Or do we take a chance of Bryan at 36 and he may develop..We will have to trade inside 10 for Jackson to be there for us imo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Or do we take a chance of Bryan at 36 and he may develop..We will have to trade inside 10 for Jackson to be there for us imo.
Tuohy bench, Henry in the two's or FP.
Still same problem of 8 defenders is too many then dont need one on the bench most of the game.
Coaches rate Henry i cant see him being dropped unless he becomes a fwd.
I rate Gould but i dont really see a spot for him short or long term.
I could make the same negative case for why we shouldn't draft Flanders.
I see Henry's future as a forward! If he was in this years draft he would go first round IMO. He has all the attributes of any mid size forward in the draft and is a proven AFL level player (can handle the demands).Still same problem of 8 defenders is too many then dont need one on the bench most of the game.
Coaches rate Henry i cant see him being dropped unless he becomes a fwd.
I rate Gould but i dont really see a spot for him short or long term.
Really? Our mids are much older than our defenders so i see a spot for him there.
182cm Flanders will be finding it alot harder even VFL.
Why?
Why?
Won't be beating up U18 kids any more, now it's his turn.
He's only played against schoolboys.
So i take it you wouldnt draft anyone who hasnt played against men then?
I see Henry's future as a forward! If he was in this years draft he would go first round IMO. He has all the attributes of any mid size forward in the draft and is a proven AFL level player (can handle the demands).
His time up forward as a very raw kid was an eye opener for me. He now has the necessary experience in defence on mid size forwards to be a handful up forward himself. Henry is one of they keys to the big improvement we need this year.
So i take it you wouldnt draft anyone who hasnt played against men then?
Still same problem of 8 defenders is too many then dont need one on the bench most of the game.
Coaches rate Henry i cant see him being dropped unless he becomes a fwd.
I rate Gould but i dont really see a spot for him short or long term.
He will be a lead up type third tall IMO.Kicking?
It’s a funny point.. as they then posters get on the backs of players that have played the “men” that don’t adjust after one season of playing AFL.So i take it you wouldnt draft anyone who hasnt played against men then?
I can see him getting the ball but without improving his kicking he will struggle be weighed down by conversion issues.. not a long kick either. I wonder is if he would be overly reliant on his marking but all players have their issues.He will be a lead up type third tall IMO.
Kicking is not brilliant but is good enough for that role IMO. His kicking will improve as it becomes a focus. Clever kid this one.
But then Krueger comes in having played SANFL vs men and is still taking time.Won't be beating up U18 kids any more, now it's his turn.
He's only played against schoolboys.
There have been some phenominal perfromances of u18s in the SAFL that havnt transferred over. Aish, Gibbs, toumpas etc. I would be happy to take gould but don't try and pretend he is a better prospect than others based on his SAFL form. I might be biased but WAFL transferrs over a lot better than SAFL formWon't be beating up U18 kids any more, now it's his turn.
He's only played against schoolboys.
Its seems cyclical ... the talent scouts weant away from that type I think it was players like Banik who looked like men against boys that sort of divert clubs towards future development..It’s a funny point.. as they then posters get on the backs of players that have played the “men” that don’t adjust after one season of playing AFL.
Point is.. the bigger ones will stand out vs the kids in the junior comps.. and they all will find it harder stepping up to AFL conditions. Some adjust faster than others.
And every ten years or so the Selwood/ Walsh unicorns pop up to break the mold. But for the rest.. you just have to give them time - and each one is different.
Go Catters
It’s a funny point.. as they then posters get on the backs of players that have played the “men” that don’t adjust after one season of playing AFL.
Point is.. the bigger ones will stand out vs the kids in the junior comps.. and they all will find it harder stepping up to AFL conditions. Some adjust faster than others.
And every ten years or so the Selwood/ Walsh unicorns pop up to break the mold. But for the rest.. you just have to give them time - and each one is different.
Go Catters
But then Krueger comes in having played SANFL vs men and is still taking time.
Point is - kids are gonna take time and each one is different - who and what they played is no guarantee of being more prepared when they arrive. They are all gonna take time.
Go Catters