Fair enough. I was just proposing an idea of how we could come up with a first round pick to offer three to GWS. Maybe a club might take two of those players for one first. I don't want to lose any of those players which is why I named them. You have to give up something good to get something good. I like the look of Gallucci actually. I know that you would have preferred Berry, but he looks to be a tad slow and more inside. With the Crouches, Sloane and now Greenwood and Hampton I am a bit more optimistic on our inside players. I think Gallucci can add something to the outside with speed but also getting in and under when its his turn. If this years draft is as slim pickings as you say, why wouldn't a club want to add a slightly more known quantity in Gallucci than going to the draft with a pick in the range 14-18. I think he would have played a lot more AFL if he was at a bottom half of the table club.
If it cost you Gallucci + Doedee for a 1st and you could pick up Kelly with that and our 2 firsts and if we could also do Cameron plus Atkins for Gibbs then we would be better for it in this current little window that we are in. We lose a lot of talent in that, but look at the team then, there would be no room for all of Gallucci, Cameron, Atkins and Milera anyway. Our 22 would look something like:
Lever Talia Brown
Laird Hartigan Smith
Sloane Kelly Gibbs
Lynch Walker Knight
Betts JJ McGovern
Sauce B. Crouch M. Crouch
Greenwood Kelly and 2 of (Cameron, Atkins, Milera, Gallucci, Seedsman, Douglas, Mackay, Poholke)
If you keep Cheney, then potentially you would be willing to trade Doedee and 2 or 3 of those names in brackets without us losing a beat. Just a side note, I am not saying we would be playing Sloane and Gibbs as wings, but rotate all three through the centre and rotate Greenwood with the Crouches.