Review 2019 AFL National Draft

[Event Horizon]

Just mentioned SPP selections are rookies which Campbell was a SPP selection

ANALYSIS: How the new rookie rule will change football

Shane Mumford and Zac Clarke set to be the pioneers of a draft revolution, Marc McGowan reports

m.afl.com.au

He may well have been upgraded together with Zurhaar

 

[The Nostradamus]

He may well have been upgraded together with Zurhaar

I think Campbell’s a rookie and the website just isn’t updated

We have 40 players on our list at the moment
Campbell senior list means we have 37 and 3
Campbell rookie list means we have 36 and 4

And think it’s the latter as per finnegan quote

 

[speedy]

If Mark Finnigan says we have 4 primary list spots, then surely we have 4 primary list spots.

 

[Event Horizon]

I think Campbell’s a rookie and the website just isn’t updated

Hard to say. Either way, we can have a mix of 36+3, meaning we have 4 spots and 1 rookie available, or if he's a rookie, we have 35 +4, which still means 4 spots and 1 rookie can be selected or 5+0

 

[The Nostradamus]

Hard to say. Either way, we can have a mix of 36+3, meaning we have 4 spots and 1 rookie available, or if he's a rookie, we have 35 +4, which still means 4 spots and 1 rookie can be selected or 5+0

Your count is 1 short we have 40 players atm not 39

We are either at 36-4 or 37-3 atm

 

[Event Horizon]

We have 36 with Campbell or 35 if he's a rookie

 

[Event Horizon]

Your count is 1 short we have 40 players atm not 39

We are either at 36-4 or 37-3 atm

We have 36 or 35 if Campbell is a rookie

 

[The Nostradamus]

We have 36 with Campbell or 35 if he's a rookie

37 with Campbell, 36 if he’s a rookie

Total of 40 players since we added bonar. room for either 3 senior list and 1 rookie or 4 senior list and no rookies depending on where Campbell is

 

[New_Roo]

His math is right. We have 36 on the primary list currently

Maths!


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Firestarter]

For a first rounder next year. Not for two picks in 30s/40s

And who tf knows where Melbourne could end up. I'm still cynical.

 

[Event Horizon]

37 with Campbell, 36 if he’s a rookie

Total of 40 players since we added bonar room for either 3 senior list and 1 rookie or 4 senior list and no rookies

Yeah, the site doesn't list Bonar. That means we can still have 4 spots but no rookies.

 

[giantroo]

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl
Melbourne considering trading pick 8 to land three top prospects in next week’s AFL draft
Best mates Matthew Rowell and Noah Anderson are all but certain to be chosen with the first two picks in next week’s AFL draft. But how will the next 12 selections play out? Jay Clark and Sam Landsberger give their prediction.
Sam Landsberger and Jay Clark, Herald Sun

Subscriber only
|
November 20, 2019 4:47pm




Melbourne is seriously considering a double-play with its pair of top-10 picks that would deliver versatile ruckman Luke Jackson and two other high draft choices.
The Demons hold picks No. 3 and 8 and are eyeing Jackson with their first pick, believing the former Australian basketballer can shine in a tandem act with All-Australian Max Gawn, who turns 28 next month.
The Demons are also looking to trade their No. 8 choice for two picks, which could come in the teens and early 20s.

Geelong, which holds picks No. 14, 17 and 24, and Port Adelaide, which holds picks No. 12, 16 and 18, are the two leading contenders.
Hawthorn emerged as a potential buyer on Wednesday after securing a second-round pick in next year’s draft, enabling it to swap its own future first-round pick for another early choice next week.
That would enable Melbourne to snap up a small forward, such as Cody Weightman, in the teens to help replace Jeff Garlett after it missed out on free agent Jamie Elliott.

Jackson would be the first ruckman taken with a top-five pick since West Coast secured Nic Naitanui at No. 2 in 2008.

It is a bold move from the Dees, but Jackson – who has been likened to Collingwood superstar Brodie Grundy for his ability to hunt at ground level – soared up draft boards late in the year.

The Demons are unlikely to bid on GWS academy star Tom Green before drafting Jackson, because the Giants would pounce on Jackson at No. 4 instead of matching the bid.


The Giants are light-on for ruck stocks with veterans Sam Jacobs, 31, and Shane Mumford, 33, set to lead the division in 2020.

Clubs are this week holding their final recruiting meetings and determining their talent orders ahead of next Wednesday and Thursday’s national draft.

The Giants are poised to choose between halfbacks Hayden Young and Lachie Ash at pick No.4.


While Young has been highly touted all year for his elite kicking skills, Ash’s line-breaking speed has won comparisons to Essendon jet Adam Saad.

Sydney is desperate to bolster its onball brigade and is eyeing dynamic Sam Flanders as it plans for life after Josh Kennedy.

The Swans will bid their No. 5 selection on Green and, when the Giants match that bid, are then expected to welcome Flanders at No.6.

Adelaide traded back from No. 4 to No. 6, which will become No. 7 after Green joins GWS, knowing it could still secure Sandringham Dragons key defender Fischer McAsey.

That would spoil the party for Geelong, Hawthorn and Western Bulldogs, who are all keen on the Aaron Naughton clone.


At pick No. 8 Fremantle could turn to gun small forward Caleb Serong or halfbacks Ash or Young, depending on who GWS overlooks.

