Opinion 2018 Non-Crows Discussion Thread

[Pea Nut]

Baiting trolls is really secondary - all it does is create work for me - it's more for my own amusement.

Pls. Bait the hell out of them, then ban the fools every time they bite. Would then keep the bullshit off this board through the year.

 

[mistylake]

Baiting trolls is really secondary - all it does is create work for me - it's more for my own amusement.

I think you’ve got a fun thread there in the making.

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

The AFL was always using Port as an entry point into China and to test the waters. They were kidding themselves if they thought the AFL would let them have it solo.

It was win : win.

AFL get an inroad into China.

Port get to attract a big major sponsor.

Wait, what?

 

[BRL121]

Pls. Bait the hell out of them, then ban the fools every time they bite. Would then keep the bullshit off this board through the year.

To put this above board, Deaneus should stop baiting, which should be allocated to non-moderators, and he should concentrate on the resultant banning. In that way, moderator conflicts of interest are avoided.

 

[Enviable Tradition]

Port will pay Ollie countless millions so that he stays

And a lifetime pass for the Port Club buffet

I thought we already spent our millions on Boak, Ryder, Dixon, Polec, Motlop etc. etc.?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[Enviable Tradition]

Oh yeah I know why it’s there and very creative.
I’m amazed no bites yet considering the way they are more interested in our situation rather than their own. Maybe they’ve been scared off by the knob end getting suspended the other day.

We just aren't that concerned because our club has a good record of signing who we want to keep.



Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[GreyCrow]

We just aren't that concerned because our club has a good record of signing who we want to keep.

Love a loophole

Pony up: Do you want to keep Ollie?

 

[hey shorty]

They're even good at keeping guys they don't want to

 

[Pea Nut]

They're even good at keeping guys they don't want to

And paying blokes big salaries even though they now play for an opposition club !!

 

[Samcro24]

We just aren't that concerned because our club has a good record of signing who we want to keep.



Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Too bad they're shit at football.

 

[Swooping Crow]

We just aren't that concerned because our club has a good record of signing who we want to keep.



Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

The same players that were spanked by us in a record losing Showdown. Yep everyone wants those players.

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

We just aren't that concerned because our club has a good record of signing who we want to keep.



Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

They’re all yours

 

[fabs33]

Love a loophole

Pony up: Do you want to keep Ollie?

Look up "no true Scotsman".

 

[FR0GGY]

We just aren't that concerned because our club has a good record of signing who we want to keep.



Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I remember them, Lobbe and Hartlett. Good times.

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

I remember them, Lobbe and Hartlett. Good times.

And Shaun Burgoyne.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

We just aren't that concerned because our club has a good record of signing who we want to keep.



Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Jacobs walked from your club to the Roos & you wanted to keep him.

 

[Swooping Crow]

And Shaun Burgoyne.

Worst 300 game player Five minute Fireman.

 

[Enviable Tradition]

Love a loophole

Pony up: Do you want to keep Ollie?

Yes

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[FR0GGY]

Jacobs walked from your club to the Roos & you wanted to keep him.

Hang on they didnt want Jacobs.... oh you meant that one..

 

[Pea Nut]

We just aren't that concerned because our club has a good record of signing who we want to keep.



Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

And making a real habit out of signing players that even Melbourne didn't want to keep.

 

[subaru]

From the AFL:

McLachlan said AFLX had been several years in the making and, based on the success of the tournament that kicks off next week, could be a way of taking Australia's game to an international audience.

"We have had trouble taking our game internationally. This is not our traditional game, AFL X, but it's got all the best bits of it," McLachlan said.

"It means that we could go to Hong Kong in November next year not only with two clubs, but we could take six clubs and play a mini-tournament.

"To take our game and showcase all the best bits of it, and actually not have to build infrastructure like we did in Shanghai, for example, that presents a huge opportunity." ​

Did I read correctly? If so, AFLX a massive punch in the face to the Power China strategy?

Ahaha
Ahahahahahahaha
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


Ha

 

[bomberclifford]

Jacobs walked from your club to the Roos & you wanted to keep him.

lol. You’re not really using Ben Jacobs as a case study with a straight face are you?

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

lol. You’re not really using Ben Jacobs as a case study with a straight face are you?

The comment was made you don't lose anyone you don't want to... so just pointing out this is false.

Don't talk up crap on our board & expect it to go through to the keeper without being picked up as being crap!

 

[matty p]

I thought we already spent our millions on Boak, Ryder, Dixon, Polec, Motlop etc. etc.?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

You have. But you'll free up some coin when you trade away Boak at the end of the year.

 

[Deaneus!]