You know why Chris Gayle doesn't play in the BBL.
And all his WI compatriots?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know why Chris Gayle doesn't play in the BBL.
OK, forget gayle. Look at some of the other bigger name internationals: Russell, Cottrell, Mendis, Amla, Perera, Fernando. Plus just about every top level Pakistani player which would add another 10 nmaes to that list. Plus most of the better Afghanistan players.You know why Chris Gayle doesn't play in the BBL.
Yep, if they are serious about it, they need all Aus players available for it. In addition, 3 international players for each side would immediately lift the standard.We seem to hold the BBL in competition with the Bangladesh Premier League. They seem to be a bigger drawcard for internationals than us, for example Chris Gayle is playing over there right now.
Sad to say it, but if we want to grow the BBL we have to increase the number of internationals. Which means growing the salary cap and the money involved. Also means changing the summer schedule completely so the Australian test stars get to play a decent chunk of it.
I'd advocate that other countries aren't the problem. CA in conjunction with the ICC allocates far more time to fixturing the national side compared with other countries which has a twofold effect:The major problem of course is that numerous countries have their cricket season at the same time, making the vast majority of players unavailable. How can it be taken seriously when even the best limited overs players in Australia aren’t even playing?
Something else to consider, the amount of BBL clubs a player is allowed to have played with. Cap it at 3 maybe? Would mean clubs are more loyal to players or we see more young players coming through the (BBL) system.
how many times do the bpl teams play each other? compared to the bbl?I'd advocate that other countries aren't the problem. CA in conjunction with the ICC allocates far more time to fixturing the national side compared with other countries which has a twofold effect:
1. The best Australian players are not available
2. There are less dates available to the BBL to avoid conflict with other portions of the Australian domestic and international cricket schedule.
Comparing it to the BPL which runs at almost the same time, top players are paid roughly the same amount for the tournaments (~$150k USD), however the BBL is two weeks longer this time through. Andre Russell was quoted as saying the BPL is shorter and more fun; he's also probably comparing it to last season's debacle.
Both do twice each, 12 game reg season in BPL vs 14 in the BBL.how many times do the bpl teams play each other? compared to the bbl?
I find it difficult to reconcile the best Australian players not being involved in the Big Bash being an issue but at the same time when they all play together for Australia in a T20 the general consensus is that it is s**t.I'd advocate that other countries aren't the problem. CA in conjunction with the ICC allocates far more time to fixturing the national side compared with other countries which has a twofold effect:
1. The best Australian players are not available
2. There are less dates available to the BBL to avoid conflict with other portions of the Australian domestic and international cricket schedule.
I think the core interest of domestic T20 leagues is seeing them play AGAINST each other.I find it difficult to reconcile the best Australian players not being involved in the Big Bash being an issue but at the same time when they all play together for Australia in a T20 the general consensus is that it is s**t.
I think it's also the league aspect as opposed to 1-3 random matches that don't really mean anything to the casual fan.I think the core interest of domestic T20 leagues is seeing them play AGAINST each other.
I find it difficult to reconcile the best Australian players not being involved in the Big Bash being an issue but at the same time when they all play together for Australia in a T20 the general consensus is that it is s**t.
not a bad player to bring to replace a departing international
not a bad player to bring to replace a departing international
not a bad player to bring to replace a departing international
He’s an Australian resident these days, married that journo who’s name escapes me right now.
Remember reading that he hopes to qualify as an Aussie down the track.