2017 - Non Yeo Discussion (Formerly Non Freo Discussion)

Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

freo_leo29

Premiership Player
Joined
Oct 20, 2010
Posts
4,212
Likes
4,679
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
East Fremantle
Did forget about Cox but having Nyhuis, Deluca, logue, Darcy (susp i know) would have surely meant we got one due to weight of numbers.

Then again Ryan Clarke from North had 27 and still didn't get it so who the fk knows
 

One_Wing

Club Legend
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Posts
1,083
Likes
2,526
AFL Club
Fremantle
Cox is eligible next year.

Hayward isn't.
Pretty sure he'll still be eligible next year.

Edit: Great minds and all that Tayl0r
Still he could get the fabled double nomination like Fantasia. Giving awards to people who are "due" never works out. Because then the rock just keeps getting kicked further down the line. Stuff like this is how Al Pacino wins an Oscar for Scent of a woman instead of RDJ for Chaplin or Denzel for Malcolm X.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Posts
4,991
Likes
9,455
AFL Club
Fremantle
Mundy is past his best, too inconsistent.
Walters i'll give you, and Bennell when he plays consistent footy.
Blakely not yet.
Steven Hill is not an A grader, goes missing too much, may have something to do with how Lyon handles him.
Sandi is 35 in December, A Pearce hasn't played for years.
Neale is a great player, but not A grade, a bit like Schuey.
I have big hope for Hamling, looks like our best outside pick up in years.
Mate, we had no players in the AA 40
Literally one of the worst evaluations I've read of our players ever. Is this your prediction of them next year??
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Posts
1,963
Likes
2,572
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Fremantle
Just compared Cox to Darling at the same age (and remember he jumped out of the blocks for WC). Cox is ahead of Darling in everything except the admittedly vital accuracy in front of goal. If he can sort that out over the off season we have a real player in the 2nd/3rd tall space (but without the pea heart/campaigner baggage).
 

mike91

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Mar 13, 2011
Posts
7,957
Likes
9,738
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Fremantle
Fail to see how that makes a difference.
Pav was coached by Ross, he probably thinks he forward structures are good. Pav was captain, if he thought the forward structure was no good then he would have spoken up previously, which leads to two things, either he thinks they're good or Ross didn't listen to Pav. We need an outsider.
 

Purpletown

All Australian
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Posts
925
Likes
1,539
Location
Restumping
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
SFFC Denver Broncos
With the finals upon us, here's a quick peek at the alternate 2017 ladders.

Flat track ladder (v non-finalists)

Port: 12-1 // 1438 pts for - 774 pts against // 185.79%

Geelong: 11-2 // 1412 - 1081 // 130.62%

Richmond: 11-3 // 1419 - 1067 // 132.99%

GWS: 8-1-2 // 1144 - 864 // 132.40%

Adelaide: 8-1-3 // 1306 - 975 // 133.95%

Sydney: 9-5 // 1431 - 965 // 148.29%

Essendon: 9-5 // 1349 - 1226 // 110.03%

West Coast: 8-5 // 1226 -1065 // 115.12%

Freo: 6-4 // 801 - 854 // 93.79%



Top 8 ladder (top 8 v top 8)

Adelaide: 7-3 // 1109 - 801 // 138.45% (6-1 at home, 1-2 away)*

Sydney: 5-3 // 662 - 686 // 96.50% (1-2, 4-1)

GWS: 6-1-4 // 937 - 948 // 98.84% (4-1-1, 2-3)

Geelong: 4-1-4 // 722 - 737 // 97.96% (4-1, 0-1-3)

Richmond: 4-4 // 573 - 617 // 92.87% (3-1, 1-3)

West Coast: 4-5 // 738 - 793 // 93.06% (3-2, 1-3)

Essendon: 3-5 // 786 - 778 // 101.03% (3-1, 0-4)

Port: 2-7 // 730 - 897 // 81.38% (0-4, 2-3)*

Freo: 2-10 // 806 - 1306 // 61.72% (1-4, 1-6)

* Showdown games included as home games for both teams.

Ironic we played more games v top 8 teams than any of the finalists. Then again our poor form went a long way towards making them top 8 teams.
Port and Egos playing for the "Flat Trackers Cup" next week then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom