Position 2017 Rucks

[Adnan]

i think i have the most ballsy setup with Nanks and Preuss starting and Cameron as cover. Gotta risk it for the biscuit

 

[The_Steadier]

i think i have the most ballsy setup with Nanks and Preuss starting and Cameron as cover. Gotta risk it for the biscuit

Sounds like you're chasing a tiny teddy.

 

[Adnan]

Sounds like you're chasing a tiny teddy.

but Tiny Teddys are the best, remember when they used to pop up in your lunch box how excited you used to get, that excitement im trying to generate her

 

[stevebbb]

The vibe on the Sydney board is that he's slipped to 4th favourite - Tippett, Naismith, Cameron, Sinclair.

Fair enough, i'm sure he'll still be given a shot though

 

[Daniel McL]

Fair enough, i'm sure he'll still be given a shot though

Only one shot, and one opportunity, to seize everything he ever wanted, one Ruck contest, would he capture it, or just let it slip.

 

[Huttabito]

Only one shot, and one opportunity, to seize everything he ever wanted, one Ruck contest, would he capture it, or just let it slip.

Wasn't even given one

 

[freddy mercury]

i think i have the most ballsy setup with Nanks and Preuss starting and Cameron as cover. Gotta risk it for the biscuit

RIP SC 2017

 

[gutsroy]

i think i have the most ballsy setup with Nanks and Preuss starting and Cameron as cover. Gotta risk it for the biscuit

If it pays off, you're laughing.

 

[clogwearer]

What price is he?

407k

new role will help him,

he didnt have the tank to play full time ruck. playing 2nd KPF and 2nd ruck will help him.

reckon he can average 85-95 this year

So... with Trengove we're saving 18k (as opposed to Ryder), losing dpp. Both speculative. Who do you go with, Beardy?

 

[toxic]

If it pays off, you're laughing.

Best movie ever

 

[toxic]

And its Super Saturday

.starring

Sandilands

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

So... with Trengove we're saving 18k (as opposed to Ryder), losing dpp. Both speculative. Who do you go with, Beardy?

Gawnstein

[emoji13][emoji13]

 

[scaryness]

Only one shot, and one opportunity, to seize everything he ever wanted, one Ruck contest, would he capture it, or just let it slip.

Judging by his usual play, let it slip.

 

[Daniel McL]

Judging by his usual play, let it slip.

That's because his arms were heavy, knees weak, palms were sweaty.

 

[gutsroy]

Best movie ever

Came out just over 30 years ago now, too, bloody amazing how time flies.

 

[Marc Codiga]

Ok noone has talked about Dan Currie, currently Suns R1 who has scored 93 & 95 in the JLT so far at 330k has to be considered?

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

Ok noone has talked about Dan Currie, currently Suns R1 who has scored 93 & 95 in the JLT so far at 330k has to be considered?

There is a reason for that...

 

[Marc Codiga]

There is a reason for that...

Why?

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

Why?

He has always performed well in the preseason but doesn't get games in the actual stuff
Rocket loves Witts so he will get the first crack at the number 1 ruck spot
Currie is a bit of a crappy forward as well

 

[Glorin]

The Sandilands trap has been baited.

 

[toxic]

The Sandilands trap has been baited.
View attachment 342417

Witts at R3

trap averted

 

[Glorin]

Witts at R3

trap averted

I put up a team in the development thread earlier that coincidentely did have Witts at R3, however Sandi was at R1 and Longer at R2!


In real terms, Sandi will be R2 for me come R1. Hoping either Cameron or Preuss or English get a start or Witts will cover. Went safe in rucks last and it cost me 3 trades. Take a risk this year and worst case it will still cost me 3 trades.

 

[Red Syrah]

trying to get my head around the rucks - definitely wanting to go with Sandi for R2 so then need some cover....

thinking there are only 2 options that provide sufficient cover in the event of sandi going down:

Option 1: Witts at R3 (1st ruck so should play all games given his webbing holds up), no need for cover in Fwds
Option 2: Ryder (or Nankervis) as F3 and Cameron as R3 (or Strndica for loophole)

which makes it a question of will ryder / nank do enough to be a F3 keeper, or is Witts good enough to fill in for a couple of games if needed bc if serious injury then upgrade sandi.

 

[The Original Swooper]

2 guns and a DP rookie R3 seems to be a set and forget strategy with Ryder as F for cover. BUT ....with Roughy and Campbell n/a early, and his breakout finals (the PF as sole ruck when Rough went down), should Tom Boyd be considered as cover ? 130k cheaper than Ryder, with a good chance of making some $

 

[freddy mercury]

If we pick Sandilands, what is the best way to cover him?
Ryder was the original plan, but he was terrible last game, today will tell a further story.

Could we pick a 300k bench player? Too much isnt it? Prusse will play, but for how long?