what ever the secret formula is (we all no there isnt one) it must be wrong if Motlop is compensated the same as what buddy was,
The secret formula is clearly the same as deciding the distribution and value of Priority Picks. AFL's discretion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what ever the secret formula is (we all no there isnt one) it must be wrong if Motlop is compensated the same as what buddy was,
Which part was incorrect?
Your are using common sense and logic to argue with a crows supporter.We couldn't give a s**t how many other clubs were going for them. What an f'ing stupid point. When Eddy Betts left Carlton as a FA only the Crows and North were properly interested. Does that define him in any way shape or form?
As for Motlop. Don't forget that your club offered him 600k! Yet he still picks us. But let's face it, this is what's really keeping you up at night posting on the Port board, isn't it?
You're right about our drafting. Fortunately we don't get to the point where our top end players want to be traded out. Good luck next year by the way, hope you keep Sloane
SoldHe's elite in other stats that may be surprising, given the criticisms he gets:
* Second in the comp for % of entries inside f50 that result in the team retaining possession - so he's elite for hitting targets inside f50.
* Second in the comp for pressure acts and pressure points per game in the forward line (this includes both positive use of the ball when he's under pressure, and putting enough pressure on oppo players to stuff up their use of the ball). His detractors at Melbourne say he doesn't tackle much or effectively; they think "pressure acts" are worthless stats.
* In the top 5 in the comp for % of one-on-one contests won (some Melbourne supporters would say that's because he picks & chooses, and there's some truth in this; he tends to hold back from contests that he doesn't think he's gonna win).
* Very high up (not sure exactly where) for accuracy of set shots. Most Melbourne supporters, even those who hate his guts, would say he's the guy you'd want with the ball in his hands if you were less than a goal down in the last minute of the GF.
* When fit, he's usually in the top 5 or 6 at Melbourne for ground covered during a game. Or was before 2017 season.
He's also good at finding space, very fast over the first 20m for his size. But what Melbourne could never do is lower their eyes and hit him up when he was in space. For much of his time there, a 30m pass would miss him by 5m. Melbourne also never understood kicking into space, or kicking to your teammate's advantage in a contest. And he's great at developing a synergy with other forwards, especially ones like Garlett & Hogan (so, Wingard & Robbie Gray) who can see 3 moves ahead, and at bringing others into the game.
So the Adelaide-Tom-Lynch role, basically. If you want an aggressive tall like Charlie Dixon, he's not the guy. He's not good at contesting long bombs to the hot-spot, and he's not good at "crashing packs" (but you've got Dixon & Ryder to do that). If you believe that the ideal player is Jack Viney and that every player should play the game like Viney does, he'll frustrate the hell out of you, like he did many Melbourne supporters. A poll on Demonland had 70% wanting to keep him and 30% happy to see the last of him.
The secret formula is clearly the same as deciding the distribution and value of Priority Picks. AFL's discretion.
We can't trade our 2018 first out from memory as we meet requirements for a restriction on that. Something to do with trading too many first rounders a few years in a row. I don't recall the exact rule.
The secret formula is clearly the same as deciding the distribution and value of Priority Picks. AFL's discretion.
Free Agency CompoListed under "it's the vibe" along with the rules of the game.
Right. It's two over a four-year period and the new rules started in the 2015 draft so the first four-year ends with the 2018 draft. As you say we selected two last year so we're okay. I remember reading 1970's MAD's where they were making jokes about this rule(in the American NBA) so it's been around for a long time. And it can cause some angst, Michael Jordan was a traded away future draft pick.I think it’s based on how many first rounders you use in the draft in over given period. As we used 2 first rounders last year, we should still be fine to trade a future first rounder this year, not that I would want to given how bumper next year’s draft is supposed to be!
With no further progressOff on holidays for 5 days, expect this thread to be 800 pages when I get back
Have fun.
Its panic stations on cow corner.Crow Envy - accurate name at least
Off on holidays for 5 days, expect this thread to be 800 pages when I get back
Have fun.
But you're already interstate.Off on holidays for 5 days, expect this thread to be 800 pages when I get back
Have fun.
The secret formula is clearly the same as deciding the distribution and value of Priority Picks. AFL's discretion.
I'm envious of their picks, with more to come. They should be focused on that instead of coming over here all "lol all three of rockliff, watts and motlop are speculative."
I'm envious of their picks, with more to come. They should be focused on that instead of coming over here all "lol all three of rockliff, watts and motlop are speculative."
Well, then there's the picks they'll get for Sloane tooI'm not envious of their picks. The crows are all in for a flag now just as we are. One pick will likely go for Gibbs, and they're balls deep into Jeremy McGovern too, so you'd think they'd need to part with something good to a rebuilding West Coast if they want him.
If they get Gibbs ad McGovern, that makes them next level good in 2018, but would have to cost them all three of the first round picks they would have acquired for Lever and Cameron.I'm not envious of their picks. The crows are all in for a flag now just as we are. One pick will likely go for Gibbs, and they're balls deep into Jeremy McGovern too, so you'd think they'd need to part with something good to a rebuilding West Coast if they want him.
Yep. They are in their window. They either turn their picks into trades, which will be players older then Lever and Cameron, putting them into 'now or never' even more deeply. Or they go to the draft, in which case minus Lever, Cameron and Smith (for next year), they've significantly weakened their chances in a rapidly closing window. They have a greater reliance on 28+ players then Port, both in number and importance to their side. And regardless of whether they trade or go to the draft, that's only going to increase. Their spin about youth, is more ambassador talk.I'm not envious of their picks. The crows are all in for a flag now just as we are. One pick will likely go for Gibbs, and they're balls deep into Jeremy McGovern too, so you'd think they'd need to part with something good to a rebuilding West Coast if they want him.
Nah, Lever + Cameron + B. Smith > Gibbs + McGovern IMO. That's assuming their plethora of 28+ players don't start dropping off either.If they get Gibbs ad McGovern, that makes them next level good in 2018, but would have to cost them all three of the first round picks they would have acquired for Lever and Cameron.