Why? IMO good player and fits a need of a ruck/forward but the cost would surely outweigh the value? He is 28 this year and given his injury record you would think he probably has another 3-4 years in him max? Unlike say Sandilands, his speed and mobility is a key part of his game, but that is the bit that goes the quickest with age.
If Darcy is our next permanent ruck then such a move would possibly eat into opportunities to develop him (look already at what happens with Griffin).
If bringing him in meant the difference between being a top four contender and being an also/and then yes do it but IMO he is not in himself propel us into that space.
If Darcy is our next permanent ruck then such a move would possibly eat into opportunities to develop him (look already at what happens with Griffin).
If bringing him in meant the difference between being a top four contender and being an also/and then yes do it but IMO he is not in himself propel us into that space.
