Position 2017 Forwards

[bananatigz]

Making a call, Higgins will average 95+, will be just about norths number one mid this year. Whether he can stay on the park is the big question.

 

[Significant]

Making a call, Higgins will average 95+, will be just about norths number one mid this year. Whether he can stay on the park is the big question.

Shhhhh

 

[blackshadow]

Making a call, Higgins will average 95+, will be just about norths number one mid this year. Whether he can stay on the park is the big question.

Agreed, still not in my team for now but is banging on the selection door.

 

[Sydney Kicker]

To the recent posters picking the 200k rookies. BEWARE. History says they do not perform appreciably better than 120k rookies. Only take expensive rookies if there is no other alternative. Especially in the forwards.

 

[Sydney Kicker]

View attachment 340315
Feels risky but i think it could go alright thoughts?

Sorry but I would try again. You have 2 midpricers neither of which is a fallen premo (hence highly unlikely to become keepers). And your rookies are overpriced. Take 120k rookies first unless you have no alternative.

If you want a midpricer try Wingard or Roughy. Both have history of a close to 100 point season average which Heeney and Miller can't say.

 

[Hairy Lager]

To the recent posters picking the 200k rookies. BEWARE. History says they do not perform appreciably better than 120k rookies. Only take expensive rookies if there is no other alternative. Especially in the forwards.

...or better know as the Hopper Clause.

 

[Feerits Elf]

To the recent posters picking the 200k rookies. BEWARE. History says they do not perform appreciably better than 120k rookies. Only take expensive rookies if there is no other alternative. Especially in the forwards.

This is precisely the reason I took Clem Smith over Patrick Cripps in 2015.

Saved myself a tidy $94k on the deal too #winning

 

[Super Hans]

To the recent posters picking the 200k rookies. BEWARE. History says they do not perform appreciably better than 120k rookies. Only take expensive rookies if there is no other alternative. Especially in the forwards.

I don't reckon it's that big of a deal taking a 200k mid. The way I see it they're just 90k closer to a premium when it's time for upgrades.

 

[Double the Fist]

I don't reckon it's that big of a deal taking a 200k mid. The way I see it they're just 90k closer to a premium when it's time for upgrades.

To the recent posters picking the 200k rookies. BEWARE. History says they do not perform appreciably better than 120k rookies. Only take expensive rookies if there is no other alternative. Especially in the forwards.

Judge every rookie on merrit. If a rookie is 200k and worth it, get em.

 

[Dark Sharks]

Higgins case is arguably better than Heeney's.

Also Petracca is making me doubt my entire existence right now.

 

[Werewolf]

Agreed, still not in my team for now but is banging on the selection door.

How do you think Hrovat will go? Is he worth selecting as a forward?

 

[The Bomb]

To think he is only 18 years old

 

[The Bomb]

 

[Super Hans]

Dank must've gotten to him nice and early

 

[Double the Fist]

Who are you talking about?
Srs I don't know the player in the Dons gear.

 

[The Bomb]

Who are you talking about?
Srs I don't know the player in the Dons gear.

Begley, 4 goals in his 1st game.

 

[stevebbb]

Who are you talking about?
Srs I don't know the player in the Dons gear.

this cheap forward rookie stud (hopefully)

 

[Double the Fist]

Begley, 4 goals in his 1st game.

this cheap forward rookie stud (hopefully)

View attachment 340505

Ok. Ta.

Didn't recognise her!

 

[blackshadow]

How do you think Hrovat will go? Is he worth selecting as a forward?

I think he'll do very well for North but at $300K his price is ugly as sin.

Have toyed with him in my team but he's not a starter at this stage.

Simpkins showing yesterday was very impressive - he's locked if he's named in round 1.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Begley looks like a young Dane Swan.





Without the tatts.

 

[Majunga]

this cheap forward rookie stud (hopefully)

View attachment 340505

4 goals for 79 SC think i'll pass on that.

But if he averages 4 goals a game you'd be a genius!

 

[Nathan Wilcox]

Sorry but I would try again. You have 2 midpricers neither of which is a fallen premo (hence highly unlikely to become keepers). And your rookies are overpriced. Take 120k rookies first unless you have no alternative.

If you want a midpricer try Wingard or Roughy. Both have history of a close to 100 point season average which Heeney and Miller can't say.

Look at my other post mate

 

[Majunga]

View attachment 340315
Feels risky but i think it could go alright thoughts?

Unlike the Mum & Dad who tell their untalented child, YES you're a great singer! and set them forever on the path of delusional greatness i'll do you a favour and serve it up to you cold and hard...

That forward line sucks donkey **** and swallows!

 

[stevebbb]

4 goals for 79 SC think i'll pass on that.

But if he averages 4 goals a game you'd be a genius!

you're going to pass on a lively small forward because of that?
10 touches and 4 goals for 80 SC points sounds about right, JJK kicked 5 goals in a match last year and only scored 88

if he has a great JLT3 and lines up in round 1, he's locked in

 

[Feerits Elf]

you're going to pass on a lively small forward because of that?

10 touches and 4 goals for 80 SC points sounds about right, JJK kicked 5 goals in a match last year and only scored 88

That's OK, I won't be picking JJK either