Remove this Banner Ad

2018 Draft thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlanod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

When you look at the Re-do the 2014 draft thread on the draft board you will see that Harris Andrews is consistently rated in the top 3 of that year with De Goey and Heeney. He went pick 61. There is no way we should not match for McFadyen. Hipwood is another example of local talent going for bargain picks. Payne will be another one.
 
When you look at the Re-do the 2014 draft thread on the draft board you will see that Harris Andrews is consistently rated in the top 3 of that year with De Goey and Heeney. He went pick 61. There is no way we should not match for McFadyen. Hipwood is another example of local talent going for bargain picks. Payne will be another one.
What about Dawson and Keays? :P
 
Will be interesting come draft time. I wonder if we'll give Berry a crack over McFadyen if a bid comes in while Berry is still on the draft boards. I know I would.
I think the only way we pass on McFadyen is if someone makes a bid in the top 15 or so.
 
Will be interesting to see how many picks Gold Coast take to the draft and how many they look to trade for future picks.

I believe they will be looking to trade out any picks they have outside the first two rounds, and quite possibly mid to late second round picks as well.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Will be interesting to see how many picks Gold Coast take to the draft and how many they look to trade for future picks.
I believe they will be looking to trade out any picks they have outside the first two rounds, and quite possibly mid to late second round picks as well.
You'd think a truck load given they already have 9 picks (2 1sts, 2 2nds, 2 3rds, R5, R6, R7), and expect pick 3 Lynch compo, 1st rounder for Mays, Hall and KK late 2nds to early thirds.
So to your point, they will likely have a minimum 6 picks in the first 2 rounds .... the rest are useless to them on draft day.
 
You'd think a truck load given they already have 9 picks (2 1sts, 2 2nds, 2 3rds, R5, R6, R7), and expect pick 3 Lynch compo, 1st rounder for Mays, Hall and KK late 2nds to early thirds.
So to your point, they will likely have a minimum 6 picks in the first 2 rounds .... the rest are useless to them on draft day.

That's unless they want to do a list overhaul. That's the only way I see them getting any kind of success any time soon.
 
That's unless they want to do a list overhaul. That's the only way I see them getting any kind of success any time soon.
They really don't have any choice in doing an overhaul, well in reality they will be topping up. It's almost like they will start again poor buggers. For sure they don't want the young talent they get in being flogged every week like their first seasons. My guess would be to use those lower picks to get some older hard heads in, guys that are professional and may want a coaching career. The Hodge type players if there is any outs there. they will have heaps of salary cap room you would thinks so if someone like Roughead is really available then him standing between the King twins (if they draft them) would be the way to go. I wonder if they could get someone like LeCrass from the Eagles who is apparently contemplating retirement.
 
They really don't have any choice in doing an overhaul, well in reality they will be topping up. It's almost like they will start again poor buggers. For sure they don't want the young talent they get in being flogged every week like their first seasons. My guess would be to use those lower picks to get some older hard heads in, guys that are professional and may want a coaching career. The Hodge type players if there is any outs there. they will have heaps of salary cap room you would thinks so if someone like Roughead is really available then him standing between the King twins (if they draft them) would be the way to go. I wonder if they could get someone like LeCrass from the Eagles who is apparently contemplating retirement.
There are several reports that GC do not have much salary cap space at all.

Apparently they have had to overpay massively to keep the talent they have.
 
GC are on the right rrack. They are letting go anyone who doesnt want to stay. They will load up on talent and bring in some bigger bodies who want to come to the club for more opportunity. I like the players they have been linked to. They need to adjust their payments and not overpay for players. We have put down a pretty good blueprint the last few years for them to follow.
 
Anyone else wondering whether reports of GC having no cap room are complete rubbish? I know it's been reported by traderadio (after being repeated from bigfooty), but it just doesn't sound right to me. They had a contract in front of Lynch at the mid-way point. That contract was apparently far more than he stood to gain going back to Victoria (even before AFL marketing payments). Now apparently even that space is gone? It doesn't seem to pass the basic logic test to me.
 
