Yeah pretty much.
You maligned Cripps because "an Oliver-led midfield beat Carlton by over 100 points". As though Oliver was the reason for that margin?
If that's not your view, then don't over-egg the pudding by suggesting Melbourne flogging Carlton proves Oliver > Cripps. It doesn't.
WC pumped Richmond. Does that prove McGovern > Rance? No, it doesn't.
Well, that's irrational. Cripps has had huge impact on games but the rest of the team are a rabble.