Prediction 2018 Rising Star

Remove this Banner Ad

cd4089620df5ddc6faf399ecf538934b.gif


Worpedo!

Although i find Sier a little unlucky, 27 and 5 tackles is probably equal to 23 and 8 tackles but the goal he kicked might have pushed him over if not for the amount of hype surrounding worpel this week.
If seir played for another club you mean
 
The argument is;

Stephenson - kicks goals in a winning, high scoring team
Witherden - in the top bracket of rebounding half backs

Depends what you value more. Being in the top handful of small forwards at a winning club or being in the top handful of rebounding defenders in the league.


That's a easy one
Goal kicking midfielder with pace to burn

Most highly sort after commodity in the league his type

Lay down misere
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That's a easy one
Goal kicking midfielder with pace to burn

Most highly sort after commodity in the league his type

Lay down misere

That would be all well and good but he hasn't shown that he can play midfield.

If playing midfield is important then Rayner or Higgins would be ahead of Stephenson
 
The argument is;

Stephenson - kicks goals in a winning, high scoring team
Witherden - in the top bracket of rebounding half backs

Depends what you value more. Being in the top handful of small forwards at a winning club or being in the top handful of rebounding defenders in the league.
Wait, you think that Witherden is one of the best in his position in the entire competition?

Not trying to knock the kid and I do think he’s a good player, but surely you jest?
 
Wait, you think that Witherden is one of the best in his position in the entire competition?

Not trying to knock the kid and I do think he’s a good player, but surely you jest?

He's not as good as Laird who should be all australian but he's up there with guys like Hurn, Simpson, Shaw, Houli, etc. in that distributor role. And it's reflected by his metres gained and score involvement averages.
 
He's not as good as Laird who should be all australian but he's up there with guys like Hurn, Simpson, Shaw, Houli, etc. in that distributor role. And it's reflected by his metres gained and score involvement averages.
With all due respect the bloke playing half back for us we got of you is WAY ahead in that spot too

Obvious
 
If seir played for another club you mean


HAWTHORN v GEELONG
10 Patrick Dangerfield (GEEL)
6 James Worpel (HAW)
4 Shaun Burgoyne (HAW)
3 Jaeger O'Meara (HAW)
3 Gary Ablett (GEEL)
3 Isaac Smith (HAW)
1 Tom Mitchell (HAW)

COLLINGWOOD v BRISBANE
10 Taylor Adams (COLL)
7 Jack Crisp (COLL)
4 Brodie Grundy (COLL)
3 Jordan De Goey (COLL)
2 Scott Pendlebury (COLL)
2 Levi Greenwood (COLL)
1 Harris Andrews (BL)
1 Dayne Beams (BL)

the coaches obviously dont agree that Sier deserves the Rising Star nom this week and Worpel got votes from both coaches on the weekend.... you're just wrong
 
Sorry mixed up with Pearce and shaw lol
Beams rich no brainer too

Yeah it was a no brainer in the sense that the both had similar stats except Rich played every game (and had an obviously elite weapon with his left boot) while Beams only played 18.

Beams obviously had the better career since but to call him a no brainer for the RS is dumb as s**t lol.

It's the same reason Taylor beat Bont - because 23 good games is worth more than 16 slightly better games.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It was a no brainer. Rich was clearly better.
And where did both teams finish that year?

Bit harder to stand out in a top team , harder to get games and make an impact

Rich had a better year lol
Taylor better than bont

Really biased award always has been

Like all australian
 
Stitched up
Pendelbury top 4 team top5 finish b/f selwood 10 th more goals more clearances
Beams
Shaw
Bont

Yeah quality award
Lmao
 
And where did both teams finish that year?

Bit harder to stand out in a top team , harder to get games and make an impact

Rich had a better year lol
Taylor better than bont

Really biased award always has been

Like all australian

Look at the stats though. Rich literally had 100 more kicks and 60 more tackles than Beams.
Taylor had 120 more disposals and 40 more marks than Bont.

You just cannot seem to grasp the concept that the award goes to whoever has had the best season, not some arbitrary measure of who has the most potential. When you play every game in a season, you're at a massive advantage over those that play 18 or 16.
 
And where did both teams finish that year?

Bit harder to stand out in a top team , harder to get games and make an impact

Rich had a better year lol
Taylor better than bont

Really biased award always has been

Like all australian

Rich was tagged in a final. He was a damaging midfielder. Look at how influential he was in the last quarter comeback when we won the final.

Stitched up
Pendelbury top 4 team top5 finish b/f selwood 10 th more goals more clearances
Beams
Shaw
Bont

Yeah quality award
Lmao

And your boy is gonna win it this year. It's a silly award that Collingwood fans seem to be very invested in.
 
Yeah it was a no brainer in the sense that the both had similar stats except Rich played every game (and had an obviously elite weapon with his left boot) while Beams only played 18.

Beams obviously had the better career since but to call him a no brainer for the RS is dumb as s**t lol.

It's the same reason Taylor beat Bont - because 23 good games is worth more than 16 slightly better games.


Ok if we use that as a parameter

Why did selwood beat pendels

More games more goals less freekicks of course

Get the drift

Shaw was robbed
Pendels was robbed
Stepho will get robbed

Never not once has there ever been any collingwood input in anything

All aussie
Team of century
Rising star
Mark of the year

Gee pattern emerging
 
Ok if we use that as a parameter

Why did selwood beat pendels

More games more goals less freekicks of course

Get the drift

Shaw was robbed
Pendels was robbed
Stepho will get robbed

Never not once has there ever been any collingwood input in anything

All aussie
Team of century
Rising star
Mark of the year

Gee pattern emerging

Aaawwwww poor widle Collingwood.

Not winning any of the 4 most BS awards possible. Must be tough
 
Last edited:
Ok if we use that as a parameter

Why did selwood beat pendels

More games more goals less freekicks of course

Get the drift

Shaw was robbed
Pendels was robbed
Stepho will get robbed

Never not once has there ever been any collingwood input in anything

All aussie
Team of century
Rising star
Mark of the year

Gee pattern emerging

That's why I'm invested
 
Aaawwwww poor widle Collingwood.
So you use stats as a argument but can't explain why that's a parameter not frequently used across the board

Very selective reasoning you think?


Oh I got it
It's a pr award , used to exite fly by night supporters
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top