- Joined
- Aug 17, 2012
- Posts
- 14,285
- Reaction score
- 21,404
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
I would have thought pick 5 for Wingard would be best case scenario.
-
Rd 7 Reviews + Club Forums »
WB v SYD · RIC v MEL · HAW v GCS · ESS v COL · PA v GEE · FRE v CAR · StK v WCE · BL v ADE · GWS v NM ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
Prediction 2018 trade hypothetical thread
- Thread starter Groin guru
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
I would have thought pick 5 for Wingard would be best case scenario.
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 9,139
- Reaction score
- 6,332
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
What do Syndye need + edited it as you posted that.
Probably really out of whack trade but make of it what you will. Not a prediction but just for fun.
Gotta love a 7 way trade
Freo out: Neale, Pick 6 & 25
Freo in: Hogan, Lobb & Pick 13
Dees out: Hogan
Dees in: Pick 6 & 27
GWS out: Lobb & 25
GWS in: Sydney 2019 1st & Freo 2019 2nd
Sydney out: 13 & 2019 1st
Sydney in: Pick 7 & 23
Lions out: Pick 5, 23 & Mayes
Lions in: Neale
Similar trade to what’s being rumoured + Mayes
Port out: Wingard
Port in: Pick 5 & Mayes
Dogs out: Pick 7 & 27
Dogs in: Wingard
Dees get a good dip at the draft or they can trade pick 6 to GC for May (think May will be held to his contract at GC this year)
GWS get fair compensation for Lobb 13-18ish although in a supposed weak draft &
Freo get their 2 big targets for Neale and an early pick downgrade in which they could use for Ian Hill in which they need more of his type according to a couple Freo fans I’ve spoken to.
This allows Sydney to draft a player before a bid on Blakey in which they’ll use Pick 23 & 33 to match any bid following 7.
Brisbane get their desired player over which they’ll be happy to pay slight overs if any for a guy who is keen to go to Brisbane.
5 & Mayes compared to 7 & 27 values Mayes at about Pick 38 and Port would be desperate for that higher Pick so they won’t mind paying slight overs for Mayes to achieve that since they want to get their hands on at least one of those highly rated SA draftees and maybe have a choice between 2 of them.
Dogs get their man in which their very keen on for a fair price.
Very telling that in these trade scenarios that screw over port the explanation is always that they would be desperate to get a pick but the same desperation is never applied to teams chasing after our players? Hawks and dogs are so apparently nonchalant someone should check to see if they have a pulse.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2003
- Posts
- 26,916
- Reaction score
- 30,913
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Soft spot for Brisbane
What? That's all you could reasonably expect for Wingard.
This from a supporter base that has been arguing mitch McGovern is a top ten pick because he is contracted
Wingard >>> daylight >>> still more daylight >>> Wingards little finger >>> daylight >>> mitch McGovern
Silly question but why would the Swans take Carlton's two second round picks (equating to pick 10 in points value) when we could get West Coasts two second round picks (equation to pick 6), which they could use for Kelly?
Silly question number 2
How do North acquire Tyson (if the rumours are right) and Hall via trade and then have enough points to get Tarryn Thomas and Bailey Scott via the academy/FS system?
How do North acquire Tyson (if the rumours are right) and Hall via trade and then have enough points to get Tarryn Thomas and Bailey Scott via the academy/FS system?
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 9,139
- Reaction score
- 6,332
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2014
- Posts
- 1,869
- Reaction score
- 3,422
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur FC
What would STK need to give in addition to our 2019 first for Gold Coast's pick 3? Would have to be fairly substantial I'd imagine
Re speculated McGovern trade I'd see ADEL's second rounder coming back to CARL and 42 off to the CROWS as well. Win/win all-around.
I wonder if the Crows are thinking a trade now of 14 & 16? (their first pick) to GCS for Pick 3 and grab one of those top SA kids?
I wonder if the Crows are thinking a trade now of 14 & 16? (their first pick) to GCS for Pick 3 and grab one of those top SA kids?
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 9,139
- Reaction score
- 6,332
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
Where would they get pick 14 from?
EDIT: Pick 13 is Sydney
CARL to SYD: 26 & 28
SYD to CARL: 13
CARL to ADEL: McAdam, 13 & 42
ADEL to CARL: McGovern & 21
ADEL to GCS: 8 (or 13) & 16
GCS to ADEL: 2 (or 3 if 13 used).
Pick 2 or 3 used on Jack Lukosius or Izak Rankine. And still have 8 or 13.
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 9,139
- Reaction score
- 6,332
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
I think the McGovern will be as simple as 13 & McAdam for McGovern
Then Adelaide to GC
13, 16 & 21 to GC for 3 & 29/32
It might be unless Carlton need 21 to land Setterfield if 43 won't cut it with GWS. 68 to COLL for Fasolo and 76 on Father/Son Ben Silvangi.
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2005
- Posts
- 210,053
- Reaction score
- 98,130
- Location
- Sydney
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans
43 is way unders. 21 is probably about right for Setterfield
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 9,139
- Reaction score
- 6,332
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
43 won’t get the deal across the line for Setterfield but Adelaide won’t give up 21 in McGovern deal.
2019 2nd & 43 might get Setterfield across.
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2013
- Posts
- 11,125
- Reaction score
- 13,347
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Why would GC want more later picks rather than the top end stuff? IMO they need stars, probably a better bet the star comes at 3
Mitchell54 Yup - you were right. McGovern deal done.
I'll keep my fingers crossed that perhaps 43 & that 2019 Third could do the trick. Fas will come without anything as free agent?
I'll keep my fingers crossed that perhaps 43 & that 2019 Third could do the trick. Fas will come without anything as free agent?
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
I'd agree that this years draft is very deep so landing 3 first rounders is better than landing 2.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2007
- Posts
- 34,628
- Reaction score
- 26,673
- Location
- Melbourne, Victoria
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Chicago Bulls
Having 2 and 3 is better than 13, 16 and 21.
No way should GC give up 3 for that package.
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2005
- Posts
- 210,053
- Reaction score
- 98,130
- Location
- Sydney
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans
Not if the plan is to draft the King boys to mitigate go home factor.
Have you seen Aaron Hall play or you just don't rate him? He is worth a 1st rounder, early 2nd rounder at the very worst. A gun.
To be a little more transparent i was alluding to how will North get TT and Bailey Scott, and get the other trades happening? A lot of North supporters were vocal about not getting Blakely but looking at it now, in all likelihood they probably wouldn't have enough draft picks/points to pick up all academy/FS selections (TT, Scott & Blakey) anyway - (providing there were 1st round bids for all players by opposition clubs).
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2016
- Posts
- 10,176
- Reaction score
- 17,194
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Bayern Munich
Essentially i would think it comes down to the old saying:
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
You wanted to downgrade your picks for points to get Blakely, this gives you an extra 300 points i believe.
Apart form the fact those WCE picks equate to pick 6 which is well beyond the point differential cap placed on pick only swaps (without other picks going back) - there is no guarantee that WCE were even willing to put them on the table.
They were smart business wise to take an offer they had right in front of them instead of holding out for one that might have come.
They can now move on and get involved in other trades if they want.
Similar threads
