Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
he ran a 2.97-second 20-metre sprint and also finished third overall in the 2km time trial at the Draft Combine
Sounds like Hiscox
I would be hugely disappointed if the club hadn’t done its DD on all the players.I’m saying it’s a waste of time the club wouldn’t have put the time into these players. Let’s get the player we want!
Plus I don’t want to go to pick 6...that has a horrible record
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
My worry with Stephens is all anyone talks about with him is his athleticism. Players like that usually struggle at an AFL level.
I would be hugely disappointed if the club hadn’t done its DD on all the players.
We are picking players not draft positions and therefore I don’t believe in curses or other superstitions.
Yes agree but not sure we should be writing them off. Don’t see why we should do them any favours unless we are getting the same back from them.You’d do less on a rivals academy players though
Twoomey just locked in his top 11 (we had Flanders), saying he would be surprised if any changes happened.
Stephens just now - "Sydney haven't met my parents yet." - Strike him off then.
Yes agree but not sure we should be writing them off. Don’t see why we should do them any favours unless we are getting the same back from them.
We keep our pick five and to induce GWS to give up their pick four, we give up next year's first rounder and agree to not select Tom Green with either pick 4 or pick 5.Why would we want to give up something of significance to go from pick 5 to pick 4? Probably still pick the same player.
Twoomey just locked in his top 11 (we had Flanders), saying he would be surprised if any changes happened.
Stephens just now - "Sydney haven't met my parents yet." - Strike him off then.
I'd love for that to happen. Imagine picking up Flanders and Serong in this draft. That would be a big win.I’ve heard that if Serong slides past 10 we will be moving 25 and a future to get ahead and pick him up
We keep our pick five and to induce GWS to give up their pick four, we give up next year's first rounder and agree to not select Tom Green with either pick 4 or pick 5.
My worry with Stephens is all anyone talks about with him is his athleticism. Players like that usually struggle at an AFL level.
Not as built as Worpel, probably not as useful in terms of goal kicking, and I haven't seen anything to show that he's got the same amount of mongrel in him. Better speed though, would love to have him and Rowbottom bursting away from stoppagesA faster Worpel who can actually kick then.![]()
That's the number one priority in footy these days.
Stephens is also a good user of the footy though. He had some Matt Ling-esque moments of pure class in the SANFL games that I watched him in (haven't seen as much of that league as the NAB league though) and also on the run and under pressure too, which at least suggests the athletic/physical side of the game doesn't impact his ability to create and execute too much.
I'd be confident we'd have a future gun on our hands if we got Stephens, though I still think it would be a waste of our first pick.
That’s why among other reasons have Flanders my number 1 choice
No one has received more hype based on their athleticism than Flanders...
Plus other factors.
I do query the weight of Stephens as 67kgs is dead set a stick figure would need to put 12kgs on minimum.
My worry with Stephens is all anyone talks about with him is his athleticism. Players like that usually struggle at an AFL level.
I reckon we might just be looking at McAsey with our first. Just something Kinnear said yesterday. It was a, passing comment about needs. He mentioned McAsey being the best tall and pretty well match ready. He said he did not believe in just taking next best as a matter of form. It was all about needs. No use taking a small forward if you have a forward line full of 'Em.
He also said who is next best anyway? You have a choice between an apple and an orange. Which tastes better? A ruch, tall, small, mid, forward, back. It all depends on your greatest need and who is available at the time. Go home factor, psych assessment, character assessment, work ethic, ability to live independently all figure. I loved his, candidnrss. Although he gave nothing away.
On ANE-LX2J using BigFooty.com mobile app
I really hope we don’t take McAsey at all although I’d like him more than Young at least!
Young is good. He just isn't the sort of player we are looking for. He seems like a quality player though.