Blacky
The King
- May 9, 2006
- 46,808
- 68,031
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Denver Broncos & Gold City Royals
It’s part of the excitementHappy to see I'm not the only one who finds our commissioner baffling.
What will GG do next, often unilaterally
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s part of the excitementHappy to see I'm not the only one who finds our commissioner baffling.
What will GG do next, often unilaterally
Best 20 dollars you’ll piss away all year
Its just like cutthroat then, but in empire we pay for the privilege.
Ok I have completed War and Peace empire-style. Go to MFL Empire home page and everything should be there.
Any questions, please ask.
Auction waivers you have 1000 dollars to spend for the month of August. It's fake money. Doesn't count towards your cap. Just for the use of that month.Thanks for that GG, just the one question, what is the salary on auction waivers and for picking up people off the waiver wire? Is it based purely on the previous seasons performance or is there some sort of deduction because they are on waivers ?
Auction waivers you have 1000 dollars to spend for the month of August. It's fake money. Doesn't count towards your cap. Just for the use of that month.
Otherwise rest of the season is normal wiaver wire system. No dollars, no bids. You just make a claim and it depends on where you are in the waiver order.
Until there are official standings after week 1, the Sept 1 to Sept 5 waivers, the order would be timestamp of the waiver claim, whoever put a claim in earlier.
All players in the waiver pool are Free Agents. If they had 0 years at the start of this season, I already recalculated their new salary (based on what they scored in 2017) and by default they all get a 1 year contract.Sigh, did you even read my question?
I know all of that. I was asking if you have to pay a player on waivers 100% of his calculated salary from the previous year or if there is any sort of deduction because he is on waivers?
In the real world if a player was on waivers and can't get what he wants he would sign a one year deal on a discount to "prove it"
There's already a HUGE amount of things I have to do as commish in terms of updating salaries and creating aspects that require my constant attention. Sometimes it's just too much on me, and making things simple helps. In this regard, it's easier for me to just have it where a player only gets a new salary calculated when they hit 0 years.You have answered the question above cheers for clearing it up; i had already typed out this so
For example; Blake Martinez had a huge year (fantasy wise) as the MLB last year for the Packers, his salary for next year is now 3.7m making him one of the most highly paid LBs in fantasy, but the Packers stilll have doubts on him being the long term answer. Why would anyone sign him to a deal on that salary with so much doubt around his actual worth? Obviously he warrants being on a roster, aside from franchise tagging him, anyone else looking to pick him up would be mad at his current salary.
Im not trying to reinvent the wheel or tell you how it should be done, just giving some food for thought in terms of player movement and having guys who can contribute for teams yet are sitting on the waiver wire all year because they had a fantastic previous season and no one wanting to touch them because of their huge salary.
There's already a HUGE amount of things I have to do as commish in terms of updating salaries and creating aspects that require my constant attention. Sometimes it's just too much on me, and making things simple helps. In this regard, it's easier for me to just have it where a player only gets a new salary calculated when they hit 0 years.
Day 1 joined and already want to behead the king and change the worldGG Bot needs an upgrade
No worries, its fine mate, i appreciate the work you do.
Day 1 joined and already want to behead the king and change the world
Isn't that a waste of a tag on Smith? New contract over 5M so you get a second anyway and who is going to want him at that price when he will almost certainly drastically regress in the first year of a new system yet again?
Maybe I should have said nothing.
Starting QBs are not required, ask the Eagles or GG.exe
If he wants to waste $1m of cap space for the peace of mind of actually having a starting QB, let him