2017 trade hypothetical thread

[HalAlaric]

Thanks for the reports and your insights and comments. Didn't really believe in this trade but would definitely enjoy seeing both McKay boys in Navy Blue. Team them up with a couple of Curnows and possibly several Silvagnis in the next 5 years.
Anyway, have met them both and both seem like genuine fellows. Hope they both have successful careers at their respected clubs.

I havent seen any games with Ben this year though. Is he injured?

 

[eth-dog]

Thanks for the reports and your insights and comments. Didn't really believe in this trade but would definitely enjoy seeing both McKay boys in Navy Blue. Team them up with a couple of Curnows and possibly several Silvagnis in the next 5 years.
Anyway, have met them both and both seem like genuine fellows. Hope they both have successful careers at their respected clubs.

I havent seen any games with Ben this year though. Is he injured?

They don't want to play for the same team anyway

 

[the rooboy]

Okay north trade this years second round pick to Carlton for Carltons 1st rounder this year and Carltons 1st rounder next year.

Then north trade there 1st rounder for Kelly, hopper, smith and Whitfield and gws 1st rounder this year and next years.

Am I doing this right.

 

[citizen-erased]

I think GWS will re-sign Kelly, $800k pa for 2 years. That squeezes out Hopper, plus maybe another.

Gibbs to Adelaide for their first rounder. On trade to GWS for Hopper

18 for Hopper is unders
that said, your 1st is overs.

Possibly a swap of Hopper & their 1st for your 1st.
Has Hopper valued at around Pick 9, which i think is fair.

 

[eth-dog]

18 for Hopper is unders
that said, your 1st is overs.

Possibly a swap of Hopper & their 1st for your 1st.
Has Hopper valued at around Pick 9, which i think is fair.

They don't have a first

 

[HalAlaric]

Okay north trade this years second round pick to Carlton for Carltons 1st rounder this year and Carltons 1st rounder next year.

Then north trade there 1st rounder for Kelly, hopper, smith and Whitfield and gws 1st rounder this year and next years.

Am I doing this right.

Wowza... terrific!

 

[citizen-erased]

They don't have a first

ah yes. Lachie, you silly ragamuffin.

 

[the rooboy]

Wowza... terrific!

Thanks I'm getting good at trading

 

[BLERN]

Okay north trade this years second round pick to Carlton for Carltons 1st rounder this year and Carltons 1st rounder next year.

Then north trade there 1st rounder for Kelly, hopper, smith and Whitfield and gws 1st rounder this year and next years.

Am I doing this right.

North are getting screwed in that deal. No need to be so realistic in a thread like this.

 

[Carlos Danger]

pickup 18 for gibbs? ok .. that sounds fair... done deal!

does that mean we won the premiership?

Nope, it means you came last, that's a fair form slump you're about to experience.

Or you gave us Cameron for 18

GWS lose 1000 draft points this year

 

[Beer n Skittles]

18 for Hopper is unders
that said, your 1st is overs.

Possibly a swap of Hopper & their 1st for your 1st.
Has Hopper valued at around Pick 9, which i think is fair.

Does everyone have Adelaide locked in for the flag?
You're right that pick 14-18 is unders, but it's around the right amount of unders for an out of contract player. Comparable to getting Tuohy for Smedts and an upgrade of an early 2nd rounder into a late 1st. Or Marchbank for a late 1st rounder, with a 2nd coming back.

They don't have a first

Yeah Carlton do.

 

[eth-dog]

Does everyone have Adelaide locked in for the flag?
You're right that pick 14-18 is unders, but it's around the right amount of unders for an out of contract player. Comparable to getting Tuohy for Smedts and an upgrade of an early 2nd rounder into a late 1st. Or Marchbank for a late 1st rounder, with a 2nd coming back.


Yeah Carlton do.