Melbourne’s second top-10 pick is likely to find a new home before departing Carlton list manager Stephen Silvagni uses his final first-round selection. The Blues are expected to part with Silvagni after next week’s drafts.

South Australian midfielder Dylan Stephens, ACL victim Brodie Kemp, Serong and Ash are all on Silvagni’s radar, while Young would a great result if he slipped.

The Blues are also seriously considering for Fremantle academy prospect and lethal small forward Liam Henry.

Carlton, which missed out on securing Tom Papley in the trade period with this pick, is a big fan of Henry’s tricks and goal nous.

Hawthorn, which currently holds pick No. 11, has been linked to Kemp and could also make a left-field play for 195cm intercepting defender Josh Worrell.

Sam Landsberger and Jay Clark's predicted AFL draft top 14

Gold Coast 1. Matt Rowell (Oakleigh Chargers, 180cm midfielder)
Gold Coast 2. Noah Anderson (Oakleigh Chargers, 191cm midfield-forward)
Melbourne 3. Luke Jackson (East Fremantle, 199cm ruckman)
GWS 4. Lachie Ash (Murray Bushrangers, 186cm halfback)
GWS 5. Tom Green* (GWS academy, 191cm midfielder)
Sydney 6. Sam Flanders (Gippsland Power, 182cm midfielder)
Adelaide 7. Fischer McAsey (Sandringham Dragons, 197cm defender)
Fremantle 8. Hayden Young (Dandenong Stingrays, 188cm halfback)
Melbourne 9. Demons will trade this pick to another club
Carlton 10. Caleb Serong (Gippsland Power, 179cm midfield-forward)
Fremantle 11. Deven Robertson (Perth, 184cm midfielder)
Hawthorn 12. Brodie Kemp (Bendigo Pioneers, 193cm defender)
Port Adelaide 13. Dylan Stephens (Norwood, 183cm midfielder)
Western Bulldogs 14. Miles Bergman (Sandringham Dragons, 189cm utility)
*GWS matches Sydney’s bid for Green, pushing the order back one

 

[The Nostradamus]

Yeah, the site doesn't list Bonar. That means we can still have 4 spots but no rookies.

correct which leads to my point of why we waited so long to delist mckenzie when we knew campbell and hosie were taking those rookie spots anyway and there wasnt going to be one for him

our other question is do we take walker at pick 47/ take him now as a dfa

 

[New_Roo]

I think Campbell’s a rookie and the website just isn’t updated

We have 40 players on our list at the moment
Campbell senior list means we have 37 and 3
Campbell rookie list means we have 36 and 4

And think it’s the latter as per finnegan quote

Website was updated quick enough to get rid of Wilkinson and McKenzie though...


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[The Nostradamus]

Website was updated quick enough to get rid of Wilkinson and McKenzie though...


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

yeah which is why i always went by it so was surprised when finnegan said we had 4 but then it makes sense if campbell is a rookie as per the article

 

[New_Roo]

correct which leads to my point of why we waited so long to delist mckenzie when we knew campbell and hosie were taking those rookie spots anyway and there wasnt going to be one for him

our other question is do we take walker at pick 47/ take him now as a dfa

If we take walker we don’t need Gould.... still think they are waiting to see where Gould lands then decide on walker


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[The Nostradamus]

If we take walker we don’t need Gould.... still think they are waiting to see where Gould lands then decide on walker


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Not a bad play. If we don’t get a KPD/interceptor type with 26,27,30 then take walker at 47

 

[Nutjob]

Not a bad play. If we don’t get a KPD/interceptor type with 26,27,30 then take walker at 47

If our hand stays the same we are better off trading 47 for whatever we can get in next years draft and pick Walker up as a rookie. Seems pretty wasteful using an ok pick on a player that no one else intends to pick and that could easily be picked up as a rookie.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Clarke is King]

Will we use all 3 top 30 picks or look to package a couple up for a higher pick? Maybe dealing with a club that is expecting an early bid on an academy / father son like freo?

Over to you posters who love hypothesising these scenarios.

 

[The Nostradamus]

If our hand stays the same we are better off trading 47 for whatever we can get in next years draft and pick Walker up as a rookie. Seems pretty wasteful using an ok pick on a player that no one else intends to pick and that could easily be picked up as a rookie.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

good point and we can do that trade on the night if we want also

 

[Clarke is King]

If our hand stays the same we are better off trading 47 for whatever we can get in next years draft and pick Walker up as a rookie. Seems pretty wasteful using an ok pick on a player that no one else intends to pick and that could easily be picked up as a rookie.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Pardon my ignorance, which Walker are you two talking about ? Josh? Are we committed to taking him?

 

[The Nostradamus]

Pardon my ignorance, which Walker are you two talking about ? Josh? Are we committed to taking him?

Josh and no not committed but clearly we are interested and fills a need if we don’t pick a KPD with our first 3 picks

 

[75-77-96-99]

can we package 30 and 47 and our 2021 1st round pick tied to melbourne for freo pick 10
we will then have pick 10 - 26 - 27

 

[The Nostradamus]

can we package 30 and 47 and our 2021 1st round pick tied to melbourne for freo pick 10
we will then have pick 10 - 26 - 27

thats overs, a first rounder plus 2 more picks for a first rounder

 

[The Nostradamus]

i would leave next years picks alone and just find a way to package 2 of our 4 picks for 1 higher pick

take 3 picks plus walker and be done