2018 PODs

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Duncan 94 points, was content with that considering he only went at around 65% efficiency which he usually does better than that.

Also currently I’m not worried about him not having much centre bounce time once Dangerfield comes in, because in the QF loss and the SF win last year I’m pretty sure Duncan had 0 centre bounce attendances or hardly any and still racked it up & scored highly, so I’m backing him in.

Ablett, J. Selwood & Dangerfield getting it out to Duncan :hearteyes:
 
More misses than hits with my pods
Misses
Rioli - I'm actually ok with his scoring. Will get better after that first game
Byrne - as above
Lycett - real concern, give him one more week
Bont - real concern, but must persist and hope wbd turn it around

Hits
Marchbank - looks like a keeper
JOM - looks lively
 

Log in to remove this ad.

More misses than hits with my pods
Misses
Rioli - I'm actually ok with his scoring. Will get better after that first game
Byrne - as above
Lycett - real concern, give him one more week
Bont - real concern, but must persist and hope wbd turn it around

Hits
Marchbank - looks like a keeper
JOM - looks lively

Mate you certainly went all out POD. :eek:

Big kudos to you for trying something different! :moustache:
 
Have never actually bothered to look at my players ownership % apart from Lobb but here are all mine

Lobb 2%

McLean 6%

Venables 8%

Goldstein 6%


and a few that are between 10% and 20%

Bonner 13%

Savage 12%

Danger 17%
 
Have never actually bothered to look at my players ownership % apart from Lobb but here are all mine

Lobb 2%

McLean 6%

Venables 8%

Goldstein 6%


and a few that are between 10% and 20%

Bonner 13%

Savage 12%

Danger 17%
Wow, can't believe how close Danger and Bonner are
 
Lobb (2%)- 97 ✓- More of the same would be perfect. 22 BE.
Beams (4%)- 69 :thumbsdown: Looked like he ran out of legs, will bounce back.
McGovern (5%)- 82 :think: Will take 82 in the wet, even the commentators said he wasn't himself but still managed an 82 which is OK.
Lambert (5)- 71:thumbsdown: 71 points in 3 quarters is decent, but need an improvement.
McLean (6%)- 91 ✓ Exactly what I am after, consistent 90-100 scores each week
Kreuzer (7%)- 74:thumbsdown: Simply unlucky, was looking like a masterstroke prior to the injury.

Overall my PODs were average, however certainly expecting a return to form this week.

We picked them for a reason, stick with your gut :moustache:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Howe - slow start but was better after half time, Pies were also trash which doesn't help
Neale - 99 in a thumping is good
Beams - better for the run, solid first half
Parker - 149, nuff said. His goal was cooked
Selwood - continues to be a weapon
Libba - ouch, straight swap for Cogs
Goldy - 85 at half time, finishing on 105 is disappointing. It seemed he didn't have much impact in the last when the big points were up for grabs
Menegola - can only get better, had a stinker with FAs
Lobb - good score for a bloke with limited match fitness, hoping he stays around this mark
 
Dangerfield (16.5%) :moustache::moustache::moustache:

giphy.gif
 
McGov
Bonner
Beams
S. Martin
McLean

Wins
Martin - 111 in a losing effort, we take those
McLean - 91 with more upside now Libba is out, cheers
Bonner - 119 enough said, he played so well I'm pretty sure he isn't even a POD now.

Pass mark
McGov - 82, wasn't a great game but gets a pass mark

Losses
Beams - 69 Yikes, needs to lift - as many others have said started well finished poorly, hopefully he just needed to blow out the cobwebs
 
One POD- Luke Parker. Thanks very much friend.

Although I'll have Goldy after I * Ryder off this week.
 
I love having PODs, but only 4 real ones off the bat this year. Sometimes a POD is not having too many PODs :moustache:

Beams 69 - as mentioned, better for the long run, expect a crazy month of 130 avg at one point, hopefully stays fit
Lambert 71 - after being 0 at QT is actually quite good, especially since he ran about 1km per disposal. Jury's out, watch this week
Stef 111 - Love it, solid performance. Surprised he was less than 10% tbh. Stay away Archie!
Lloyd 119 - Brilliant, expect this most weeks from a very silky ball user.

One Super Juicy POD I will look at, and did a lot pre season but waited to see how his team will go as a whole, is Cameron. If GWS look like they will be demolishing most teams every week, Punchable and Cameron very quickly find their way into my fwd line. Much like Port, however there are too many blokes in Ports full forward line to share points.
 
POD i have is Blake Acres.
I have aching balls, someone wanna help me?
 
My team is very cookie cutter, but reasonably happy with my 5 POD's so far. Dunkley the only real gamble but was cheap @ 296k, could still become Buddy/Heeney/Curnow next week with my left over cash though.

Walters 10.8% (83) X factor- high ceiling.
Shaw 7.8% (114) was between him and Hibberd for D2 looking like a good call so far
Kreuzer 6.3% (74) will be even more of a POD once half his owners trade him out this week
McLean 5.6% (91) will get a lot more mid time now. Needs to remember how to milk those head high free kicks
Dunkley 2.5% (87) hopefully he gets some mid time with Libba injury
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top