GWS don't

 

[Beer n Skittles]

GWS don't

Oh right, they didn't give that up for Deledio did they?
Makes my hypothetical more likely anyway so pretty happy with that

 

[eth-dog]

Oh right, they didn't give that up for Deledio did they?
Makes my hypothetical more likely anyway so pretty happy with that

No, draft penalties for Whitfield being a naughty boy

 

[coniglio_number1]

No, draft penalties for Whitfield being a naughty boy

Unless we trade out the pick before the draft but we will likely just cop it the following year so better to cop it now whilst we don't have a top quality academy kid

 

[the rooboy]

Say something crazy like hopper nominates north and Kelly does too. Would this years and next years 1st and this years second be enough.

 

[Bemoreboyddog]

Say something crazy like hopper nominates north and Kelly does too. Would this years and next years 1st and this years second be enough.

Depends on finishing position on the ladder. Finish bottom 4-6 then it might not be far off. Two top 10 picks is about a big a price as anyone has paid for a player so slight overs for Kelly and definitely unders then for Hopper. May have to throw in some steak knives.

 

[Topkent]

Say something crazy like hopper nominates north and Kelly does too. Would this years and next years 1st and this years second be enough.

Not crazy far off and that would be a ripping deal for north to get 2 guaranteed AFL mids for 3 picks

 

[SterlingArcher]

GWS aren't going to let Silvagni fist them.

Nobody is paying Kreuzer enough to get band 1, just because he's had a relatively injury free season doesn't mean that his previous injury history goes out the window.

Also the Saints have the Hawks pick.

Well I mean in the hypothetical that Kreuzer leaves, we would probably be getting band 1. I can't see us not offering him what he wants considering our ruck stocks - no point having Kelly and Hopper if our rucks are a combination of Phillips and Gorringe.

Unless he left for success on a lower contract, but I doubt that. It'd be a big offer that we couldn't reasonably match.

All a hypothetical anyway - no club will pay him that when Goldstein may be on the table too, and guys like Jacobs and Nankervis have been solid pick ups for little cost.

 

[Pure_Ownage]

Well I mean in the hypothetical that Kreuzer leaves, we would probably be getting band 1. I can't see us not offering him what he wants considering our ruck stocks - no point having Kelly and Hopper if our rucks are a combination of Phillips and Gorringe.

Unless he left for success on a lower contract, but I doubt that. It'd be a big offer that we couldn't reasonably match.

All a hypothetical anyway - no club will pay him that when Goldstein may be on the table too, and guys like Jacobs and Nankervis have been solid pick ups for little cost.

I am pretty sure kreuzer is unrestricted so you can't match an offer anyway.

 

[Dez!]

Well I mean in the hypothetical that Kreuzer leaves, we would probably be getting band 1. I can't see us not offering him what he wants considering our ruck stocks - no point having Kelly and Hopper if our rucks are a combination of Phillips and Gorringe.

Unless he left for success on a lower contract, but I doubt that. It'd be a big offer that we couldn't reasonably match.

All a hypothetical anyway - no club will pay him that when Goldstein may be on the table too, and guys like Jacobs and Nankervis have been solid pick ups for little cost.

Nobody is giving him a contract worth band 1 compensation with his injury history.

 

[BLERN]

Carl trade

Gibbs to adel for 1st rd pick.
Get band1 compo for kreuzer

Offer 5th round pick for pruess.
Offer 2nd rd pick for hopper
Get kelly for free via psd.
Get dusty via free agency.

Take picks 3,4 and 18 to the draft. Obviously lose 1 in gaining Kelly

 

[Nuggs Bunny]

Carl trade

Gibbs to adel for 1st rd pick.
Get band1 compo for kreuzer

Offer 5th round pick for pruess.
Offer 2nd rd pick for hopper
Get kelly for free via psd.
Get dusty via free agency.

Take picks 3,4 and 18 to the draft. Obviously lose 1 in gaining Kelly

 

[BLERN]

Are you saying it wasn't very realistic?

 

[philthy05]

What's with Carlton supporters thinking they can get band 1 for Kruezer ffs. Deluded.