Remove this Banner Ad

2017 Trade & FA Targets Part 4

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Premium said:
It would be good to get him, but the Lions or Suns will get them. and really it is unfair for the top guys in the draft that they must go (interstate clubs)to clubs that no one wants to go to
Click to expand...
As it stands but if we do a big deal with gc. Could be 7 8 and armo for 2 and hall Martin ECT and if Brisbane take dow with two would let us take LDU or rayner
 
RWB4life said:
As it stands but if we do a big deal with gc. Could be 7 8 and armo for 2 and hall Martin ECT and if Brisbane take dow with two would let us take LDU or rayner
Click to expand...
GC will not be interested in Armo, how many games did he play this year ?
imo they will be after some one like Newnes Webster , not a bloke who has reported he has a back of a 75 year old
 
Mowman said:
GC will not be interested in Armo, how many games did he play this year ?
imo they will be after some one like Newnes Webster , not a bloke who has reported he has a back of a 75 year old
Click to expand...
Yes agree. Some serious wishful thinking.

I reckon the best they would do is 7&8 for 2 if we're lucky.

Mind you they do need some solid players with the right mindset.

Can't see them releasing any real quality players.

Worse case I'd give 8 for Hall with a pick back out way.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

VDS66 said:
Yes agree. Some serious wishful thinking.

I reckon the best they would do is 7&8 for 2 if we're lucky.

Mind you they do need some solid players with the right mindset.

Can't see them releasing any real quality players.

Worse case I'd give 8 for Hall with a pick back out way.
Click to expand...
Would rather take 8 to draft then take Hall with pick 8 .
Really don't care if it takes a year or 2 longer lets just do it right and stay the course
 
VDS66 said:
Yes agree. Some serious wishful thinking.

I reckon the best they would do is 7&8 for 2 if we're lucky.

Mind you they do need some solid players with the right mindset.

Can't see them releasing any real quality players.

Worse case I'd give 8 for Hall with a pick back out way.
Click to expand...
2 for 7 and 8 wouldn't be enough, especially if Rayner is generally rated at 1 or 2, but they don't want to take him, because they think he'll leave after 2 years, which would mean if they don't trade the pick they could be getting someone they rate at 3 at 2.

I doubt immensely that we'd trade those 2 picks for 2, so if they want two in the top 8 they'd have to throw in one of their many 2nd rounders to get our attention.

Or someone like Hall, especially if we trade them someone they want, on top of 7/8.
 
I spoke to Tommy Lynch at the Portsea Pub on NYE after he was traded. We were both barely upright and when I said I went for the Saints he gave me a hug and said "fk campaigner me too". Said if he stayed at St Kilda his career was done. I never could have imagined he'd become as good as he has. I remember thinking he was so slow and unfit. Shows what getting preseasons in can do for you.
 
RWB4life said:
As it stands but if we do a big deal with gc. Could be 7 8 and armo for 2 and hall Martin ECT and if Brisbane take dow with two would let us take LDU or rayner
Click to expand...
This will be 100% what we try and do. I can feel it in my waters! One of Dow or LDU and done... there is a nice splash of talent to the list!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Mowman said:
GC will not be interested in Armo, how many games did he play this year ?
imo they will be after some one like Newnes Webster , not a bloke who has reported he has a back of a 75 year old
Click to expand...

I have no idea about how much better the top 4 would be than what we will get with 7 and 8, but if we really wanted pick 2 I would consider 7, 8 and Jimmy for 2 and hall (no way we would get Martin thrown in for that). Maybe they throw in a pick in the 20s too

Addresses a need for us and we have guys to cover Jimmy.

Like I said tho, I have no idea about the overall benefit in 1 top 2 and hall vs 2 top 8s in this draft
 
I can't help but think trading 7 & 8 for 2 & change puts too much pressure on the recruiting team to nail pick 2. I prefer to just hit the draft with 7 & 8 & back the talent avail with those selections.

If we are looking to get pick 2 I'd only do it under the circumstances of trading 7 or 8 & something. Eg 8, 2018 2nd round pick & Armo for pick 2 & 2018 3rd round pick.
 
7, 8 and change for 2 and Hall I'd be all over.

Hall makes us immediately better by bringing plenty of what we lack to the table, while at 2 we get someone with a very high level of talent, who we'd hope would give us great service for a 15 year career, and who could also probably come straight in and contribute from year 1 as well.

If we managed to somehow wrangle a 2nd rounder during the trade period we could then use that to get some more KPD depth.

An overall outcome like that I would be thrilled with.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Would people do:

7, 8 and Jimmy
for
2, hall and 24?

Bundle 24 and hickey to try to get back into the back end of the first round

Take 2 and a pick between 15-18 to the draft
 
Keg on legs said:
Would people do:

7, 8 and Jimmy
for
2, hall and 24?

Bundle 24 and hickey to try to get back into the back end of the first round

Take 2 and a pick between 15-18 to the draft
Click to expand...
I wouldn't like to lose Jimmy and doubt they'd want him when their rebound off HB is already fine, but it would be hard to say no to that outcome.
 
bennymc7 said:
Slightly left field one but if geelong are getting ablett and stringer i reckon we should try and shake cockatoo loose...

Completely unsure how tbh..
Click to expand...

Sounds painful
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Hubnester
List Mgmt. 2025 List Management Discussion - Part V
220 221 222 223 224
Replies
6K
Views
263K
Nutsngum
Nutsngum

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top