Riviat
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2017
- Posts
- 17,036
- Reaction score
- 38,329
- Location
- The Capital
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- 76ers
New look team structure until the next change 
4/0/4
5/0/6
2/0/1
1/4/3

4/0/4
5/0/6
2/0/1
1/4/3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Super Bowl LVIII Notice Image
New England Patomans v Seattle Microsofts - Live Game Chat Now
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.

Locked and Loaded, he was picked right after I slotted Danger into M1. Super confident this kid will do special things this year.SexyBurton locked campaigner?

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Slightly off kilter to most by the looks
0/4/4
6/1/4
2/0/1
0/5/3
I reckon it's best to start with the pure mids. Generally speaking they are going to score more points, so may as well make the most of it. But I get where you're coming from.Not sure best place for this but a question; let's say a MID (e.g. Adams) gets DPP status - is it more beneficial to start with this player over a pure MID (e.g. Kelly) if you predict they will average similarly, or is it better to start with the pure Mid and trade for the DPP. Or is there no advantage either way?
Benefits of switching Adams back may be better options to bring in a MID than whichever DEF he replaces, but perhaps it would be more beneficial to instead have an extra DEF upgrade/premium target to plan around the byes?
Literally the two players mentioned - in trying to consider which way to lean, this thought process came about. There are a couple of other player choices that could go that way also, so curious if anyone thought it was a consideration point or not. Thanks for reply.Any player in particular you're thinking of doing this with?
Adams is mid only thoughLiterally the two players mentioned - in trying to consider which way to lean, this thought process came about. There are a couple of other player choices that could go that way also, so curious if anyone thought it was a consideration point or not. Thanks for reply.
lol if you go with 450k and up I have 2 midpricers and Lycett1-4-3
4-1-6
2-0-1
1-4-3
How did it get to this....... kill me now ...

New look team structure until the next change
4/0/4
5/0/6
2/0/1
1/4/3
If I set the Mid-pricer range to $230k - $450k, then I'mlol if you go with 450k and up I have 2 midpricers and Lycett![]()
you call this funIf I set the Mid-pricer range to $230k - $450k, then I'm
3-0-5
5-0-6
2-0-1
2-3-3
There's no way in hell I end up with so many unproven players... just want the round 1 teams to drop so I can do my team properly, it's all just a bit of fun now
