Remove this Banner Ad

2018 Australian Open

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So that's 2 sets to 1.

And your saying slightly better and Edmunds wins in a tie break for those sets?

Don't reach, young blood.

If you think what the oppos conversion rates on break points was normal in those two sets you need to watch more tennis
 
Seppi is great value today against Edmund at $3-10.

Seppi coming off a great win against Karlovic and Edmund was average at best against Basilashvili in a game he easily could of lost and probably should have.

I cannot see that much of a difference ability wise and the market has Edmund a $1-35 favourite which i would not be touching.

On Seppi at a crappy 20pts an Ace and i have not spun over 20pts for ages now. :(

Not sure if you watched the game but the only reason it was close was that Edmund had a truly horrendous break point conversion ratio while Bash had a godly one - Edmund was the better player by panels.
 
If you think what the oppos conversion rates on break points was normal in those two sets you need to watch more tennis
I agree that those 2nd and 3rd sets should have gone the opposition's way based on probabilities.

I'm just saying he deservedly won the 1st set of that match, which is why saying it should've been a straight sets match wasn't right.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I'm liking Chung at the handicap v Djokovich and Cilic at the handicap v Nadal.

Chung had an impressive end to 2016 and knocked off Zverev last round (including winning 12 of the last 15 games). Also beat is Isner earlier this year, so 2 top-20 players. This is novak's first tournament after resting his elbow so perhaps a bit underdone .

Cilic pushed Nadal in shanghai at the end of last year, losing in a tight game. The main thing is he earned 5 break points off Nadal and won 2, and in their previous meeting he earned 7. Based in this I think the price on Cilic is slight overs and if he can make the breaks count this time then I think he will be competitive.


Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
 
The capital losses under the promo this year have been absolutely horrific. If punters blow all their rewards points Hills will have absolutely cleaned up.

Mine are going to my Velocity account - dollar value probably not as good but I'm trying to build up the balance for some upgrades anyway.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Is that based on taking every favourite or taking the player with the higher average of aces?

Combination of both i.e. - pretty much every sub $1.35 fave but you take guys like Karlovic at $2.50 etc
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Did anyone back Cilic? Only got my stake back, and my points. No payout on the victory.
Yes. Depends on bookie. I was on with Ladbrokes who have a 1-set retirement rule. So they pay on the player progressing as long as 1 set is completed. Some bookies still refund on retirement.

My handicap bet was void though.

Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
 
I'm liking Chung at the handicap v Djokovich and Cilic at the handicap v Nadal.

Chung had an impressive end to 2016 and knocked off Zverev last round (including winning 12 of the last 15 games). Also beat is Isner earlier this year, so 2 top-20 players. This is novak's first tournament after resting his elbow so perhaps a bit underdone .

Cilic pushed Nadal in shanghai at the end of last year, losing in a tight game. The main thing is he earned 5 break points off Nadal and won 2, and in their previous meeting he earned 7. Based in this I think the price on Cilic is slight overs and if he can make the breaks count this time then I think he will be competitive.


Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
Quite happy with this. 4 bets 3 wins. Refund on my Cilic handicap which is annoying as there was no mathematical way Nadal could cover after the 4th set...

Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2018 Australian Open

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top