There are several reports that GC do not have much salary cap space at all.

Apparently they have had to overpay massively to keep the talent they have.

Then they are F*&#$d. Lynch and May, according to reports were their two highest players if they have already committed that elsewhere and cant afford a few low level professionals then they are is all sorts because their kids have a lot of development yet to justify being overpaid.
 
Anyone else wondering whether reports of GC having no cap room are complete rubbish? I know it's been reported by traderadio (after being repeated from bigfooty), but it just doesn't sound right to me. They had a contract in front of Lynch at the mid-way point. That contract was apparently far more than he stood to gain going back to Victoria (even before AFL marketing payments). Now apparently even that space is gone? It doesn't seem to pass the basic logic test to me.

That contract could easily have been back-ended, or they could have been planning to trade out other players to keep Lynch.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Actually feel sorry for Dew given the :poo: he has inherited. But apparently there were other coaching opportunities he could have take up over recent years. He just chose the wrong one.
 
Actually feel sorry for Dew given the :poo: he has inherited. But apparently there were other coaching opportunities he could have take up over recent years. He just chose the wrong one.
Including choosing not to interview for the Lions role 12 months earlier.:drunk:
 
Anyone else wondering whether reports of GC having no cap room are complete rubbish? I know it's been reported by traderadio (after being repeated from bigfooty), but it just doesn't sound right to me. They had a contract in front of Lynch at the mid-way point. That contract was apparently far more than he stood to gain going back to Victoria (even before AFL marketing payments). Now apparently even that space is gone? It doesn't seem to pass the basic logic test to me.
It was first reported by one of the SEN reporters a couple of weeks ago. That's where bigfooty first got it from. And from memory, I think it was the Suns CEO talking at a members night where SEN got it from, as at least one Suns poster mentioned it on their board, similar to how the Lions have had a couple of fan/member information/question nights.
 
It was first reported by one of the SEN reporters a couple of weeks ago. That's where bigfooty first got it from. And from memory, I think it was the Suns CEO talking at a members night where SEN got it from, as at least one Suns poster mentioned it on their board, similar to how the Lions have had a couple of fan/member information/question nights.

No way they have cap problems after Lynch and May go. Fitting them both in would have been tricky.
 
No way they have cap problems after Lynch and May go. Fitting them both in would have been tricky.

I think May and Scrimshaw going (not that he would have been on crazy amounts) will remove any issue. The reports are that they are tight-ish to the cap so can't really even try recruit beyond VFL-level players, not that they are over the cap or in danger of breaching it.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I think the only way we pass on McFadyen is if someone makes a bid in the top 15 or so.
Interesting, but if a bid comes in before our first live pick we might pass, particularly if we rate Coleman as highly as I suspect we (and potentially a number of other clubs) do.
 
I doubt with the players going out that they have a salary cap squeeze. Im sure they are much tighter then what they should be based on their ladder position, but they need to get their house in order with contracts. We were no different not long ago.
 
You'd think a truck load given they already have 9 picks (2 1sts, 2 2nds, 2 3rds, R5, R6, R7), and expect pick 3 Lynch compo, 1st rounder for Mays, Hall and KK late 2nds to early thirds.
So to your point, they will likely have a minimum 6 picks in the first 2 rounds .... the rest are useless to them on draft day.

Could think trading out for future picks could be of interest, in an effort for them to spread the pick surplus across drafts. Wouldn't be against trading our future first for one of theirs this year if it was a good deal and our recruiters rated this draft...particularly if we lose our current top pick in trading for Neale.
 
Could think trading out for future picks could be of interest, in an effort for them to spread the pick surplus across drafts. Wouldn't be against trading our future first for one of theirs this year if it was a good deal and our recruiters rated this draft...particularly if we lose our current top pick in trading for Neale.

It is funny actually, if we get Neale, Freo get Hogan and Melbourne get May, we could trade our first next year for what would be the pick we started with anyway. GC won't give up their 2-3 combo, lets them take King twins if they want to (they take one then they will take both)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom