I understand where you are coming from, and do agree in some respects.I think that's a pretty outrageous comment to make really, and is indicative of the drastic overrating of draft prospects vs proven performers.
I think most would agree that Smith is likely to be the second midfielder taken in this year's draft. Here's some recent second midfielders taken in drafts:
2010 - Harley Bennell (pick 2)
2011 - Dom Tyson (pick 3)
2012 - Jonathan O'Rourke (pick 2)
2013 - Jack Billings (pick 3)
2014 - Angus Brayshaw (pick 3)
2015 - Clayton Oliver (pick 4)
All of them had similar hype - if not significantly more in some cases - to what Smith has had. In hindsight, Oliver is the only one you would take over Neale. And even then, I don't think the difference between the two is enormous.
Smith might go on to be a good player, but there is a proven history of draftees being significantly overrated in comparison to proven performers. Particularly midfielders - people seem to think they're a safe bet in the top end compared to tall players, even though there are just as many examples of early draft pick midfielders failing as there are talls.
I'm just surprised how short people's memories can be when it comes to the draft. All it takes is a quick look over previous drafts to realise how much of a gamble it is. I remember making the comment in 2012 that Jimmy Toumpas looked as safe a bet as a gun midfielder as there could possibly be. That taught me a lesson.
My main concern is that we may be selling our future somewhat in trading for Neale. Yes we are trading in a known, high valued player compared to the unknown draft pick/s. But for me, I worry that Neale has a limited shelf life and while we are likely to play finals during that time, I genuinely expect our club to be fighting for a flag when the likes of Berry and McCluggage are 25 to 28 years of age. And I worry Neale won't be the same player then, as he is now.
I would 100% rather a younger Angus Brayshaw or Clayton Oliver type running out with the Berry and McCluggage than an older Lachie Neal if we were in a GF in 2023, 2024 or 2025.
There is no guarantee that the players picked at our pick 5 and ~25 will be the same quality as Neale, or Brayshaw or Oliver. But there's also no guarentee Lachie Neale will be the same player he is now, in 2023.
I look at the likes of Tom Rockliff, Dayne Beams, Daniel Rich and Hanley, and the toll the game takes on players and worry that while Neale might fast track our team development now, it's to the detriment of our future.
If it was Clayton Oliver, as I mentioned before, I'd be 100% on board, as I see him fitting our finals team list profile much better. Or if we were making a similar trade for a player the same age in two years time, againI'd be much more comfortable. It just feels we are going a bit early.