I do have a bit of a bias with Gawn but think he's very hard to pass up on. The third man up being banned gives him potential to gain a few more HTA. He averaged about 75 for HTA last year so that could easily go up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
elaborateHold off on nankervis
agree he is hard to pass up on, but he only goes big against the weaker rucks (ignore NM/Mel RD3 game)I do have a bit of a bias with Gawn but think he's very hard to pass up on. The third man up being banned gives him potential to gain a few more HTA. He averaged about 75 for HTA last year so that could easily go up.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Well Maric has lost easily 5kg, and at this stage has nankervis covered in virtually all rucks drills at training. While I think nankervis will eventually be a very good ruck just be cautious picking him this yearelaborate
dont think any of us were seriously looking at picking him over Sandilands and Ryder, even Boyd.Well Maric has lost easily 5kg, and at this stage has nankervis covered in virtually all rucks drills at training. While I think nankervis will eventually be a very good ruck just be cautious picking him this year
I can barely afford Jacobs with my current (half-baked) set-up so paying more for these higher priced players isn't going to work, except maybe Martin.Why Jacobs?
Seems an odd choice
Stef
Grundy
Goldy
Gawn
Mummy
I can see Jacobs improving this year to. Apparently injured last pre season someuld have impacted his scores. Also no third man up is good for him.I can barely afford Jacobs with my current (half-baked) set-up so paying more for these higher priced players isn't going to work, except maybe Martin.
Am thinking Jacobs will improve this year.
probably the bigger, less mobile rucks who are average heightIs there a ruckmen who won't benefit from third man up?
The lighter rucks? Blicavs doesn't count.
Will the bullocks benefit? The jumpers? Will it be nullified by coaches putting more into negating a dominant ruck.
I hate SC2017 already!![]()
For this to work you need Cameron to score more than your F8.Martin Sandilands Cameron. (Strandica maybe at F8 depending on preseason)
Only reason people are getting Strnadica is he is a good captains Loophole, also has FWD/RCK DPP, allowing people to cover for Sandi through Ryder in their forwards.Are we assuming it's Sandi Strnadica top 2 for Freo? So might as well get them both?
I just really want Boyd in there, honestly. He's cheap and will probably average 80.
Oh, the head to head is per position? Aw jeez, that changes everything about my team. (Never played before)Only reason people are getting Strnadica is he is a good captains Loophole, also has FWD/RCK DPP, allowing people to cover for Sandi through Ryder in their forwards.
Also, an 80 average is quite bad. Especially in the ruck. You'd be wanting a bit more then that if you pick him. Coming up against ruck combos that will be at 105/110 Average each with Boyd getting a 50-60 (likely when averaging 80) will put a massive dent in your chances of a win. If you want an 80 average, i'd go Witts, cheaper and 80 average is very achieveable imo.
If the aim of intially picking Boyd as a f4, ruck backup that would eventually become f7, fwd/ruck bench player be more enticing. 80 ave would be fine for that role. If is means having that extra cash to upgrade another mid pricer to premo it makes sense.Only reason people are getting Strnadica is he is a good captains Loophole, also has FWD/RCK DPP, allowing people to cover for Sandi through Ryder in their forwards.
Also, an 80 average is quite bad. Especially in the ruck. You'd be wanting a bit more then that if you pick him. Coming up against ruck combos that will be at 105/110 Average each with Boyd getting a 50-60 (likely when averaging 80) will put a massive dent in your chances of a win. If you want an 80 average, i'd go Witts, cheaper and 80 average is very achieveable imo.
Head to head is not position, it is the you vs the team you are playing that week.Oh, the head to head is per position? Aw jeez, that changes everything about my team. (Never played before)
It's not, he just meant that all other things being equal you would be behind.Oh, the head to head is per position? Aw jeez, that changes everything about my team. (Never played before)
and using his body to be physically intimidating around the field.Witts front running at the Suns for Round 1, will be better with lack of a 3rd up. Worries are getting the possessions around the field.
first of all, no.Talk me out of starting with that potato Ryder, has burnt me in the past.. not keen nor Maxxy at his price. I want mummy but he does stupid things far too often and I can't afford to trade his ass when he wipes somebody out (and we all know he will at some stage)
Truuuuue.. honestly what are you expecting from Ryder this season ??first of all, no.
Ryder is god, has a great beard
Gawn has a nice beard
Mumford doesnt have a beard, therefore is shit
i think he will start a bit rusty, just as he gets used to the pace of the game again. Then he should go 100+ from there on in IMO. Thats if Lube doesnt play.Truuuuue.. honestly what are you expecting from Ryder this season ??