Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion 2018 Non-Crows Discussion Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deaneus!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's ok, I know how you really feel about the comment......
Zb75ya0.jpg

Dav3's reaction to subaru liking his post

celebration-animated-gif-8.gif
 
Why do they have to record it all?

Seems to me it’s either real or not real

I have a feeling that you're testing me so I have to admit that my accounting knowledge is somewhat rusty after 20 years.

From an accounting point of view it's real as every transaction needs a corresponding one on the other side of the ledger so any depreciation/write down of assets is recorded as a non cash business expense.

From an operating profit/loss point of view, however, depreciation has no direct impact.

We, along with most other clubs in the AFL, report and judge the performance of the club on the operating profit/loss and not on the overall profit and loss statement.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Apparently they won trade week



Apparently

Again?

They win trade week every year. Results don't lie.

Knocked out in the also-rans final last season, 9th and 10th the previous two. Imagine how bad they'd be
if they didn't win trade week every year.
 
No I’m not.

I’m no expert but all these people saying it doesn’t matter, so I’m wondering how is it we need to record it if it doesn’t matter?

I may be wrong on this but, I believe that depreciation is best used when a profit is made so it can go against making a profit and therefore not pay any tax. Maybe it helps in getting the AFL to demand less or give more. As for the smears, they need to show that they can make a profit or the AFL may send them to China, permanently.
 
I may be wrong on this but, I believe that depreciation is best used when a profit is made so it can go against making a profit and therefore not pay any tax. Maybe it helps in getting the AFL to demand less or give more. As for the smears, they need to show that they can make a profit or the AFL may send them to China, permanently.

Best used makes it sound like a choice

Is it a choice? And if it is a choice why put it in to take it straight back out again
 
No I’m not.

I’m no expert but all these people saying it doesn’t matter, so I’m wondering how is it we need to record it if it doesn’t matter?

..I assume you’re trolling but I’ll have a go

It does matter

profits are great, but depreciation is sneaky

You have to make profits after depreciation, or by the time whatever asset you’re depreciating falls apart, you won’t be able to replace it
 
OneGreatPullTheOtherOne reckons their new sponsor is a cleaning company

Hahahaha
Best cleaning company in the world couldn't get all the shit out of Alberton !
 
OneGreatPullTheOtherOne reckons their new sponsor is a cleaning company

Hahahaha
Best cleaning company in the world couldn't get all the shit out of Alberton !
A cleaning company? MyMop ? Surely there cant be too many national companies. It must be state based then. Which makes a mockery of the '' hype'
 

Remove this Banner Ad

So the prick has to wear a shirt with a Richmond emblem on it ........is this guy just a wannabe shit stirrer of a journalist..... and i say this with all due respect to proper journalists

 
A cleaning company? MyMop ? Surely there cant be too many national companies. It must be state based then. Which makes a mockery of the '' hype'
Don't worry, you can be sure that it will be the greatest cleaning company in the world that opens up new markets for them and delivers more than anything the Crows are stuck with.

As far as the profit discussion goes ... who cares about all the accounting anomalies? Just compare all the clubs under the same rules. Show us what came in, what went out, and how much was left over.

Something like:

Income
- memberships
- gate takings
- sponsorship
- other

Expenditure
- players wages and bonuses
- coaches wages and bonuses
- other football operations costs
- marketing / advertising
- other

Profit/Loss
 
So the prick has to wear a shirt with a Richmond emblem on it ........is this guy just a wannabe shit stirrer of a journalist..... and i say this with all due respect to proper journalists


has he been to Advanced Hair while he has been away, looks like he has more hair
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So the prick has to wear a shirt with a Richmond emblem on it ........is this guy just a wannabe shit stirrer of a journalist..... and i say this with all due respect to proper journalists


Lucky you pointed it out
It almost disappeared under all that floppy neck skin !

Truly a complete moron
 
I may be wrong on this but, I believe that depreciation is best used when a profit is made so it can go against making a profit and therefore not pay any tax. Maybe it helps in getting the AFL to demand less or give more. As for the smears, they need to show that they can make a profit or the AFL may send them to China, permanently.
Certainly some big corporations have used depreciation to their advantage... Particularly before they just moved their profits offshore, Brown AFC's books would be straightforward without much wriggle room to manipulate (apart from the post footy park write down).
 
OneGreatPullTheOtherOne reckons their new sponsor is a cleaning company

Hahahaha
Best cleaning company in the world couldn't get all the shit out of Alberton !
Jim's cleaning with a sponsor comeback?
 
So the prick has to wear a shirt with a Richmond emblem on it ........is this guy just a wannabe shit stirrer of a journalist..... and i say this with all due respect to proper journalists



Didn't realise David Wildy has Italian heritage. its a nice photo of him and his Nonno.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom