Then you could look at it the other way without your obvious bias towards France. France would be counting their lucky stars they got out of the game. You can say they dominated and were in control, but if the Socceroos can survive that dominance and be within a bees dick of getting some points, then playing at a similar standard against Peru and Denmark could easily see them win. The press has every right to get around the Socceroos because their performance against the star studded French line up was extremely commendable, when most people thought they would get blown away.
Yeah, I'm really not at all biased on this issue, the stats say France dominated. Yes it would have been epic to get away with a point but as it is we got no points and showed some real cause for concern that the major problem with the Ange era Socceroos is still present- no one remotely capable of turning possession into genuine chances.
Absolutely we could beat Denmark and Peru, but as I said earlier I think our best chance is heavy duty defence against what should be less fluent attacks than France and pray for a lucky break in the other direction- basically the kind of freak chance that got us a goal against France despite us creating really no genuine scoring chances.
Teams sometimes win that way but it's hardly a probable outcome, particularly when we need to get lucky twice in a row to advance- it's just the only option with such a shitty attack.
The only other possibility is that Marwijk deliberately went hyper defensive just to get the France game out of the way and will name a far more attacking lineup from this point forward. I'd be a bit more hopeful of that if the likes of Rogic and Juric didn't have 2-3 solid years of burning chances in front of goal in the green and gold.
Last edited: