- Joined
- Aug 25, 2004
- Posts
- 13,599
- Likes
- 36,816
- Location
- Sydney
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- I hate other teams!
It's impossible to say with any kind of certainty that one player will be better than another on stats though. He might ba as good, better or worse but stats from the exact same age won't show anything other than a rough guide. He looks very good but to me he's always going to be a diamond encrusted Andrew Gaff more than a Paddy Dangerfield. He's going to be at least a very good player you would imagine regardless. I think he hasn't earned the right to be held in the same conversation yet or earn the same pay as the stars but hopefully if we take him he will get there.
Not sure if it's been said, but Kelly is going better than Shiel & Treloar were 2 years ago when everyone on here was wanting to sell the farm for them & pay them a mint. Well, Josh Kelly is better now than both those players were at the time so it should give an idea of how good he is & what he's worth long term.
Pay him a mint. Don't give a shit what we pay him, we have $2.9mil to spend
Edit: I agree with SS, Kelly is like an injury free Daniel Wells with better endurance & gut running capabilities. I'd pay a mint for that
Last edited:


