Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
So if a team wants Goldstein then go for it, but Martin is contracted and we dont have a younger player at the moment who is at his level ready to step into his shoes. He is 31, but he is in the best handful of ruckman in the comp and if a team in a premiership window wants him to fit a need then a 2nd round pick is what we would want. If no one wants to offer anything near that then he just stays and plays on with us.Martin will be 31 at the start of next season and Goldstein will be available and is younger and better. + Martin has given pretty good service to Brisbane and didn't leave a few seasons ago when everyone thought he would so I'd reckon that they'll let him go for not very much if he wants to leave. A pick in the 20s is dreamland stuff.
Is he though? Archie is still a piece in work but shown he has something and the big o has come along nicely.A pick in the 20s would be almost as unlikely as a club trading their only AFL standard ruckman.
Is he though? Archie is still a piece in work but shown he has something and the big o has come along nicely.
Archie should give us first use more than Stef
I always thought TBD would sound like Edna Krabappel but look like Ned Flanders.I always thought TBD would sound a little like Lord Baelish.
I always thought TBD would sound like Edna Krabappel but look like Ned Flanders.
Disturbing on so many levels.
For me, disturbing.Disturbing or arousing?
For me, disturbing.
You, however may please yourself. And if you do I suspect that would indicate your choice.
Not that there is anything wrong with that.... no actually there is a lot wrong about that.
OK .... well the thing is....I really have no response to that.A handsome, principled man with a footlong dick is disturbing? I'm straight and I'd be up for it if he were Flanders.
OK .... well the thing is....I really have no response to that.
You win this round pulpy
I would like to see archie get a good run of games in first grade. He has shown some good signs when he has got a chance, (had a really good game v collingwood). The more games he gets the better he will be. Well worth giving him more responsibility next year. Martin thrives on being the solo ruckman, certainly plays better when he is. At 31 next year its time he took a bit of a back seat and guide our young rucks into the future.Can't see us picking up another ruck with Ballandean coming on board. I think we will back in the development of Smith and McInerney.
Where do you draw the line though pulpy?A handsome, principled man with a footlong dick is disturbing? I'm straight and I'd be up for it if he were Flanders.
The last home and away game against the Swans when Archie was rucking uncontested and still unable to give us first use wasn't a great endorsement for his ability.
Was that his inability as a ruckman or our onball division's inability to extract the pill? Can't categorically assign blame to one one component of a midfield group when that same midfield group was tracking last or there abouts for clearence work for the year IMO. Would suggest Archie has RFI's but certainly could provide something for us
Is Hall uncontracted? Would love to have him but hard to see them giving us cheap.Hope we target Thompson and Hall from the Suns. I think given the Suns' situation we could get them for cheap. So long as there aren't any major issues with either they'd add a lot to our list.
Is Hall uncontracted? Would love to have him but hard to see them giving us cheap.