take him.
Is he not Collingwood Royalty.I reckon he has go home written all over him. Dogs are keen on him apparently, but after gazing into the crystal ball I think GWS will take the risk at 11.
With talk that we are once again looking to draft players with pre-existing relationships. (Rayner told us he wants to play with Fogarty) I hope that Conole and the club are aware that Brayshaw and Constable are best mates. 15 might be a stretch, but 18 seems like a good pick for Constable.
That would be awesome, I have seen a bit of talk on the DT&FA board that he could slide but not quite that far as you say.Not that I can see it happening but imagine if Stephenson slid to our pick 15 due to his heart condition? Now that I’ve put some hopium out there imagine if he was taken at pick 12, melts everywhere.
That would be awesome, I have seen a bit of talk on the DT&FA board that he could slide but not quite that far as you say.
Dream Scenario- Rayner, Stephenson, Bonar. Talk about serious X factor and upside or we could go the seemingly safer option in- Brayshaw, Fogarty, Bailey.
They are poles apart but I would be happy with either trio. Which trio would you take if you could sign on now?
Brayshaw, Higgins, Bonar/Fogarty?That would be awesome, I have seen a bit of talk on the DT&FA board that he could slide but not quite that far as you say.
Dream Scenario- Rayner, Stephenson, Bonar. Talk about serious X factor and upside or we could go the seemingly safer option in- Brayshaw, Fogarty, Bailey.
They are poles apart but I would be happy with either trio. Which trio would you take if you could sign on now?
Rayner told us who he wants selected with our picks? Really?With talk that we are once again looking to draft players with pre-existing relationships. (Rayner told us he wants to play with Fogarty) I hope that Conole and the club are aware that Brayshaw and Constable are best mates. 15 might be a stretch, but 18 seems like a good pick for Constable.
Some people are getting their hopes up lol.
Imagine if we went:
Pick 1: Rayner
Pick 15: Brayshaw
Pick 18: Stephenson
All dropping as they state in the media and interviews they ONLY want to play for the Lions.
Nope, was mentioned by the Champion Data dude in their video on the Champion Data top 30 on the Hun website.Rayner told us who he wants selected with our picks? Really?
Was it on Twotter chirped by a twitter?
Also, he's short and slow. He's mini Rockliff, even according to Champion Data.Higgins is interesting. He's left school and has more or less made footy his full time job this year, which suggests he will have less physical development in him than others who had other responsibilities. I just don't see the upside in him at all TBH.
Nope, was mentioned by the Champion Data dude in their video on the Champion Data top 30 on the Hun website.