There are a number of things that can be done differently other than just tank for an entire year in the hope of getting a pick 3 to improve the side.
Deliberately tanking for a whole season is the way that Melbourne, Carlton and others have done before - its the grass is always greener argument and it very rarely works (by itself).
Can you imagine if we tanked from the first game what impact that would have on culture, team dynamics, media views of us, sponsors, memberships.
Rather than just giving up in the hope of high draft picks the other things that can be done to promote elite on field performance are more aggressive approaches to trading and drafting; different coaching styles, culture, playing styles, different on field leadership. All these factors need to be tried before the 'nuclear option' of wholesale tanking from game 1 is tried.
We didn't tank for just one game last year when would have landed pick 1 and 18 - if we didn't do it then we aint doing it for a whole year next year.
I don't think we need to tank for a whole season to finish second or third last. Just this year we were 4-5 and getting close to the eight at the time. Only to end up winning the final game to avoid the spoon. It should be another even season.
Think about how happy everyone has been with our recent draft (whilst earlier complaining (myself included) about lack of picks). Imagine how happy everyone would be on draft night, less than a year from now having addded
1. Rankine or Walsh (or maybe Lukosious if youre that way inclined)
2. Pick 20
3. Thomas
4. Scott
5. Crocker
(Ok I might be a tad optimistic with the above, but it is a chance with a low finish and it sure as s**t isn't with a mid table finish).
Normally I wouldn't think we are capable of finishing towards the bottom but it is just so even. Whilst not a true gauge of course, just about every team is expected to improve next year to a large degree with the exception of us and GC.